The article is quite funny. They go on about "smooth gameplay"

They cant mean Timed demos because those have all concluded that the Intels do tend to do alot better in Min/Avg and Max fps

I can only put it down to them actually playing the games themselves in which case it means the human factor comes into the equation of not following the exact same path or doing the exact same thing.

The last one they say the Phenom II felt smoother yet min fps never dropped below 60fps therefor you wouldnt notice the difference anyway. just like they stated earlier on in the review. They seem to not notice a difference in 9fps in min fps but yet as soon as its a 2fps difference it suddenly "feels" smoother.

The Phenom II certainly seems to be a solid performer but all this "Smoothness" arguement is just a load of crap really. Ive played on Phenom II and C2Q and i dont think either is "Smoother" than the other.