Quote Originally Posted by Tenknics View Post
Haha, that argument is such a joke. You take this crap way too seriously. Fermi is late, I don't care what you call it, a uARCH, a product whatever. The uARCH is what the product is based off of right? We were told it'd be out in 09, its not. That's my point. You are way too literal and it seems the fanboy in you will pick apart anything anyone says just to find something to argue with.
why do you have such an aggressive response to my argument? quit being so emotional. i'm not picking at your words, you just post ridiculous things.

I guess r600 wasn't late either..It wasn't a product, just a uARCH. And Tukwilla? Nah, not 3 years late. It was never a product, just a uARCH! '
exactly. its not a hard concept to grasp. the delays were process related too. they put too much on their plate but it payed off in the end. tukwila is another story altogether.
I would sure like to make new uARCHs for a living. That way I can just keep working on it indefinitely and not have worry about it ever being late. uARCHs are immune from time, they can't be late or early! They aren't products after all~
you are very funny but i dont know how you could have reached this conclusion based on my statement. fermi taped out 6 months ago so the architecture is finished. they had 3 metal spins which were for debugging.
Whether info is official or not, something is obviously wrong. Deny it all you want, have fun in whatever world you're living in. I live in reality.
that something would be yields. i thought that was well known by now.

Point to me where I am blatently insulting other people, putting them down and trying to start stuff? ??!?!
look up.^^