http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...TfXKI&refer=uk
first the Danish government now the EU with much higher fees, not so sure if Intel will have a positive revenue this year......
what will be the influence on the US lawsuit?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...TfXKI&refer=uk
first the Danish government now the EU with much higher fees, not so sure if Intel will have a positive revenue this year......
what will be the influence on the US lawsuit?
I think every decision that forces the big players to rethink their cartel like strategies is a good one.
For anyone who doubts wheter Intel really did something wrong, it is no coincidence that Intel is getting in trouble at multiple places. I think the influence on the American case is definately there, but indirectly at best. The case in the US is conerning actions in the US, I presume. The EU and Korea handle their own jurisdiction.
I really hate that the x86 CPU industry is a pure Oligopoly. It is the definition of the term. Barriers to entry are so high, they're Intel-high (thats high!).
Please remove the "land" from the title.
EU isn't an island, it is an entire continent.
Hopefully this accountability can come stateside after the free pass corporations have been getting lately.
Perkam
+1 perkam
I do think its totally correct to use "EU land". Land doesnt automatically mean "island". Or "country" or stuff like that. EU land would mean just a piece of land (opposite to sea/ocean?) that territorially belongs to the EU :p. Dunno, sounds fine to me
X3350 | DFI LP X38 T2R | d9gkx
9800gtx | Raptor1500AHFD/5000AACS/WD3201ABYS
Corsair 620HX | Coolermaster CM690
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
It probably puts some extra pressure on US regulators to put an end to what's been going on. But at the end of the day what happens in the US will be decided by who knows who and what favor they decide to call in. The rule of law is flexible these days, provided you have enough money.
What intel did back in the K8 era was wrong... now they are doing nothing wrong.
Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
—Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.
it actualy isnt ok.
Not all of Europe belongs to the EU. The EU is a grp of countrys that are working together in some areas.
In some ways im happy that the EU is taking care of this. mostly cause the EU is known for proper punishment of corporations that break the law.
Im afraid that in other areas of the world where Intel is facing the same charges they will get away with a slap on the wrist.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Groucho Marx
i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasia
Eurasia is a large landmass covering about 53,990,000 km˛ or about 10.6% of the Earth's surface (36.2% of the land area). Often considered a single continent, Eurasia comprises the traditional continents of Europe and Asia (and Eurasia is a portmanteau of the two).
Just depends on who you talk to.
Either way, this is the wrong time to be trying to squeeze large corporations for Back Door tax increasesThis does NOTHING but drives up costs for the EU consumers because Intel will simply pass on any fine/s to folks buying their products. Unlike the EU, the Koreans aren't stupid enough to try and pull something like that, hince 25 million dollar fine, Intel does away with rebates there. Yes, it will help AMD as well as they'll finally be able to do in courts, something they couldn't do in the Boardroom, raise prices and or get higher ASP's
Meanwhile, the same old scam of rebate companies ripping off Consumers while paying off not only the US, but the EU as well, will continueYes, rebate companies split taxes with the respective governments.
225 euros with 100 euro Rebate, yet you still pay the 10% vat on 225. 22.50 when the tax should have been 10 euros. Who gets the 12.50?
Only some highly delusional or drunk think those folks running the EU are completely honest. One thread you guys say they are, on the thread about TPB, that judge isn't LOL! Talking about having your cake and eating too![]()
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
im more interested in what intel did, and not the definition of EU
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
Well, Perkam started it all.. he should've just let the OP look dumb with the title! (just kidding with ya, Perkam)
--two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
--SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)![]()
Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!
finally intel in trouble
I HATE INTEL !
AMD wouldn't do stupid stuff to intel just to sell more but intel did and i say they are cheap
AMD WILL WIN the LAWSUIT!
Last edited by ownage; 04-23-2009 at 02:55 PM.
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Uhmm..newsflash. AMD=Intel. They would both do the same. AMD even blatantly with benchmarks etc on 65nm K10. Had spec numbers pulled down in disgrace when they was in trouble.
And they make up stuff like:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...-core_duel.pdf
Trust me, one aint better than the other. Both AMD and Intel would stab your eyes out with icepicks if it was legal and gave money. Or just gave money and would most likely not be detected and could be payed with a smallish fine if they did.
Welcome to capitalism.
Also this is EU vs Intel. AMD gets nothing. Intel will get a slap over its fingers at best. Just like MS.
Its also controversal if AMD even lost anything about it. Since AMD sold everything their fabs could make.
Last edited by Shintai; 04-23-2009 at 02:52 PM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
mmm... Not quite sure how a 'comical' pdf, or unrealistic marketing compares to unfair trade practices.. or stabbing people in the eyes for that matter.
The things intel have been convicted of are Illegal.. The PDF, and Bullmarketing are not There's a reason for that. Those things can be easily counter-attacked by Intel. If AMD BS or exagerate performance claims, then fine, launch a marketing campaign to show everyone why it's bs and your product is better... The things intel have done are unable to be counteracted by AMD (legally).
I agree, companies everywhere pull tactics, push the boundries of what's legal, and often are at the least unethical.. it's capitalism, it's business, but neither you or anyone else has proof that "AMD would do the same".. perhaps they would, perhaps they wouldnt. There are Plenty of leading companies out their that DON'T though.
Bookmarks