Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
"esult they did not give a GF100 the ability to drive more than 2 displays at once. The shipping GF100 cards will have the traditional 2 monitor limit, meaning that gamers will need 2 GF100 cards in SLI to drive 3+ monitors"

dam
oh come on... whos really gonna game on 3 monitors... :P

Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
SKYMTL pls add 5970 in gaming results!
oh yeah, that would be cool!
oh and how about HAWX, did they bench HAWX or did nvidia only offer slides for the HAWX perf?

Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
While disappointing that here are no easy to read benchmarks, it's possible to discern general performance from a few key points: The HAWX benchmark in the deep dive slides and the FARCRY2 GF100 vs. GTX285 video. (Check out guru3d's video of the Farcry2 benchmark for extra info). GF100 is ~ 68% faster in FC2, and 61% faster in HAWX, both using 4xAA, compared to a GTX285.

HD5870 is ~35% faster than a GTX285 1920 4xAA, according to Computerbase.de. Also, an HD5970 is ~90% faster than a GTX285. The tested GF100 part sits between a HD5870 & HD5970, closer towards the speed of the 5970. And it appears GF100 handles 8xAA better than HD5000. I rank them as so:

GTX285: 100%
HD5870: 135%
GTX3xx: 168%
HD5970: 190%



mhhhh yeah, looks interesting...