Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
i really don't know where people are coming from with this whole q6600 > phenom II thing. theres nothing that proves that.


i find it funny that one review comes out and suddenly everyone believes this is phenom IIs fate. we have seen many good things already so i think people need to wait awhile before making conclusions. and to everyone who is bashing phenom II and says it failed. have you ever made a post in the amd forum ever before? it just seems the ones that say it sucks seem to be very uniformed but it won't even matter because whenever phenom II is released everyone will see how it performs. we need more reviews and it needs to actually be released. many people here have had luck with the 9850 and 9950 and the phenom II is way better than both of those so we will have to see how it turns out. as i recall there were many saying that i7 was a fail right before it came out. even intel fanboys. and for reasons like having i7 not being able to use ram with voltage over the cpu voltage. look how that turned out. it doesn't matter at all. just wait until it is actually out before making a conclusion because as the past has shown its not always true.
You have said it 10 times already; why, is it because your daddy works for AMD? I want to see you be so vigilant in all those threads in the AMD section where you and others have argued Deneb is better than Ci7 based on nothing but previews. Here is a real review (call it what you want) that shows a 600mhz disadvantaged kentsfield beating a Deneb in some apps. It stands to reason to thing that a 20% overclock to 3Ghz, would see the kentsfield beating Deneb in more apps. That's the reasoning, especially since you're all about overclocks. Out.