The GT300/Fermi Thread

[LordEC911]

You may be able to verify some of his info, but he doesn't even allow others to be optimistic, while he himself acts to know everything in such a details that ha can't get surprised . All this without showing any benchmarks or documentation about his claims. He says::

I personally require benchmarks and documentation for this kind of bold claims, otherwise i don't take it serious. You can consider it as good info if you want.

So multiple people saying almost all the info he gave is correct isn't enough?
Hopefully he doesn't mind me saying this, he told me back in August that GF100 was ~G200 size, not G200b, even though everyone was saying it was smaller than G200b.
He was also the first one, that I saw, that hinted that AMD wouldn't brand Hemlock as an x2 part.

Do some research and read his posts, you will find out just how accurate he is. He has posted quite a bit of info before Charlie or Fud or anyone else has posted it.

Edit- I don't think you understand how leaks work... It doesn't matter what you think about him or his info, take it or leave it. He doesn't have to prove anything, either the info is right or wrong and eventually we will know one way or the other. Since his his track record is outstanding, I have no reason to doubt his info.