That is what I thought as it explains the benchmark results, so the first run is based purely off the drive's performance and the second run can be read the cache on the controller up to 1gb for example.
Let's say you open photoshop, then open a 1gb file, then close photoshop.
When you then go to open photoshop again does that mean that the performance is dependant on the drives again and not the cache?




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks