Phenom 2 introduction in January with 125W TDP and then in Feb they will introduce new ones with a TDP of only 95W?
talk about getting punished for early adoption, anyway, if the 95W ones oc as good as intel cpu's then they might mark the beginning of the Comeback of AMD in the Enthusiast Community.
Nah that's a little too harsh. Don't want them to fail. Just wanna see some screenshots.![]()
Last edited by T_Flight; 11-17-2008 at 01:46 AM.
might be a bit of short upgrade, but that's up to those to decide if a move to ddr3 is in a shorttime frame or not. At least later versions are ddr2+dd3 compatible, for a system with onboard mem controller that's great added value.
the ones in february do not list the 125tdp package either, so not a full list, will be depending process wise and competition wise this is never done.
as usual in AMD threads a MOD is needed time to time to clean up. Looking at your sig I would rather call it wastedom
I wander if you said the same at the i7 threads, they have the same early adoption TDP rate![]()
pics + numbers
95W...finally something from AMD to kill the q6600
a nice rig, and cheaper than Nehalem i will guess.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
It is a nice upgrade path for those whom already have an AM2+ motherboard, my little brother wouldn't mind to see his 5000+ BE being replaced by something like this. If you have to buy a new motherboard to support this CPU, then yes it is a very short upgrade path.
Don't feel so offended by T_Flight, he's just joking and not being serious. Can't we just have some fun and sarcasm around here once in a while? There is no need to defend some company when someone makes a joke about it. I don't mind it if someone gets a bit defensive when someone is spreading some false information about some company, but a simple joke should be allowed.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
so does anyone know if PhenomII + R600 will do 30,000 in 3dmark?
sure, if you can find a phenom clockable to 5.5 ghz, and r600 @ 1.1ghz crossfire
or 5ghz with dual 4870x2@ 850mhz (around)
system:
Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
xigmatek achilles
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
x-fi xtrememusic
rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
320gb/250gb/500gb samsung
I really hope AMD is back on track with this... my old AMD rig needs to be replaced soon...
I just hope that somewhere out of the bloom they release a similar chipset to X58.. no more pondering whether to go XF or SLi... but seeing them owning ATi hell will freeze over first...
Regardless... if the new line up touches the I7 I'm sticking with AMD... if not I'll be going to the other side...![]()
Lian Li V2000+ Modded
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8Ghz 1.325v Thermaltright Ultra 120 Extreme RT1366
Asus Rampage Extreme 2
OCZ 3x2GB DDR3 1600 Platinum
EVGA GTX460 768MB 850/1700/2100Mhz SLi
EVGA 8800GT SSC 730/1800/2000Mhz
Corsair HX850W
There is nothing special about X58 that makes it support both SLI and CFX, that was merely a decision made by NVIDIA because they would otherwise loose the high-end market to ATI as NVIDIA does not have a chipset with a QPI interface. NVIDIA could easily allow SLI to run on an AMD 790FX chipset if they wanted to, but they just don't want to as this will make their own AMD chip sets less attractive. The same goes for the X38 and X48 chipsets, there is nothing in the chips that makes it impossible for SLI to run on those chips and it's a decision made by NVIDIA to not provide SLI support on those chips. This restriction is made at the driver level, the chipset drivers for NVIDIA chipsets don't allow CFX to run on NVIDIA's chipsets and the video card drivers of NVIDIA don't allow SLI to run on anything but NVIDIA chipsets and certain Intel X58 motherboards.
BTW, the Intel Smackover board does not have SLI support as Intel simply did not want to pay NVIDIA to allow SLI certification. If you certify your X58 to be used with SLI, you get a special BIOS code by NVIDIA which you have do integrate into your BIOS and then NVIDIA's drivers will check for this code to allow SLI. Maybe someone can hack this code into Intel's Smackover BIOS, although I don't think it will be easy to do.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Nothing for nothing man but I cannot understand this local mentality of Phenom = FailureI have the First AMD SB600 board released and a Phenom 9600 (B2) and its all at stock currently and has been that way for a while now due to no time to O.C because of shortage of time in life in general currently. I can honestly say I have had not issue one with this Board or CPU not once! Even at stock its not by any means slow in any respect ......encoding video, music , gaming , etc ,etc, so I have no idea why most of you fellas have such reverence and hatred towards AMD.........WHY??????????
![]()
Last edited by Brother Esau; 11-17-2008 at 05:59 AM.
SuperMicro X8SAX
Xeon 5620
12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~
mainly because they all play SuperPi all day long brotherLOL
We have a launch even today for i7 and I bet they show SuperPi there...as if in the whole scale of things it friggin matters.
volume sales are what matters, cost Vs performance...AMD proved with 4XXX GPU cards they could win at this, and I am sure they have a plan for Phenom 2 going in the same direction.
XS news is not really the place to talk about AMD anymore...every thread in the news section usually ends up going the same way
Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
Have a look over here
Tony AKA BigToe
Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast
Last edited by Brother Esau; 11-17-2008 at 06:25 AM.
SuperMicro X8SAX
Xeon 5620
12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~
Don't say to us old timers bye-cracky, hehehe! That's just my resent history to prove a point. My first real computer was a Commie 64 in 1983, then an Atari 800XL, 286, 386 both built from the scrap in while I learned computers but they didn't belong to me. My next modern was an Pentium 100MHz about 15 years ago. I'm not exactly sure but the rest look something like, AMD-PR 150, Intel 133 & 166, Intel 200, 200 Pentium Pro, K-5 300, K6-2 380 replaced by a 400MHz K6-2 that really that actually worked at the advertised FSB, K6-3 400MHz as well I think. So add those before the other history. Either way, I've own more AMD than processors than Intel.
I'd also take trade-in on upgrades and have 3 to 12 computers waiting to be given away or sold. I donate them to various organizations like the Boys & Club, Local Recreation Centers, Women's shelters and etc.... I usually run 4 computers in my home. That's why i'm not so in a hurry for Quad Core.
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
Go AMD!
Intel E8400.C0 "Wolfe"| 400x9 3600 Mhz @ 1.272 Vcore
TT Sonic Tower | Dual 120mm Antec Fans | Silent Air @ 1200 RPM
ASUS P5Q-E | BIOS 0610
G.Skill F2-8000CL5-2GBPQ | 400 MHz (5-5-5-15) @ 2.0 V (? Auto)
XFX 7800GT
Wester Digital Raptor 74GB | Maxtor Maxline III 300GB | Seagate 7200.7 120GB
Antec P-180 | Antec True Power 2.0 550W
Dell 2407 | Dell 2405
CPU: Q9450 @3.6GHz (lapped) Cooling: Scythe Zipang (lapped)
RAM: Mushkin (996580) 2x2gb XP2-6400 @5-5-5-15, DDR2-1080 Mobo: Asus Rampage Formula (Bios 0410), tRD=7
GPU: EVGA GTX 280 @712/1512/2700 PSU: Enermax Modu82+ 625 Optical Drive: LG Electronics GGC-H20L
HDD: 1x 160GB Intel X-25M G2, 1x VelociRaptor, 2x Samsung SpinPoint F1 640GB in 2x CM STB-3T4-E3-GP 4-in-3 cages
Sound: Focusrite Saffire PRO 24 DSP / Grace Design M903 Speakers: M-Audio BX8a Deluxe, Shure SE535, Ultrasone Pro 900 w/ custom cable & dual entry mod, HD 800
Case: Cooler Master Stacker 832 w/ 7x S-Flex SFF21F fans on 2x Zalman ZM-MFC1 Plus controllers
Monitor: NEC MultiSync 24WMGX3 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
Why do you always bring this up? Are you even serious?
Their cpu is 15-25% slower across the board and consuming way more power. The launch featured more bad PR and lies than Iraq's information minister? Even though it was a nice chip after it matured a bit and was priced competetively, but it still almost ruined them. It was a failure, stop beating the horse, get over it.
Your equation of anarchy = bad is even more characteristic for the "illiterate American" than you think.![]()
Originally Posted by freecableguy
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
Bookmarks