Yeah, I'm surprised at how evenly Phenom II and Core 2 Quad are matched. The program was written and tuned on two machines: Pentium D and Harpertown (the only two I had at the time). So I'd expect Intels to run faster. But obviously that isn't really the case.
C2Q is still a tiny bit faster though, but not by much. (Your run is a bit faster because of the newer version.)
Mine isn't much better... 1.6 GHz Core Duo...I think the 25m time is like 120s or so... I'm waiting for some cheap quad-cores...
Mismatched? What were you running before?
EDIT: Nevermind, I see it in your siggy. I suppose you could try some really conservative timings to see what happens...
And no, it isn't a bad score... The fact that you have enough ram to do 1b automatically makes it a good score...since full ram configurations are harder to OC.
EDIT: There isn't really such thing as a good or bad score... since the range of hardware on that list is massive... (From Atom to Gainestown...) So it's only fair to compare with hardware similar to yours.
Bookmarks