Quote Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG View Post
Calling the loop flow 3.47 and having that big number there is a little misleading - I would have put that bar in grey behind each of the individual loop flowrates.

but still great performance nonetheless, nice to have an innovative engineer at the design front of our hobby
I think it is misleading as well, it's comparing two loops total flow to 1 loop. However I believe skinnee said in the other thread he is going to put up a test vs one of the other tops with a Y coming out of it with both loops dumping back into two ports on a different res. That should be a more fair apples to apples comparison, right now we have apples vs oranges.

And yep it is nice to see some innovation in WCing for sure, thanks to Boxgods and thanks to skinnee as well for the hard work