Results 1 to 25 of 1572

Thread: Nehalem-EP......BLOOMFIELD

Threaded View

  1. 10-10-2008, 10:17 AM #10
    Jacky
    Jacky is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    Programs will start a second if not 0.5 faster (responsiveness) like AMD systems.
    AMD systems are not more responsive than Intel systems and if they are it's not due to the IMC. The difference between AMD and Intel (core 2 duo) systems in memory latency is maybe 50ns vs 100ns, the difference is ~100ns at best. 100ns = 0,0001 (edit: add 3 more zeros then it should be correct) seconds! Intel systems are similar or faster in any other regard so it is impossible.
    Neither do programmes start 0.5-1s faster with AMD systems, if this was the case hundreds of reviews all over the net would have pointed it out. Loading times are a function of hard disk speed, I don't believe they are in any way capped by current hardware - at least as long as you're not using SSD-RAIDS.

    Ask JJ if you don't believe me. I'm pretty sure of that though...

    Personally I'm wondering what is going on with TMPGEnc 4.5, SMT results in 28% lower performance! How is this possible?
    Last edited by Jacky; 10-10-2008 at 10:41 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules