Results 1 to 25 of 730

Thread: OCCT 3.1.0 shows HD4870/4890 design flaw - they can't handle the new GPU test !

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    No, because we know that many have used burn-in programs and achieved 0 problems to only discover stability problems in the games they play. Lets not forget that this is an overclocking venture that many enthusiast use to determine how well they are able to play the games/(non burn in) programs they use most. Not a self serving need to determine if this (or that) program works for them alone. Then based their decision on that program alone there something is wrong (or not) with the hardware.
    i really don't get why people here disregard Tetedeiench efforts so much. it's not like he wanted to produce that gpu failure, he stumpled upon it while creating a gpu stability test.
    instead of investigating the issue everyone claims to know how unrealistic and far away "from real world" situations the benchmark is.

    he indeed discovered a flaw in the design of the 4870/90 that leads to such behavior.

    however, these are just my 2cents.
    Last edited by RaZz!; 05-19-2009 at 02:07 PM.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •