Quote Originally Posted by Sumanji View Post
Oh cool - do you think I should aim higher then? Throw some numbers at me!

Cheers,

Su
If you want to stick to 10x420MHz for the CPU I would run the memory with 3:4 divider on 400MHz strap with CL5, that should be a bit faster than 420MHz CL4.

Quote Originally Posted by LagunaX View Post
OCZ Blade LV 9200's 5-5-5-12 1175 1.8v @ PL7?
YES WE CAN!
P35 can run a lower PL than P45 at the same FSB speed.

Quote Originally Posted by Rayce185 View Post
So I got the PC9600's... But I am a bit dumbfounded by the speed at 333MHz (1:1) compared to the full 600MHz (5:9):


333MHz 5-5-5-18

600MHz 5-5-5-18

By upping the frequencies to FSB 353 and RAM 617 (4:7) and increasing the VRAM to 1.85V (got a BSOD on 1.80) I did get an increase.
But the question remains: How can a 333MHz clock get such a high bandwidth?
FSB speed has only been changed a bit, run a higher FSB and smaller divider, that will give you way more bandwidth. And as mentioned by -n7-, nVidia chipsets are different, the normal rules for Intel chipsets don't apply there.
Try at least 400MHz FSB with 2:3 divider, then run Everest bandwidth test and report back ( please include MemSet in your screenshot ) !