GlobalFoundries roadmap slips?

[Hans de Vries]

Unfortunately, that's not what Intel said. tgdaily messed it up, by omitting a little detail that makes it true: HK/MG 45nm.

See here:

http://download.intel.com/pressroom/..._FactSheet.pdf

That's the: Let the journalists do the lying trick.. more often used by Otellini..

(By journalists inadvertently omitting just the "little detail")

Journalists wrote for years that: "Intel will not implement 64 bit (in Prescott)"
They were "telling a lie", quoting Otellini but in fact, Otellini never said it,
there was always a "little detail" in the exact wording which they overlooked.


Moore's law doesn't need HKMG at 45nm but see how Otellini again likes
to play with the press: (In this case even good old Mike Magee got fooled)

Let me start with Moore's Law. The pursuit of Moore's Law at Intel is unchanged. It's the foundation for everything we do. We have been on this two-year cadence of new silicon technologies for a long, long time. Two years ago, we introduced the world's first 45-nanometer high-k metal gate silicon technology. To date, we've shipped over two hundred million microprocessors on that process. To date, our competition has shipped zero. Well, we're going beyond that. We're not stopping at 45. The next generation is 32 nanometers. .............
Now, we're not stopping at 32. We've been working on a new technology, the next generation after 32, which is 22 nanometers.
http://download.intel.com/pressroom/...transcript.pdf

Regards, Hans