Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
There is a clock for clock review. Lemme go find it, and I'll post the link.

It's definitely not one of these cases where "somebody said it" as informal just spouted off. It's based on an actual review with just about every benchmark one could think of. Some don't like the results obviously, but that won't change the results.

I'll edit thes post with the URL. It was moved so it'll take me a minute or so to find it again.

Edited: Here's the link to the thread about the review ---> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=213200
i have seen it already. the q6600 gets some up on the phenom but not enough to be considered to be better. also phenom II beats it right out of the box where you would have to overclock the q6600 to beat the phenom. and even after that who says the phenom can't overclock past the q6600? if you are saying that the q6600 is better than the phenom II it either needs to A. beat it when both are stock or B. beat it when both are overclocked to their max. since phenom II isn't even out yet we don't know what the average overclock for it will be so you can't be so sure yet but its looking positive. plus since its a new chip it will advance over time after more bios updates and after people know how to use it better. the first phenoms didn't clock very well until after awhile when bios updates came out and people know how to use it. i remember when tony overclocked his 9850BE to 3.5ghz and everyone thought it was amazing. these days its just ehhhhh.