Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: AMD Phenom II cpl questions

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476

    AMD Phenom II cpl questions

    #1 any idea on price
    #2 based on what we have seen with numbers/ super pi and such what is Deneb on par with? What current Intel processor.
    ^-- NOT STARTING A FIGHT. Just figuring out what would be a cheaper upgrade path for myself
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Glow9 how dare you say the word intel in this forum....omg now I said it *gets under the axe*

    But seriously, I'm not sure anyone know's the numbers from what we've seen have been from beating i7 down to barely competing with q6600.

    I feel like it's gonna be between penryn and i7 because for amd to stay afloat they need the good price/performance card up their sleeve like with the ati 4000 series.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    skip the superPI. I think you can putt in slightly above york field and slightly behind in some cases.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    i would guess that the price would be no more than $300 but $200 would be a sweet spot.

    for performance as i have said many times before no one has a clear and definite answer. no matter what people say unless they have used a deneb processor there is no way to tell. theres not much longer to wait until benchmarks are released and i would wait until then before making any speculations.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    I don't see why people use SuperPI as a benchmark nowadays.

    SuperPI favors a single thread with a small/fast L1 cache because of the size of the working set, plus there are faster algorithms and computational design techniques for calculating PI to 1,000,000 digits... QuickPI implementing them.

    I'd say look at the real world benchmarks on applications that people actually use on a day to day basis instead of these.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    I don't see why people use SuperPI as a benchmark nowadays.

    SuperPI favors a single thread with a small/fast L1 cache because of the size of the working set, plus there are faster algorithms and computational design techniques for calculating PI to 1,000,000 digits... QuickPI implementing them.

    I'd say look at the real world benchmarks on applications that people actually use on a day to day basis instead of these.
    tell that to the guys testing their Phenoms II with it
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    I just want oodles of game benches since that's probably the only thing I'll get a kick out of.

    I hope Deneb is on par with Penryn.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    tell that to the guys testing their Phenoms II with it
    this is so they can compare new apples to old apples (deneb <> agena)

    superpi is not for comparing orange to mango (core2q <> IDT Winchip 200)
    The Boss = AMD8120FX - CHV - 16GB DDR3 Vengence 1600LV@1866C9 - AMD7970 - Corsair 850W PSU Corsair FGT-120Gb - Samsung F1 500GB x 2 - Samsung F3 1TB x 1 - Thermaltake Caesar III
    The Workhorse = AMD955BE - Scythe Ninja Rev2 - CHF-III - 16GB DDR3 Vengence 1600LV - AMD6870 - Corsair 430W PSU Corsair F40A - Samsung F1 500GB x 2 - Samsung F3 1TB x 2
    The Slave = AMD Phenom 9850BE - M3A79-T Deluxe - 4Gb OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 - Tagen 480W PSU - XFX AMD5670 - Samsung F1 500GB - Coolermaster 330
    The Apprentice = AMD PhenomII 550BE - XFX890GX - 4Gb Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 - Seagate ST3160316AS - The Unknown Chassis

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Gener_AL (UK) View Post
    this is so they can compare new apples to old apples (deneb <> agena)

    superpi is not for comparing orange to mango (core2q <> IDT Winchip 200)
    Exactly,,

    SuPi comes in handy to See whats gained/lossed when i raise the NB higher or Lower and use higher freqencies on the Same System and not between Two differnt platforms.

    Now using it Comparing the B3 to Deneb and using Pi can be a Usefull since its a good indication of how it will scale on the same type of AMD sytems. Given the NewCPU will be used with same type of Ram and types of Mobos for AM2/AM2+.

    Thats about all id use it for. NOT to COMPARE I to A
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    True it's comparing apples to apples but its comparing them using a bad method. No one needs improvements in SuperPI.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153

    Better than i7 965 in Crysis?

    Well, you asked for a benchmark in the AMD forum so here it is from a participant at the Boston AMD event.

    Quote Originally Posted by EnJoY View Post
    .....Lastly, it's important to mention that in the Core i7 965 system vs Phenom II 940 BE Crysis comparison, I was able to verify that both systems were running the exact same graphical settings, with the same cards. Phenom II had 4GB of ram, dual channel while the Core i7 had 3GB in triple channel on an X58 Intel reference board. The Phenom II had higher frame rates throughout the majority of the gameplay.
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by gOtVoltage View Post
    Exactly,,

    SuPi comes in handy to See whats gained/lossed when i raise the NB higher or Lower and use higher freqencies on the Same System and not between Two differnt platforms.

    Now using it Comparing the B3 to Deneb and using Pi can be a Usefull since its a good indication of how it will scale on the same type of AMD sytems. Given the NewCPU will be used with same type of Ram and types of Mobos for AM2/AM2+.

    Thats about all id use it for. NOT to COMPARE I to A
    None the less those comparisons to the old have been done against Intel already meaning you can compare the new to Intel as well.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211
    Look what THG brought in We Overclock Phenom II to 4.9GHz plus SuperPi result


  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    As others already said, leave SuperPI, seriously.

    I expect PhII to be around Yorkfield. Sometimes higher, sometimes lower. I guess at this point IMC and HT will help PhII slightly over Yorkfield.

    Maybe for gaming it might be close to i7, but dont quote me on that. Reason I think this is that i7 doesnt have this huge advantage over Yorkfield in gaming and most important, i7 was mainly meant to get Intel back in the server market and not to enlarge gamers e-peens

    Since it takes still quite a while for i5 to be released I think PhII does have a certain chance to compete strongly with that, at least in performance. Some people said i5 would be cheap, but whether it's cheap compared to i7 or just cheap

    But to be honest, it comes down a bit what other parts you're looking to get. There are very cheap Intel boards (for skt 775), but for the same price you got top boards from AMD. However, there's a certain quality difference between top Intel and AMD boards.
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    Very nice

    Just a shame of the poor RAM and NB settings though. But well, in order to compare it you cant have countless different RAM and NB settings. Quite curious though how it would be with some better tweaking
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    #1 any idea on price
    #2 based on what we have seen with numbers/ super pi and such what is Deneb on par with? What current Intel processor.
    ^-- NOT STARTING A FIGHT. Just figuring out what would be a cheaper upgrade path for myself
    hi there glow,

    you ahve a real knack of making threads that already have the answer(s) elsewhere in the forum, the cost of Phenom has been discussed, (you included)

    and as for on a par with, pfff

    pleaseeee

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    hi there glow,

    you ahve a real knack of making threads that already have the answer(s) elsewhere in the forum, the cost of Phenom has been discussed, (you included)

    and as for on a par with, pfff

    pleaseeee
    I haven't heard anything written in stone. Who went to the AMD shin dig in Chicago?
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Cruncher Russ_64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    850
    OP's #1 question was price - indications in UK are that the 920 will be just below 200GBP and the 940BE just under 250GBP and given the comparision quoted above the 940BE is on a par with the i7-965 which costs around 875GBP (ie. triple the price before adding new MB and DDR3) - I say that is the best deal of the decade
    Asus Maximus VIII Ranger Z170 : Core i5-6600K : EVGA RTX2080 XC : 16Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 : 256Gb Crucial MX500 : Corsair H100i : PCP&C 750w 60A : CM Cosmos S : Windows 10 x64
    Asus Z8NA-D6 : Dual Xeon E5645 : 24Gb DDR3-1333 ECC : MSI GTX470 : 120Gb Samsung EVO 840 : 1TB HDD : PCP&C 750w 60A : CM Stacker : DD MC-TDX, EK-FC470, RX240+RX120, D5 X-Top, BayRes : VMware ESXi 6.7.0 - VM's - WCG crunchers x 5 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS), Mint 19, Windows 10 Insider Preview
    Sophos XG 17.5.3 running on GA-Z97-Wifi : Core i3 : 8Gb DDR3-1600 : 120Gb SSD : Corsair H80
    BenQ GW2765, Aten 4-port KVM, Asustor AS5002 4Tb NAS, Belkin 1500va UPS, Sky Fibre Max 80/20Mbps


  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ_64 View Post
    OP's #1 question was price - indications in UK are that the 920 will be just below 200GBP and the 940BE just under 250GBP and given the comparision quoted above the 940BE is on a par with the i7-965 which costs around 875GBP (ie. triple the price before adding new MB and DDR3) - I say that is the best deal of the decade
    So the 940be is going to be on par with a i7-965?

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ_64 View Post
    OP's #1 question was price - indications in UK are that the 920 will be just below 200GBP and the 940BE just under 250GBP and given the comparision quoted above the 940BE is on a par with the i7-965 which costs around 875GBP (ie. triple the price before adding new MB and DDR3) - I say that is the best deal of the decade
    Don't we wish!

    AMD putting pricing pressure on Intel like they did to Nvidia.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    So the 940be is going to be on par with a i7-965?
    Nah, the 965 fails cause of its price
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    It's priced like that because enough people still buy it .

    I wonder how the 920 will be priced.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    So the 940be is going to be on par with a i7-965?
    in gaming it will according to the benchmarks.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  24. #24
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    @ glow 9 if you can wait wait for am3
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
    in gaming it will according to the benchmarks.
    What benchmarks?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •