Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
WAS reset a long time ago. Anounced at the November 2008 Analyst say.

Double confusion caused by Xbit labs. First they blunder by claiming that Bulldozer is near and coming in 2010:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...s_in_2010.html

Instead of admitting their error they claim 3 days later that it's AMD which has which rescheduled Bulldozer.....
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...s_to_2011.html

Both existing and new processor designs are being implemented on 32 nm


Regards, Hans
Exactly,qft.This was similar response I would use to answer Chad's and terrace's posts.

Oh and people don't use Paul's opinion as any credible source when it comes to amd vs intel debate.That dude is defending itanium(or anything made by intel) like it's his own chip design while it's obvious where that one is going to(same place where titanic went back in the day).

As ofr Xbit lab's blunders,this is not the first nor the last one they did. I expect many more in the years to come