in DX10, Deneb run faster ! AMD come back ! good job !Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr
it was a faulty run at that ss.
I think that you shouldn't bench in DX9.Yes !
in DX10, Deneb run faster ! AMD come back ! good job !it was a faulty run at that ss.
I think that you shouldn't bench in DX9.
When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)by John Fruehe
but you said that all these tests are fake.
What changed now?
NDA ? You still bench !
When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)by John Fruehe
Thank you, OverClocker_gr, for your hard work,but please ignore vietthanhpro. He doesn't want to believe your review simply because the NDA hasn't ended yet.
I guess nothing can convince him now. (And no, he's not lo squartatore. I can confirm it.
)
Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison.When do clock-per-clock comparisons arrive? I don't mean to be impatient, I'm just excited!
im happy with ph2 gaming results, good job amd!
Vozer, I think it is hard for any of us to believe what we see. Stock performance for my current 9850 is great but OC sucks not even 100mhz above stock is stable with 64bit OSes when AMD testers showed Agenas getting 3Ghz out of the box. I getting the 940 come hell or intel but I'm only cautiously optimistic it will get over 3Ghz.
Main Win64; Phen940BE, Sunbeam Cooled, DFI LP790FX-M2R, 2x2G Corsair, R3850XT
Production XP; Athlon 6KBE, GByte POS mobo, 2x2G Gskill 800, R3750XT.
Vista 64 Test; GP9500, ECS740M, 2x2G GSkill, IGP.
Server; 4 X 8347 Opterons, 8x1G Kingston.
XP Home Test; A5000BE X2, ECS RS485M, 2x1G Wintec, IGP.
S&Gs Test; A5000BE X2, ECS A770M-A, A5800 X2, ECS KA3-MVP-580X, 2x1G ?
Good job
Eh...I wonder how a Q6600@2.66GHz can perform in this resolutionI don't want to flame, but I argue with a guy who says that a Q6600@2.66GHz can outperform Phenom II 940 in Crysis (naturally, he is a fan of Crysis and 3DMark
@Vozer: Neverwhere đó à
Last edited by amdcian; 01-02-2009 at 06:57 AM.
HEY! Finnish customers have got few cpu's on their hands today, some of them will get at monday so stay tuned, ill link some retail test from muropaketti when they post those... and theyre not even violating anything, PC shops selling cpu's :P
A64 2800@ 9x279 # Abit kv8pro 3rd EYE (vtt and vmem modded) # 2x256 mb TwinMos memory( with old winbond ch-5 max:240@3.5v) # 2x256mb KHX 3000 memory (with old winbond bh-5 max:270@3.7v)
9600 Pro LE with vgpu mod
Good Job!
Thank you, OverClocker_gr, for your hard work,
Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison.
thanks for the comaro.. only thing i the Cinebench scores for i7 are all wrong?? perhaps you've grabbed 64bit scores for i7, and 32bit for phenom as the i7 scores are higher than they should be if all 32bit.
cheers
Wow, that's disappointing considering your rig. I wonder if it's the board? FYI in my ~3.00 OC, my stability test was installing Vista 64. It's very stable.
Thuban 1090 @ stock
Windows 7 Ultimate
Asus M4A78T-E
8GB OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066mhz RAM
6970 Video Card
2T Hitachi Deskstar Drives
(sheepish look) ASUS Physx Board
Well I've seen on my own 2 940's hitting 3,6-3,7 GHz on air and 100% stable in Vista x64, and these are rather crappy parts.
So don't worry :P
This is news I was waiting for!!
Thanks bedlamite!
I'm using only 64bit OSes on my main RIG because I needed to relocate my XP MCE to HTPC BOX. Besides I'm planning upgrading my rig to 8GB of RAM soon.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
I got the scores from OverClocker_gr's website. Thanks, updated.
Ừ.@Vozer: Neverwhere đó à
plus 1
sb600 here and xp at 3.7 with 1.46
Thank you very much for taking the time to do that, Vozer; however, I was more interested in the clock-per-clock comparisons of Yorkfield to Deneb. I knew Deneb wouldn't catch i7. That thing is Godzilla on steroids.Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison.
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
.
.
i7 860 Batch # L933B378
ASUS Maximus III Formula
Koolance CPU-360
G.Skill 1600 7-7-7-24
Sapphire 5770
i7 860 @ 4.213 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=986383
Phenom II 550 X4 @4.160(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=652117
Phenom II 550 X2 @ 4.1(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=638438
Kuma 7750 @ 3.5....http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560031
Phenom II 940 @4.1<------ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=501007
9850BE@3.6------- http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447465
HAH nice...................................... w0ot
Does AMD's OverDrive apply settings directly to BIOS?
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
when you reboot, bois setting take over. AOD can then reaply the settings on startup if set to do so..
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
some boards can override it in. bios other can't. like jetways 780gx and 780g can override it. while the s790fx boards I've had don't.
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
The Clock per Clock review/s should be out tomorrow
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
no of course not but you can load a profile at startup.
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
Thnx, guys. So some boards can and some boards can't. Gotcha.
StopThe Clock per Clock review/s should be out tomorrowme.
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
HondaGuy I feel like your chips got alot left in it for that voltage.
Specially since your hypertransport and northbridge clock are at stock.
Not to mention you seem to have made skill's with phenom's getting a 9850BE to 3.7
oh Yea there is alot left, like I said just got the thing ,,still tweaking. just wanna make sure I have enough volts,, since Im on water
Temps
Last edited by HondaGuy; 01-02-2009 at 05:27 PM.
i7 860 Batch # L933B378
ASUS Maximus III Formula
Koolance CPU-360
G.Skill 1600 7-7-7-24
Sapphire 5770
i7 860 @ 4.213 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=986383
Phenom II 550 X4 @4.160(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=652117
Phenom II 550 X2 @ 4.1(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=638438
Kuma 7750 @ 3.5....http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560031
Phenom II 940 @4.1<------ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=501007
9850BE@3.6------- http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447465
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks