Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
That is because you guys aren't mentally unbalanced.
Hahaha, clueless

Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
If deneb really rocks it will be amazing to see how fast the review sites become unbiased again and stop being paid Intel pumpers in some peoples eyes lol. Reviews and benches will start to matter again and performance of the cpu will actually become important again, AHHH good times.
If you would have read several arguments correctly according this issue, you would see benchmark results were often not even being crapped with but something else. But since you couldnt care to read those arguments back then, Ive no single reason to post them right now

Anyway, cut it. Either do care or do not care, but dont talk a bit here and be ignorant a bit there.

Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
You always say the same to justify the lack of perfomance.
Oh wait, so SuperPI actually does care?

Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
Phenom underperforms in almost everything compared to a similar clocked C2Q, not only in SuperPi. And C2Q are usually clocked much higher.
Ah, now I get it. Some numbers are apparently 'the' justification not to get a K10? Besides that, there's still a huge difference between underperforming and performing less really. Ive ran my 9850BE stock for several months, and Ive yet to discover any performance issues. Of course higher clocks are very welcome, but dont act like it's crap because the numbers how it performs less

Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
Oh I missed this one. So being a "Legend" automatically implies he's right? Please answer this question of you don't mind.
No, Tony has to be independed, so he actually cant just go spread out lies really. Also the chance he's right is a lot higher than the average poster in this thread

Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
I was shocked. I thought Tony was joking or being sarcastic. Funny how when AMD ran it faster, it was important.
SuperPI is only... relevant when you compare eventual steppings or what so ever. Then still it's questionable. When AMD ran faster it wasn't of any performance for me really. Also Ive yet to see any proof of the group of people you're aiming at