Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
Thanks for clearing that up to those of you not being a jerk, I still think that other chips with larger caches there is a clear benefit. If there wasn't I doubt AMD would have chose to increase Denebs as much as they did. See I agree with Yukon here and looking to the pictures of the heatsink and fan that thing must be running hooooooooooot
You agree with what?All he said is "1.6V for 4Ghz ...w00t? " .
You are not making any sense,apart from making yourself look uneducated with those clueless cache/design comments you made.Now you make another clueless comment without even seeing in what contest the latest 4Ghz shot was made(a preview of maximum clock is not going to be done with stock cooling,would it? great find Columbus )

Deneb is running much cooler and draws much less power than 65nm Agena.We know this as a fact from August(the earliest C0 stepping,C2 will be better):
http://en.hardspell.com/doc/showcont...58&pageid=3150

Idle:


Deneb draws 21% less power than same clock/same volts Agena!
So idle testing shows you are wring,yet again!Sigh...

Load:


104/57=1.81 ,so Deneb draws 81% less power than same clock/same volts Agena! That's almost 2x less!!!
Now your claim about Deneb running hot is not only busted,it's shattered...Sigh 2nd time..