MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 397

Thread: AMD Shows Deneb (Phenom II) pictures of 6.2GHz CPUz etc

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Cyph3r View Post
    I don't think that's real, for one, 500ghz is ridiculous (simply because not even intel has bothered to try for that when they had a goal of 10ghz stock cpus, it would require way too much power to run, you'd be better off going for efficiency, and for another, just that it is some 490ghz above the world record for the p4 makes it even less plausible when the p4 was designed for ghz), for another, it talks about sony waiting to use the 500ghz cpus for the PS3 which we know for a fact did not happen (the article is from 2006), probably just some joke
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    I don't think that's real, for one, 500ghz is ridiculous (simply because not even intel has bothered to try for that when they had a goal of 10ghz stock cpus, it would require way too much power to run, you'd be better off going for efficiency, and for another, just that it is some 490ghz above the world record for the p4 makes it even less plausible when the p4 was designed for ghz), for another, it talks about sony waiting to use the 500ghz cpus for the PS3 which we know for a fact did not happen (the article is from 2006), probably just some joke
    500Ghz is easy as such...for a few transistors. But making 1 billion of them go at 500ghz is..a whole other story.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    500Ghz is easy as such...for a few transistors. But making 1 billion of them go at 500ghz is..a whole other story.
    It's not the point(the sheer Ghz).The point is that ICs can work at such a low temps as IBM showed back in 2006,the thing you said was not possible.

    edit: ...and he goes offline
    Last edited by informal; 12-07-2008 at 11:54 AM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    It's not the point(the sheer Ghz).The point is that ICs can work at such a low temps as IBM showed back in 2006,the thing you said was not possible.

    edit: ...and he goes offline
    Uhm..no? They didnt show a CPU running at -269 or -270C. No CMOS anywhere
    Plus the the chip wasnt near absolute zero for sure. However they used the helium instead of LN2 etc as a more functional and controlled cooling (Plus helium is an inert gas unlike nitrogen). Its not just puring it down into a pot like with OC here. 350Ghz at room. 500Ghz cooled. But overdramatizing sells.

    Here is also the actual article from NYtimes. And without the fake pic.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/te...chip.html?_r=1

    And enjoy this
    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060622-7117.html

    And here is the actual pictures:
    http://www.gatech.edu/upload/pr/tyf16878.jpg
    http://www.gatech.edu/upload/pr/tzt16879.jpg

    Its a 500Ghz radio transmitter basicly.

    Ofcourse you could just use field effect transistors....
    Last edited by Shintai; 12-07-2008 at 01:03 PM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Think we are still talking CPU's here and that 500GHZ post is such a joke... why do some hold onto it ? think the person that googled it was also not aware of the real story behind that nice eyecatching title...the guy that chose that title must be a reporter of the Inq now or maybe of the Sun...

    Give it all a rest... this thread is really getting nowhere with all this non stop posting about nothing... would be nice if a moderator cleaned up these threads and removed the zillions of useless posts... I have no clue what the point is of some posts : to show that you are more literate then another person, more technical skilled,...to show off how clever you seem to be ?

    Thx V_rr for some early results... at least something usefull in this thread...

    What do you all expect AMD to do from a part that hasn't officially launched yet? There are enough people who can be trusted that showed up at the event and saw everything with their own eyes. I believe that more than what I just described above.
    Still shows me no proof about the discussion if the cpu's were also preselected or not (which so many seem to defend here that AMD did NOT preselect anything), if they had disabled certain stuff in the CPU to get it running faster etc... AMD seems to have something up their sleeve and I'm looking forward to it... BUT if it just is able to equal current socket 775 CPU's (Oc'ed ofcourse) then they remain a step behind and Intel will continue to dominate the OC'ing scene (I care zilch about servers, laptops etc...)
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 12-07-2008 at 01:04 PM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    BUT if it just is able to equal current socket 775 CPU's (Oc'ed ofcourse) then they remain a step behind and Intel will continue to dominate the OC'ing scene
    Wrong if it can equal current socket 775 CPU but can OC higher it can be an interesting alternative on the OC'ing scene.
    Last edited by AbelJemka; 12-07-2008 at 01:47 PM.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Wrong if it can equal current socket 775 CPU but can OC higher it can be an interesting alternative on the OC'ing scene.
    so true, i7 platforms cost 2 times more than amd ones
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •