Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
Just reading the language in the "review" is difficult. He's blatantly made up his mind that the chip is a "failure"... Obviously at $275 he should have expected it to outoperform $1k parts, that's legitimate, right? If a reviewer cannot be objective in his conclusions or discussion, we can do without them. I'd much rather preferred to have just seen figures and results, delete the babble.
QFT!