MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Shin Osaka, Japan
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
    So, when the 5870 is going to be demonstrated in public?

    If the only purpose of having 2900XT was running 3D Mark, than it was priced competitively. Seriously, Radeon 2000 were garbage.

    It was a flop, not only because of the hype, but also because it arrived so late.
    IIRC, it was very competitive with the 8800 GTS (>=) without MSAA. Once you enabled MSAA, however, it got a little murky (<=). This wasn't helped by the terrible drivers at launch time (Again, IIRC, there were times when R580+ managed to outperform R600). I believe several key ATI employees came out saying that they wished drivers were in a much better shape for launch (one of which was Sir Eric Demers, a lead chip architect at ATI).

    Massively oversized, a very leaky 80nm process, no hardware based MSAA resolve, premature drivers and a shortage of texture throughput was R600's undoing, IMO.

    But the $399 price tag, included Black Box bundle and native sound over HDMI interface kept it from becoming a complete disaster.

    EDIT: Changed Orange Box to Black Box.
    Last edited by Wesker; 09-08-2009 at 09:28 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by flippin_waffles on Intel's 32nm process and new process nodes
    1 or 2 percent of total volume like intel likes to do. And with the trouble intel seems to be having with they're attempt, it [32nm] doesn't look like a very mature process.
    AMD has always been quicker to a mature process and crossover point, so by the time intel gets their issues and volume sorted out, AMD won't be very far behind at all.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •