Results 1 to 25 of 317

Thread: Deneb just around the corner?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    Deneb is just a shrink with some extra cache,
    The "it's only a die shrink" people remind me of the movie "Life of Brian" about the Romans.

    "Deneb is just a shrink. Well okay they did add some cache. Oh yeah and they also increased it to 48-way instead of 32-way. And yes they also probably optimized some of the routines in the processor. And changed cool and quiet for efficiency. Perhaps they tweaked the HT. And perhaps they worked on things we don't know about. But other than those minor things it's just a shrink so what can we expect."
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by keithlm View Post
    The "it's only a die shrink" people remind me of the movie "Life of Brian" about the Romans.

    "Deneb is just a shrink. Well okay they did add some cache. Oh yeah and they also increased it to 48-way instead of 32-way. And yes they also probably optimized some of the routines in the processor. And changed cool and quiet for efficiency. Perhaps they tweaked the HT. And perhaps they worked on things we don't know about. But other than those minor things it's just a shrink so what can we expect."
    So what is your fearless prediction for IPC improvement for Deneb over Phenom?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    So what is your fearless prediction for IPC improvement for Deneb over Phenom?
    Why should I make one because of a request from a known Intel fanhat?

    You don't appear to accept what would be a logical amount even if it was "just a shrink" as you claim; attempting to understand anything more than that might push past the limits of your abilities.
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by keithlm View Post
    Why should I make one because of a request from a known Intel fanhat?

    You don't appear to accept what would be a logical amount even if it was "just a shrink" as you claim; attempting to understand anything more than that might push past the limits of your abilities.
    Ahhhh so you are all bluster and are easily exposed when called upon it.

    Face it, Deneb will clearly have less IPC than Penryn and will be lucky to equal Conroe.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    Ahhhh so you are all bluster and are easily exposed when called upon it.

    Face it, Deneb will clearly have less IPC than Penryn and will be lucky to equal Conroe.
    Face it, everyone with a supporting motherboard has a new upgrade option without having to buy a brand new motherboard and DDR3.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    Face it, everyone with a supporting motherboard has a new upgrade option without having to buy a brand new motherboard and DDR3.
    Sure.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    Ahhhh so you are all bluster and are easily exposed when called upon it.

    Face it, Deneb will clearly have less IPC than Penryn and will be lucky to equal Conroe.
    IPC is not everything.

    One of my expert friend says that the main problem with the K10 is in the memory subsystem. So I hope they could achieve some improvements in it.

    Interesting performance analysis between Core 2 and K8. http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?Ar...2808015436&p=1

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    Ahhhh so you are all bluster and are easily exposed when called upon it.

    Face it, Deneb will clearly have less IPC than Penryn and will be lucky to equal Conroe.
    Because I do not wish to open a dialog with you I am all "bluster" and "exposed".

    You do realize that you are starting to look pathetic don't you?


    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    I can't help it if you have silly ideas, including that I must be an Intel boy.
    It would be hard to review this thread and NOT come to the conclusion that you are a helpless Intel fanhat.
    Last edited by keithlm; 11-06-2008 at 03:20 PM.
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    It appears you are one of these troubled souls who can only see people as either being an eternal Intel or AMD fan, rather than just someone who will ALWAYS buy the best processor regardless of who makes it.
    Actually I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

    I shall attempt to put this in simple words that even someone with your diminished level of intelligence can understand: If you are NOT an Intel fanboy then you are something worse; you are someone trolling only for the purpose of causing negative responses and having no other purpose.

    (Which you are increasingly proving to be true with each every one of your posts.)

    Oh and BTW: Welcome to my ignore list. You do not have anything to contribute... therefore begone pest.
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by keithlm View Post
    Actually I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

    I shall attempt to put this in simple words that even someone with your diminished level of intelligence can understand: If you are NOT an Intel fanboy then you are something worse; you are someone trolling only for the purpose of causing negative responses and having no other purpose.
    What an atrocious understanding you have of discussion forums and debates in general.

    Due to your AMD Fanaticism you are demanding that no scrutiny ever be applied to outrageously optimistic predictions about AMD products, that this forum should only be about praising AMD.


    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    amd stated themselves that there will be a 15-20% ipc boost. as far as i have seen no one here has said of any boost greater than that.
    Well I maintain that is an unrealistic expectation for across the board performance increases.

    no one here has made over the top performance predictions.
    Claiming 15 to 20% is over the top in my view.

    and its more than just a shrink and more cache.
    Everytime a company shrinks and adds cache they will do some tidy up of the existing design and it never results in major improvements, so I am sticking with my description of it just being a shrink and cache addage.

    BTW, If I am wrong about how much Deneb improves, I will come on here and readily concede that.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •