
Originally Posted by
Cybercat
I'm not sure anybody with a good head on their shoulders would submit to your logic. Up until the point you mentioned texture and pixel fillrates, you were spot on, and then...I don't know what happened. All that talk about core configurations and average game performance not being indicative of an overall performance picture, and then you go and compare fillrates? Like this is still the DX7 and 8 era?
If fillrates were such an important factor, the 6800 Ultra wouldn't have kept up as well as it did, the 7900GTX should have done at least as well as the X1900XTX (if not better), and the 8800GTX would never have hit the 60%+ improvement over the 2900XT that it often did.
Forget the fillrates, go back to what you were saying about games and drivers and different core configurations. There's too many factors to look at to really even speculate what the performance would be, but the best guesses are the ones that barely even touch fillrates.
Bookmarks