Pi Wall Broken Sub 6 by GIGABYTE P55A-UD7

**railer** · 02-01-2010, 01:15 AM

Epic man.

First 5's

**Hampti** · 02-01-2010, 02:08 AM

Really good work. Insane Results. A milestone is rechead!!

**junior-21-** · 02-01-2010, 02:19 AM

amazing score!

Keep pushing man! :T:

**RPGWiZaRD** · 02-01-2010, 06:40 AM

7043MHz superpi

-192°C

2.11v

sub-6 secs

hicookie

There's no word that can describe the awesomeness of this result. Wonder if the new UD7 is a part of the reason to this achievement.

I hope Gigabyte pays you well.

**WaterFlex** · 02-01-2010, 07:29 AM

Unbeliveable. Amazing work man

**Maduk** · 02-01-2010, 08:38 AM

Cpu from space like Vcore

**Mad222** · 02-01-2010, 09:33 AM

Hicookie, it works!
I did a fast CPU Pin Mod on my retail 670
Core Temp. could get down from around -110c to -150c

Assumed the pot temp. was under -180c

6.885G with UD6
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=990076

Will go for 7G after I get the regulator modded

**Kenji_Takeda** · 02-01-2010, 07:58 PM

good good time. but not comprehend time of step. how this make possible?

**Benny Lodewijk** · 02-01-2010, 08:37 PM

Just amazing Hicookie

.... keep pushing !

**diezel** · 02-01-2010, 08:37 PM

amazing Hicookie do you have backup

**Tom Holck** · 02-02-2010, 03:44 PM

Originally Posted by Kenji_Takeda

good good time. but not comprehend time of step. how this make possible?

Welcome to Xtreme Kenji

**STEvil** · 02-02-2010, 06:15 PM

Tom you need to make more noise!

**Tom Holck** · 02-02-2010, 11:08 PM

Originally Posted by STEvil

Tom you need to make more noise!

thanks Stevil, shortly I'll go out loud

just saw a newbee and nobody seems to care.

**In-Fluence** · 02-03-2010, 05:17 AM

<6 seconds! The best - nuff said!

**[XC] Oj101** · 02-03-2010, 05:34 AM

Jeez man, it wasn't that long ago that coolaler hit 9.000s and now you're more than 33% quicker, CRAZY

**GraduS** · 02-03-2010, 06:30 AM

Originally Posted by ceemic

True

+1

42K:
http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...540_7sec_172ms

**Gautam** · 02-03-2010, 12:14 PM

This thread is locked until one thing gets cleared up.

The timer resolution in Windows XP is 1/64th of a second, or 15.625 milliseconds. The last digit is either the floor or ceiling of the trailing digits. The times reported by SuperPi are all multiples of this minimum unit of time, which is why there are discrete steps in SuperPi as many of you have surely noticed. The smallest step after .000 is .015, followed by .016, followed by .031, etc. The largest step possible is .985, and the next smallest is .984.

Almost none of the loops in the time shown in this thread are multiples of 15.625, and certainly not the final value of 5.991. It would either have to be 5.985, or 6.000, without anything in between being possible due to this inherent constraint in Windows XP.

This thread will be reopened upon a suitable explanation for this being provided.

**Gautam** · 02-03-2010, 03:19 PM

Actually, on second thought, it was a bit rash of me to have locked it, so I apologize for that. Reopened.

**Tom Holck** · 02-03-2010, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by Gautam

Actually, on second thought, it was a bit rash of me to have locked it, so I apologize for that. Reopened.

yes, a big mistake from you

first because his score turned out OK:

http://www.youtube.com/user/hicookie.../0/cIlkJAigozA

But also because we live in the free world we can have different oponion and be open to say what we think.
If someone thought this bench was a fake, well then I think it is OK to say it.

sometimes you may explain how .944 match your calculations.

.985 minus something is .944

Let me add this program is old and the score is not the same every time, specially when OC to the edge. As a PI specialist I may say the runs can be weird.
Glad you gave it a second thought

**dinos22** · 02-03-2010, 03:39 PM

nice work cookie
nice 32M there too
maybe better of using XP or 2003 for 32M though heh

unless you are able to clock higher with this OS? is that why you are using it?

**zalbard** · 02-03-2010, 03:45 PM

I heard XP Olive theme gives a decent SPI boost.

**nickshih** · 02-03-2010, 08:20 PM

secret is 3.7G QPI LINK BIOS option (BCLK X 28)

higher QPI makes clarkdale faster ...

but other mobo BIOS only have 3.2G 4.8G 5.33G 5.8 6.4G for choosing

GIGA really did good job on P55

3.7G makes CPU easily to pull higher and more stable than 4.8G

**dinos22** · 02-03-2010, 08:47 PM

are you testing a giga board now Nick? Have you got any results with it?

**nickshih** · 02-03-2010, 08:54 PM

Originally Posted by dinos22

are you testing a giga board now Nick? Have you got any results with it?

i dont have 1.x version here......

my P55A UD6 is REV 0.1 .... some issue with BCLK

trying to get one

**hiwa** · 02-03-2010, 11:38 PM

mmm cookie use 2k8

will test soon ... but seems a bit slower than good XP

nice to see 6.11 on clarky

Congrats dude

Thread: Pi Wall Broken Sub 6 by GIGABYTE P55A-UD7

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

new member

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions