Quote Originally Posted by Starscream View Post
read DilTech properly.
He doesnt mean invest as in pure money but he means it as in sending some people with some hardware over to fix the problem.
Cause atm ATI isnt giving any kind of real support to the game developers.

You should see it from the point of view of Ubisoft.
They got a problem making a DX10.1 work properly in their game. There is only 1 company who supports DX10.1 so they ofc go to this one company for help and the company refuses this help.

So instead of putting a broken feature (DX10.1) into the game wich wil shure have loads of people complain they take it out instead.
surprisingly the reviewers didn't find any glitches that would render the game unplayable,what they rather saw was improved framerates with better AA at the cost of some dust.

The company refuses help?Got any official word on that? It's nonsensical to think that they would have refused to support a feature that would have improved performance on their cards.From the rage3d article that posted about the dx10.1 in AC-
Armed with this knowledge, we went and asked ATi about it, since they're probably in the best position to know whether or not the new API is actually implemented. Here's what they had to say:

"Ubisoft are at the forefront of technology adoption, as showcased with the fantastic Assassin’s Creed title. In this instance our developer relations team worked directly with the developer and found an area of code that could be executed more optimally under DX10.1 operation, thus benefiting the ATI Radeon HD 3000 Series."