First IOXTREME Review

[Computurd]

69% sequential throughput at block sizes of 4kb-64kb is not max throughput. Max throughput is 100% sequential, block size of like 512kb. Max throughput it irrelevant.

nice of you to explain that for us. however, max throughput as i am referring to it is the reads not being entirely random. the less random the reads, the closer to max thouroughut is the thought i am trying to convey. my reads at 4k random, vs 4k entirely sequential are two different beasts entirely, that i assure you. non-random aka sequential does equal max throughput of that file size. MAX throughput of ANY file size is entirely relevant.

here is anandtechs direct A whopping 69% of the IOs are sequential, meaning this is predominantly a sequential read benchmark"

not 69 percent sequential throughput.
69 PERCENT OF THE INPUT/OUTPUTS are sequential. ( so 69percent of the reads are 100 percent sequential) i am trying hard to explain here.
the input/outputs are NOT 69 percent sequential. again failed logic. i am trying hard to explain here

Because almost everything you posted so far is irrelevant to real world. Iometer is mostly irrelevant to the real world to begin with. Go ahead and post something as per the anand benchmark. i.e. 1 worker, 8 queue, 4kb-64kb size, reads, partially random.

i already have, and it was better. thus invoking cries of "it sucks!!" from you.

I trust that his results are true. Different things(I.E. stevero results).

explain how it is different when he runs it? are his 8k magically better than others?

You can read 4kb as "small files in general". 4kb is just an example.

like 8k??? i thought that 8k is between 4-64k. but then you state 8k is irrelevant. strange. it is closest to your favorite number., how is it irrelevant?

You seem to have read that thread, so go ahead and read what access time is. Hint: queue of anything but 1 is not the measure of access time. Stop being so self centered. That thread has nothing to do with you.

i find it amazing that you make that post within five minutes of my screenshot showing better access times than the i/o extreme. but i will take the self centered comment with a grain of salt.

Because you do not understand the basics so I have to keep trying to get my point across, which unfortunately leads to me repeating myself.

you are trying to define what the basics are, according to YOU. however you have flawed reasoning.