Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
your welcome..



great here i go again.. confusing the crap outta people

youre twisting that this could be 6x instead of 4x?.. unbelievable

this thread is all about 4x.. removed the 2x since it takes alot of time to do all this.. i wish i could edit the title i cant.. i didnt include any 6x in the thread.. all 4x = 64GB

4x false ? right cause im the one posting all this it must be false.. thanks alot!

manufacturer spec for the masterdrive px is 170/130 read/write

whose to say thats the limit? they probably were conservative or they upgraded their px line

p serial # performing @ 40MB/s read higher than r serial #

why is 1x @ 188MB/s read on the arc1210 which is only 256MB ??

again, how you explain that mr. One_Hertz ??

of course again you wont..
You are the one with the 6x comment that I quoted before (that you edited out now). That is the only place i took 6 drives from.

I really don't want to burst your bubble but I can bet any amount of money that you are not seeing 209MB/s sequential writes from each of your drives, like one of your benchies shows. 188mb/s reads is closer to reality, but still not real. If you know the first thing about SSDs you will realize how absurd it is to claim that your drives are able to write at faster speeds than to read. Unfortunately I do not think you do. The writes you are showing are a good deal faster than the Intel SLC drive. Manufacturers are not idiots and will not under rate their drives. Whatever controller you put on there will still be limited by how quickly the drive performs the operations sent to it; that part never changes.

Open your eyes. 600-650 seq reads and 500-550 seq writes is the best you can possibly see from 4 of those drives, regardless what you hook them up to.