Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 84

Thread: NVIDIA Builds GeForce PC Kit

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by InSanCen View Post
    This is not designed for people like us.
    Nice it only took 2 pages of posts for someone to get it! Yeah it's a pile of horse crap from our perspective but the vast majority of people would consider this a good gaming PC considering what they usually have.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Chickenfeed View Post
    That system would be suited for 1024x768-1280x1024 ( max ) with moderate settings, as far as current games are concerned. My issue with it isn't the fact I wouldn't buy it but the fact that their PR and marketing direction is very misleading. If they pushed this with words like "starter", "budget" , "affordable" then perhaps but trying to make it out to be way more than it is, is just unethical. "Hey guys, check out our awesome super duper high end gaming system that you can build yourself! Yeah!" Apparently their marketing departments need to maintain the size of their finctional man hoods (aka Nvidia's brand name) by touting anything with the word "Nvidia" on it as the second coming of Jesus... Its just a tad retarded. I'm not offended by the concept but by its piss poor execution of a pontentially good idea. They are just trying to take advantage of their brand awareness and cash in. Bad play, Nvidia, bad play.
    If you look at word semantics, any company can be caught lying or misleading.

    The ATI Radeon HD 5570 graphics card provides great game play in DirectX® 11 titles such as Codemaster's Colin McRae™: DiRT® 2™, EA Phenomic's BattleForge™ , GSC Game World's S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Call of Pripyat™ and Battlefield: Bad Company™

    http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases...2010feb09.aspx

    Stalker and dirt 2 are both going to be hard pressed to play any of those titles in directx 11 mode on a 5570.

    I think people are just looking for way to be pissed off an NV. Does it feel that good to be pissed off that we need to find or invent ways to do it.

    The 8800 might not be cutting edge per see, but it's a step up from consoles.

    Most of the public see console hardware as cutting edge.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Most of the public see console hardware as cutting edge.
    When it's just released.

    People aren't as dumb as you seem to think. The non-tech people I know understand quite well that the XBOX 360 or PS3 are a couple of years old, and thus quite 'obsolete' in term of hardware.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    I wonder if NVidia just trying to make some money by reselling components from other manufacturers labeled with NVidia's brand.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    250
    This is not designed for people like us.

    This is designed for your average joe to walk into a shop, see the shiny colour-coded box's, buy it, build it, and say "I did that".

    If it's their first PC, then Nvidia will likely get repeat custom from them further down the road. First impressions count, assuming it doesn't blow up on them, or take their house out in a fireball, then this is what they will think of when building a new one.

    It's the reason marketing exists. The fact that people in the know Nvidia's marketing is often plain wrong with their facts is totally irrelevant, because marketing does usually work on it's target audience, which we are most certainly not.
    Exactly you hit the nail on the head!

    Im not a huge nvidia fan, but I actually really like the idea! OK if you price all the stuff up and do it yourself you can get a better deal, but thats not who its trying to target.

    Personally, I think if they were going to do this, they should (I know nothing about intels btw), market it with a decent cooler and promote the scope for overclocking. So OK it starts of average at best, but if ppl are able to OC the balls off it safely then that would make it a worthwhile buy.

    That system would be suited for 1024x768-1280x1024 ( max ) with moderate settings, as far as current games are concerned. My issue with it isn't the fact I wouldn't buy it but the fact that their PR and marketing direction is very misleading. If they pushed this with words like "starter", "budget" , "affordable" then perhaps but trying to make it out to be way more than it is, is just unethical. "Hey guys, check out our awesome super duper high end gaming system that you can build yourself! Yeah!" Apparently their marketing departments need to maintain the size of their finctional man hoods (aka Nvidia's brand name) by touting anything with the word "Nvidia" on it as the second coming of Jesus... Its just a tad retarded. I'm not offended by the concept but by its piss poor execution of a pontentially good idea. They are just trying to take advantage of their brand awareness and cash in. Bad play, Nvidia, bad play.
    Yea I do agree, marketing it as 'high end' is wrong, but Considering a mate of mine has pretty much this setup and he can play most games on high/highest settings then maybe in relation to the games out there its not so bad.
    Last edited by mcmeat51; 02-24-2010 at 03:27 AM.
    TBA

  6. #56
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    yuck ultra psu's, add a couple of bucks for OS too...
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by takamishanoku View Post
    Are nvidia trying their hardest to piss ppl off??
    If they wanted to piss people off, they'd pair a GT210 or GT220 with this. Maybe one of those 9500GS's with the fan that clicks after a while...
    Computer:
    Case: Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
    Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus X570 Ultra
    RAM: Team TForce Xtreem ARGB 3600C14 2x16gb XMP
    CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900x
    Graphics: EVGA (rip) RTX 3080 FTW3
    PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 850w
    Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
    NVMe: SKHynix P41 Platinum, Samsung 980 Pro 2tb
    SSD: Micron 1100 2TB, Samsung 860 Evo 1tb
    HDD: WD SE 2TB, WD Black 1tb 3 platter with over 10 years of power-on time

  8. #58
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    Quote Originally Posted by InSanCen View Post
    This is not designed for people like us.

    This is designed for your average joe to walk into a shop, see the shiny colour-coded box's, buy it, build it, and say "I did that".

    If it's their first PC, then Nvidia will likely get repeat custom from them further down the road. First impressions count, assuming it doesn't blow up on them, or take their house out in a fireball, then this is what they will think of when building a new one.

    It's the reason marketing exists. The fact that people in the know Nvidia's marketing is often plain wrong with their facts is totally irrelevant, because marketing does usually work on it's target audience, which we are most certainly not.

    Yeah you 100% right. It's just hard to accept from what we know. I react the exact same with apple products (and they are def not design for our market).

  9. #59
    Xτræmε ÇruñcheΓ
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Molvanîa
    Posts
    2,849
    wow, buy a computer, probably pay more to have to assemble it yourself.
    if only dell could pull this off
    i7 2700k 4.60ghz -- Z68XP-UD4 F6F -- Ripjaws 2x4gb 1600mhz -- 560 Ti 448 stock!? -- Liquid Cooling Apogee XT -- Claro+ ATH-M50s -- U2711 2560x1440
    Majestouch 87 Blue -- Choc Mini Brown -- Poker Red -- MX11900 -- G9

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    川崎市
    Posts
    2,076
    Good idea, but the rest is made of fail.

    Lets face it, most people don't have a 30" screen and don't need a highend pc to play games, budget hardware is good enough for the majority.
    Combine that with the ever increasing pressure on the pc from consoles and there is a clear need for a cheap gaming capable pc.

    However, this is not cheap and there is something between the ancient trash hw they use and highend, but oh well, at least they are not trying to sell a pc using igp as gaming capable like too many oems do.

    If they would just update the components a bit, lower the price and focus the advertising around the fact that a gaming capable pc doesn't have to cost a arm and leg it could end up as good product.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    312
    For the first time in history. . . I think a company (nvidia) just trolled the consumer. They must be getting epic lulz.

  12. #62
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Terrible hardware choices.
    They should've made one in a decent case with i7, Fermi and 3D glasses kit.
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    whats the price?
    sounds like a good cheap gaming pc... but i guess its not cheap
    Crappy gaming PC you mean. Probably not cheap, but slow and outdated for sure...
    Last edited by zalbard; 02-24-2010 at 09:38 AM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  13. #63
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    not worth it at $500.
    would have worked better at $400

    the only way you can get people to not just build their own $500 pc is to have the effective price of the components in this bundle below the retail price of them, enough so that people are willing to lose the flexibility of choosing their own components in order to save money.
    Last edited by grimREEFER; 02-24-2010 at 06:07 PM.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  14. #64
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    At the rate how f-ed up this is, if I were a complete computer noob I'd rather ask someone to assemble a rig for me.

    But neither of those are the main argument. The fact that nVidia are willing to tack their name unto this, somehow making this the "definitive" Geforce kit, is just puke inducing.

    It's their loss though, when people dumb enough to get this finally realize that the rig's incompetent enough to play most stuff without stuttering its way there thanks to the RAM/vRAM amount though.
    As the saying goes, you have to learn to walk before you run.

    Just like Radioshack offered all the cheesy electronics kits (by todays standards) back in the day for the beginner to get familiar and learn to build a basic circuit themselves.

    Whats the point in a kit if you just get somebody experienced to build you a rig, there's something to be learned by taking the initiative and making that first step yourself.

    When the folks who buy this kit realize what they have the kit has served its purpose. They built their first pc, got familiar with the process and components and now maybe have a grasp of what they may want in their next build.

    I would imagine for most beginners their first pc probably wasn't even as good as this kit is. Its definitely better than entry level and a long way from high end but its not bad for a starter kit.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  15. #65
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Terrible hardware choices.
    They should've made one in a decent case with i7, Fermi and 3D glasses kit.

    Crappy gaming PC you mean. Probably not cheap, but slow and outdated for sure...
    I would love to see more high end DIY kits. Even Newegg's $4700 DIY kit is at least decent, especially compared to this $500 kit.

    I totally agree that they need a better kit to represent their brand. Here's what I'd like to see for an Nvidia kit:

    Intel Core i7 920 cpu
    Intel X25-M G2 160GB SSD boot drive
    Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB HDD data drive
    Asus P6X58D motherboard
    Corsair 6GB DDR3 1600MHz Dominator memory
    Corsair 800D case
    NVidia GTX 470 gpu
    Nvidia 3D glasses
    Alienware 3D 1080P monitor

    Something like that would much better represent the brand, I would think.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    563
    This is obviously not for people who can build their own rigs, because we can put better parts, they will sell these, because there are more of those who cant, then who can.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Upstate, SC
    Posts
    644
    wow, this seemed like a decent cheap server/spare computer for a friend to game on untill i saw the price... this is deff for the avg joe idiot who likes shiny objects.
    SYSTEM
    i5-3750K @ 4.6ghz - ASRock Z77 Extreme4 - 16GB Samsung DDR3 - Sapphire R7 370 Nitro 4GB
    Water Cooling
    EK Supremecy - DDC-3.2 w/XSPC Top -Swiftech MCR320-QP - EK Multioption 150

  18. #68
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    319
    Well, if you look at it from Apples standpoint, that's a pretty good deal if it cost 450$ish in parts. It should have options to change the video card and cpu, but I guess it's another way for Nvidia to liquidate their stock of old 8800's.

    An Apple Mac pro with a single quad xeon, 3gigs ram, 640gb hd, a superdrive, and a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB is 2500$ base price. Now that is absurd.
    MM H2gO - Win 7 Pro
    2 PA120.2 Thermochill
    MCP355 w/XSPC res top
    i5-2500k @ 5.0ghz w/Heatkiller 3.0
    Corsair HX850 - M IV Gene-z
    GTX 480 w/DD 480 ni/cu

  19. #69
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    E5300 "800 FSB" hahahha
    G31 "PCIe 1.0" hahahah
    Re-branded 8800GT hahahahaha

    This should be the hahaha nvidia edition

    Instead of this they should have used:

    E6300
    P43
    GTX 260

    This is the bare min i would call a proper gaming system, 9800GT/GTS 250 are worthless "Buying a new one now a days" in my books.

    It would have been so sweet if nvidia released a water cooled gtx 480/I7 or Thuban/890FX or x58 powered PC kit
    Coming Soon

  20. #70
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    idk man, 250s are pretty sweet...
    100$ and you get a 1gb gts that can play most games at full HD with eyecandy maxed and even aa?
    ati has nothing even close to that price perf wise...
    the 5750 is the only thing near it and it starts at 150$... thats quite a big dx11 tax there... thats not worth it for those price segments...

  21. #71
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    idk man, 250s are pretty sweet...
    100$ and you get a 1gb gts that can play most games at full HD with eyecandy maxed and even aa?
    ati has nothing even close to that price perf wise...
    the 5750 is the only thing near it and it starts at 150$... thats quite a big dx11 tax there... thats not worth it for those price segments...
    You're forgetting about 4770! It's cool, quiet, cheap, and overclocks like a beast!
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    263
    People in this thread are Xtreme at everything other than intelligence hahahahha.

    This PC can game better than most PCs available at every brick and mortar store like Best Buy etc.

  23. #73
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    You're forgetting about 4770! It's cool, quiet, cheap, and overclocks like a beast!
    hmmm not really...
    99$ for 512mb and 140$ for 1gb...
    the 512mb is an alternative to a G92 card, but idk... isnt a GTS250 faster? and you can get a 1gb gts250 for 99$, thats damn good...
    the 1gb 4770 is ridiculous, you can almost get a 5750 with 1gb for that price... whod buy a 4770 for the same price as a 5750?

    i noticed that i posted this in another thread by accident

    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Saaya, I am surprised your using such a cheap Power supply in your argument. Sure Ultra is not the best(it actually bad), but I would assume that with a lifetime warranty, they are not using a crap oem like deer.
    ive built several gaming pcs for friends a couple of years back and always used the cheapest 400-500W cr4p that came bundled with the cheapest cr4-p cases... and while i had 1 DOA, after it was replaced, which was immediatly since the shop swaps those, there havent been problems with those pcs... ever...

    unless you build a real highend pc or plan to overclock PSUs are way overrated in my experience...

    Quote Originally Posted by Chickenfeed View Post
    That system would be suited for 1024x768-1280x1024 ( max ) with moderate settings, as far as current games are concerned. My issue with it isn't the fact I wouldn't buy it but the fact that their PR and marketing direction is very misleading. If they pushed this with words like "starter", "budget" , "affordable" then perhaps but trying to make it out to be way more than it is, is just unethical. "Hey guys, check out our awesome super duper high end gaming system that you can build yourself! Yeah!" Apparently their marketing departments need to maintain the size of their finctional man hoods (aka Nvidia's brand name) by touting anything with the word "Nvidia" on it as the second coming of Jesus... Its just a tad retarded. I'm not offended by the concept but by its piss poor execution of a pontentially good idea. They are just trying to take advantage of their brand awareness and cash in. Bad play, Nvidia, bad play.
    i think it could play 1680x1050 fine in most games...
    overall, i like the idea... its basically an attempt at making people look at a pc like a console...

    but thats stupid because you cant beat consoles when it comes to price performance... as the hardware is subsidized heavily for consoles...
    so focusing on price is the wrong way to go, they ned to focus on features...
    theres a whole lot more you can do with pcs that you cant do with consoles... and gaming wise pcs can also offer a much better experience than consoles...

    i think that idea was good, but the way they did it was stupid...
    they should have gone for a 1000us$ mark instead and put together a pc that is a REAL kick4ss system. something that offers better gameplay than consoles... maybe even with 3d display...

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    577
    Craptastic

    Not a bad idea, just horrible components and overpriced as well. The exact same system (With CM PSU) costs ~$420. Hmm
    i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing

    Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull

    E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP

    A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP

  25. #75
    Xtremely Hot Sauce
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,586
    Quote Originally Posted by LightSpeed View Post
    Craptastic

    Not a bad idea, just horrible components and overpriced as well. The exact same system (With CM PSU) costs ~$420. Hmm
    Had they started this a year or more ago, nobody would be giving them much flak. The fact that they're doing this in 2010 is what's pissing people off. 2GB RAM and a 250GB hard drive is a joke. This system is a blast from the past; firmly in mid-2007 territory so far as speed is concerned.

    My toys:
    Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
    Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
    Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
    Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •