Page 62 of 91 FirstFirst ... 12525960616263646572 ... LastLast
Results 1,526 to 1,550 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #1526
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    Vantage at high Presets

    3DMark Score H11717 3DMarks
    CPU Score 21501
    Graphics Score 10846

  2. #1527
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    which test number is that?

  3. #1528
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    which test number is that?
    I belive the last one.

  4. #1529
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    It would be gr8 if ud run some game benches. The easiest r the ones with benchmarks already included.

  5. #1530
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    Vantage at High Preset
    GPU TEST 1 33.48
    GPU TEST 2 30.01

    CPU TEST 1 2982.9
    CPU TEST 2 28.31

    FEATURE TEST 1 1879.61
    FEATURE TEST 2 7.63
    FEATURE TEST 3 60.86
    FEATURE TEST 4 29.96
    FEATURE TEST 5 53.00
    FEATURE TEST 6 157.42

  6. #1531
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    Vantage at high Presets

    3DMark Score H11717 3DMarks
    CPU Score 21501
    Graphics Score 10846
    Right between a 4870x2 & GTX295





    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    It would be gr8 if ud run some game benches. The easiest r the ones with benchmarks already included.
    Hes already done DMC4, RE5, 3dV peformance, high, Crysis Warhead, NFS shift, 3d06. He said Shift is smooth at 1080P 8xAA max, and that Crysis warhead is smooth at 1080P max, but slows down with 8xAA.

    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-20-2009 at 08:51 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #1532
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    oh bummer
    I can't run the xtreme bc I have a 23" and it only goes to 1080p, not 1200p sorry guys

  8. #1533
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    I'm afraid to run my Vantage scores because Vantage loves Nvidia from what I read, I just did a run w/o PhysX and scored a P19k...

    I'll do an H run too just to compare, brb.

  9. #1534
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    K well I ran it at 1920x1080 with presets to extreme and 16xAF and 4xAA, I think that is the closest approximation to the Extreme setting.

    I got 8725 GPU score

    and 20988 cpu score

  10. #1535
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    Here's the one I ran w/o PhysX...

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1428570

    I am beginning to think it favors Nvidia now, we need another test.

  11. #1536
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    I reran the above "Extreme" tests but at 8xAA and got

    GPU Score 8605
    CPU Score 21379

    Not much drop in the GPU score going from 4xAA to 8xAA

  12. #1537
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    386
    Many thanks for all the info postumus.

  13. #1538
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    K well I ran it at 1920x1080 with presets to extreme and 16xAF and 4xAA, I think that is the closest approximation to the Extreme setting.

    I got 8725 GPU score

    and 20988 cpu score
    compare to this :



    CPU / GPU scores for i7 920 @ 3.2ghz + 4870x2. I'm starting to see a trend, when compared to the 4870X2 the 5870 is better at extreme resolutions/ AA settings, but it's about the same or marginally better at the performance level and lower resolutions.

    Here is Perlin Noise ALU performance for Lightman

    Vantage feature tests:
    3870, 4870, 5870, GTX260sli

    Texture Fill:
    347, 781, 1880, 1235
    Color Fill:
    3.0, 5.5, 7.63, 11.66
    Parallax Occlusion Mapping:
    7.8, 20.6, 60.86, 64.04
    GPU Cloth:
    8.6, 18.4, 29.96, 28.74
    GPU Particles:
    15.9, 32.6, 53.00, 42.26
    Perlin Noise:
    21.6, 53.8, 157.42, 71.15

    http://forums.overclockers.ru/viewto...278&start=4600
    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-20-2009 at 09:47 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #1539
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    It's looking good so far. I really hope it chews up AA.

  15. #1540
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    crysis 1 dl is now at 70%

  16. #1541
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    Vantage at High Preset
    GPU TEST 1 33.48
    GPU TEST 2 30.01

    CPU TEST 1 2982.9
    CPU TEST 2 28.31

    FEATURE TEST 1 1879.61
    FEATURE TEST 2 7.63
    FEATURE TEST 3 60.86
    FEATURE TEST 4 29.96
    FEATURE TEST 5 53.00
    FEATURE TEST 6 157.42
    Impressive, particularly fill rate and perlin noise!

    Compared to my 8800GTX OC (yeah, i know, but it's what I've got) and i7@3.6...

    Vantage High

    3DMark Score H5448 3DMarks

    CPU Score 22359
    Graphics Score 4806

    GPU TEST 1 14.22
    GPU TEST 2 13.93

    CPU TEST 1 3138.43
    CPU TEST 2 28.52

    FEATURE TEST 1 557.65
    FEATURE TEST 2 4.75
    FEATURE TEST 3 20.37
    FEATURE TEST 4 23.83
    FEATURE TEST 5 28.77
    FEATURE TEST 6 25.42

    This should be a very nice upgrade.
    Last edited by kablooey; 09-20-2009 at 09:34 AM.

  17. #1542
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    crysis 1 dl is now at 70%
    Oh maaaan the suspense!

  18. #1543
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Thanks guys for Vantage scores!

    Perlin noise looks mighty! Either scheduling improvements or shader core itself is faster clock/clock than RV770 series
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  19. #1544
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    Ok I played some more Crysis warhead at 4xAA and it very smooth, and looks incredible at 1920x1080. I don't see an in game option for 8xAF, do I have to force it via CCC?

  20. #1545
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    2,122
    so since these drivers are beta do you all think we will see higher scores with some better support and drivers after release or will it be about the same.
    not saying these are not nice cause they are i cant wait to get a 5870
    ~ Little Slice of Heaven ~
    Lian Li PC-A05NB w/ Gentle Typhoons
    Core i7 860 @ 3gHz w/ Thor's Hammer
    eVGA P55 SLI
    8GB RAM
    Gigabyte 7970
    Corsair HX850
    OZC Vertex3 SSD 240GB

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

  21. #1546
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by postumus View Post
    Ok I played some more Crysis warhead at 4xAA and it very smooth, and looks incredible at 1920x1080. I don't see an in game option for 8xAF, do I have to force it via CCC?
    Run the bench at 4xAA and 8xAF. I'm wondering how smooth it is now vs. a multi-gpu setup, lol.

  22. #1547
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    yeah man of course. Heck the recent CAT's have given some nice performance gains in certain games.

    it can only get better, dont expect massive jumps of coruse, 5-10% max from a driver

    posthumous, can you bench ARMA 2? Im curious to see the gains. This game is very CPU bound though, so im not expecting jaw dropping gains.
    Last edited by strange|ife; 09-20-2009 at 09:52 AM.
    ~

  23. #1548
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    naschasho the bench keeps crashing, that's why I'm dling crysis regular instead, or is there another easy way to bench crysis warhead and what about my question RE 8xAF..

    I was trying to use the "Frame Buffer Crysis Warhead Benchmark Tool"

  24. #1549
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447
    postumus, can you run the two FillRate feature tests from 3DMark'06?

  25. #1550
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    2,122
    Quote Originally Posted by strange|ife View Post
    yeah man of course. Heck the recent CAT's have given some nice performance gains in certain games.

    it can only get better, dont expect massive jumps of coruse, 5-10% max from a driver

    posthumous, can you bench ARMA 2? Im curious to see the gains. This game is very CPU bound though, so im not expecting jaw dropping gains.
    Awesome and yeah i didnt expect a huge change just good to see such a great card coming out. I have only used ati once and its been a while so glad to see them doing good i like the competition both these companies give out.
    ~ Little Slice of Heaven ~
    Lian Li PC-A05NB w/ Gentle Typhoons
    Core i7 860 @ 3gHz w/ Thor's Hammer
    eVGA P55 SLI
    8GB RAM
    Gigabyte 7970
    Corsair HX850
    OZC Vertex3 SSD 240GB

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

Page 62 of 91 FirstFirst ... 12525960616263646572 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •