Quote Originally Posted by Cybercat View Post
The difference between DX10.1 and this is NVIDIA was trying to ignore DX10.1. A lot of the optimizations available with it worked on their DX10 hardware, and the only reason I can think of to add support with 40nm chips was because there was no reason not to. Is DX11 even more late than DX10.1 parts? I don't know, does a few months equate to longer than a year plus?
What was the reason for NOT using it on the GT200? I mean, DX10.1 had been out for quite some time when they launched... And four months is pretty bad actually. Especially when those for months consist of Win7 launch AND Christmas season... But of course, they could always say "but we've got CUDA and PhysX so it doesn't matter if loose in everything else.."