MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 94

Thread: First Shanghai benchmark results.

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by duploxxx View Post
    there are lots of benches on that site with different amount of instances. off course when you think its convenient for your narrowed view you bring it up, well it isn't:

    Intel Corp. Super Micro Computer, Inc. Supermicro 6025B-TR+ (Intel Xeon processor E5345) BEA JRockit(R) 1.6.0_02 (build P27.4.0-10-90053-1.6.0_02-20071009-1827-windows-x86_64, compiled mode) 2 419 Text HTML
    Intel Corp. Super Micro Computer, Inc. Supermicro 6025B-TR+ (Intel Xeon processor E5345) BEA JRockit(R) 1.6.0_02 (build P27.4.0-10-90053-1.6.0_02-20071009-1827-windows-x86_64, compiled mode) 4 435 Text HTML


    to the world, the days of 32bit and less then 4gb ram are over...but perhaps for some it takes some time to evolve.

    choosing between 4 times 4 or 8 times 2 is 25% difference in ram price. lots of reasons since only minor amount will ever upgrade memory.
    Why are you posting 65nm Xeon numbers? And cant we agree that if you are so honest and clearly. You would bench it all with the same settings. Yet they didnt.

    And did you even notice the 2 numbers you posted are on different confs? Both memory amount and speed.

    Tell me how many servers that need more than 2 or 4GB. Besides DB servers.

    Not even to talk about 16GB vs 8.

    You didnt instantly throw 16GB memory in your desktop either did you with x64?
    Last edited by Shintai; 11-09-2008 at 11:41 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •