Page 46 of 179 FirstFirst ... 36434445464748495696146 ... LastLast
Results 1,126 to 1,150 of 4457

Thread: ASUS Maximus II Formula - new P45 king?

  1. #1126
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    20
    Thx a lot cryptik for your explaination to me...hope it may help me a lot to "conquer" this motherboard...
    I could make this motherboard stable at 550FSB but it just for CPU stressing but not for RAM...
    maybe..our problem right now is on the NB setting...I also can't find the exact calculation for NB at this motherboard...
    Hoping soon Asus could fix the BIOS for us...I still believe this motherboard will be the king of Intel P45 chipset...
    Intel Core i7 920 with TRUE BLACK
    DFI LanParty UT X58-T3eH8
    Sapphire Radeon HD 4870x2
    GSkill F3-12800CL8T-6GBHK (Samsung HCFO)
    Western Digital Raptor 74GB x 2 @RAID 0
    Thermaltake Toughpower Cable Management 850W
    Thermaltake Kandalf LCS
    Samsung SyncMaster 2233sw
    Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 64-Bit

  2. #1127
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,035
    Yes the MCH (NB) seems to be a little weak, it needs more voltage than the MCH on my P5Q-Deluxe did for the same FSB, ram speed and PL.

    Oh btw the calculation for NB GTL Ref is the same as for the cpu GTL Ref. Standard (auto) is 0.64x Vtt + 0mv (Vtt is what you set for vFSB, vFSB and Vtt are the same thing), so if you are using 1.20v vFSB, and have NB GTL Ref set to auto (+ 0mv) it is
    so 0.64 x 1.20v = 0.768v.
    To make the voltage what a 0.67x multiplier would give you, it is
    0.67 x 1.2v = 0.804v
    0.804 - 0.768v = 0.036v
    0.036v = 36mv
    so select +40mv as it is the closest to 36mv in the bios.

    Just substitute what you are using for vFSB for 1.20v I used in the above equation to work it out for you. If you have trouble, just tell me what your vFSB is and I'll work it out for you
    Ci7 990X::Rampage III Extreme::12GB Corsair Dominator 1866C7GT::2 x EVGA SC Titans in SLI::Corsair AX1200::TJ07::Watercooled
    Ci7 920 3849B018::Rampage II Extreme::6GB GSKILL Trident 2000C9 BBSE::EVGA GTX580::Antec Signature SG850::TJ09::Aircooled w/TRUE 120X

  3. #1128
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Anyone running this board with either a QX9650 or Q9650 that has gotten to 500FSB or 450x10? I am thinking about replacing my Blitz with this board, but if I am not going to get anything higher than my 4Ghz then I will just wait or try a different board. I did a search for these two chips and did not see anything higher than 4Ghz with this board.

    Thanks,

    Utnorris
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  4. #1129
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    20
    Okay Cryptik I'll try that first...
    Thank you anyway...
    Intel Core i7 920 with TRUE BLACK
    DFI LanParty UT X58-T3eH8
    Sapphire Radeon HD 4870x2
    GSkill F3-12800CL8T-6GBHK (Samsung HCFO)
    Western Digital Raptor 74GB x 2 @RAID 0
    Thermaltake Toughpower Cable Management 850W
    Thermaltake Kandalf LCS
    Samsung SyncMaster 2233sw
    Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 64-Bit

  5. #1130
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mansfield TX
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Anyone running this board with either a QX9650 or Q9650 that has gotten to 500FSB or 450x10? I am thinking about replacing my Blitz with this board, but if I am not going to get anything higher than my 4Ghz then I will just wait or try a different board. I did a search for these two chips and did not see anything higher than 4Ghz with this board.

    Thanks,

    Utnorris
    QX9650 was tried but 500FSB was not possible. It topped out @498 bootable from bios with both a Q9450 & QX9650. 495FSB was benchmark stable but 475FSB has proven prime stable for me. This is not the board to pair with a QX9650. The unlocked multiplier deserves a fast performing chipset i.e. x38 or x48. This board however is a perfect match for Q9X50's as it can reach 475+ FSB stable so you should be able to hit 4GHz stable with a Q9550 or greater. Performance wise though, its no match for the other chipsets.
    Praetor
    » Intel i7 2600K 3103B306 » Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z » Asus GTX 470's TRi-SLI » Corsair Dominator GT CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Corsair 800D
    » Cooling : Swiftec Apogee XT » Swiftec MCP350-DDC1 w/XSPC Dual DDC Bay Reservoir » Swiftech MCR320-QP w/Scythe SlipStreams 110CFM

    The Yamato
    » Intel i7 920 3849B028 or i7 980X » Asus Rampage III Extreme Black Edition » Asus HD6970's QuadFireX or Asus GTX 570's 4way SLI » 6GB Corsair Dominator GT TR3X6G1866C7GTF » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Microcool Banchetto 101
    » Cooling : Dragon F1 Extreme Edition(LN2) » Custom SS by RunMc »


  6. #1131
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,035
    The P45 does require some aggressive FSB speeds and lowest possible bootable PL to get decent performance. If you have a CPU that can run 550 x 7.5 (4125) stable you could pull some nice 3D bench scores. My CPU will do it on ~1.344v, but I'd have to give it ~1.36 - 1.38v for total stability in 3D, which is more voltage than I'm comfortable with. Someone with an E0 8400/8500 could do it no problem. A CPU that could do 550 x 8 and some nice D9's would be some real fun on this board

    Everest @ 550 FSB, 660 MHz CL 5. Not bad bandwidth and latency for a P45


    Max ram clock so far - 665.8 MHz (TeamXtreem 8500's at 2.3v real)
    Last edited by CryptiK; 09-27-2008 at 06:09 AM.
    Ci7 990X::Rampage III Extreme::12GB Corsair Dominator 1866C7GT::2 x EVGA SC Titans in SLI::Corsair AX1200::TJ07::Watercooled
    Ci7 920 3849B018::Rampage II Extreme::6GB GSKILL Trident 2000C9 BBSE::EVGA GTX580::Antec Signature SG850::TJ09::Aircooled w/TRUE 120X

  7. #1132
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Georgia USA
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by ATLNY View Post
    ok
    I will try that as soon as I got my board back
    I RMA it today due to the NB temp too high
    I got the temp down to 55 C(idle) from 79 C
    this is not a cheap board and I should be happy with it
    I can't wait to try those setting

    thanks
    I just got my board back from new egg

    it seems that Asus is moding these board due to the NB temp too high
    they have put two thick paper washers under the NB heatsink
    and gave it a thick layer of coating (pc101) spray
    the result is a much lower NB temp Idle 39, load 51

    I will try to hit 4.0 now
    I wil let you know
    Rich Martin

    Spec:
    Q9650 @ 4050 MHz @ 1.29v
    Maximus II , P45 chipset
    GeForce GTX 260
    Corsair XMS2 DHX DDR2PC6400 (4 GB)
    (2) Seagate 320 RAID 0, (2) 1TB SATA II
    PS. Corsair VX550W
    Cooling Master ATCS 840
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64
    Cooling: Swiftech H20-220 Apex Ultra

  8. #1133
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Quote Originally Posted by The Nemesis View Post
    QX9650 was tried but 500FSB was not possible. It topped out @498 bootable from bios with both a Q9450 & QX9650. 495FSB was benchmark stable but 475FSB has proven prime stable for me. This is not the board to pair with a QX9650. The unlocked multiplier deserves a fast performing chipset i.e. x38 or x48. This board however is a perfect match for Q9X50's as it can reach 475+ FSB stable so you should be able to hit 4GHz stable with a Q9550 or greater. Performance wise though, its no match for the other chipsets.
    Any suggestions? P5E Deluxe maybe?
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  9. #1134
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,941
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Anyone running this board with either a QX9650 or Q9650 that has gotten to 500FSB or 450x10? I am thinking about replacing my Blitz with this board, but if I am not going to get anything higher than my 4Ghz then I will just wait or try a different board. I did a search for these two chips and did not see anything higher than 4Ghz with this board.

    Thanks,

    Utnorris
    I personally would grab a X48 board I have seen alot higher clocks with that board than the MIIF.
    It is far superior than this platform. Zucker2K has shown some impressive clocks using the board.
    If your looking for alot of bling and mediocre performance than P45 is your answer, otherwise I would look at Rampage X48
    I have one here I was going to test to prove my therory but sadly it arrived DOA so it will have to wait alittle longer

  10. #1135
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Grnfinger View Post
    I personally would grab a X48 board I have seen alot higher clocks with that board than the MIIF.

    I would look at Rampage X48. I have one here I was going to test to prove my therory but sadly it arrived DOA so it will have to wait alittle longer
    thats exactly along the same lines that ive been thinking, however id really like to get away from Asus.

  11. #1136
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Acreageville, Alberta
    Posts
    1,411
    Quote Originally Posted by ThugsRook View Post
    thats exactly along the same lines that ive been thinking, however id really like to get away from Asus.

    I sadly agree. Everytime I go to asus I have high hopes that get trashed. I guess I can not really complain. I have my E8400 @ 4.5Ghz stable, but it is knowing that you are not getting max performance that bugs me.

  12. #1137
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Well that's your fault then for picking a P45 based mobo... not Asus' fault... why would someone expect a chipset that retails lower than X48, be superior to the Intel flagship chipset... I get far better clocks with P45 then I did with P35 or X38... never got 500FSB there out of a quad...nor 600FSB with a duallie with an out of the box mobo and respectable voltages...

    X38 and 48 are better ram performers clock for clock, but do you notice that in daily usage : nope... for benching : yes
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 09-27-2008 at 08:55 AM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  13. #1138
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Well that's your fault then for picking a P45 based mobo... not Asus' fault.
    P45 is not Asus' fault. half baked motherboards and lame bios updates are.

    Ket is doing more for these boards by himself then Asus has since their release. that should tell you something right there.

    maybe Asus should release more versions of the P45, they dont have enough yet

  14. #1139
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,941
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Well that's your fault then for picking a P45 based mobo... not Asus' fault... why would someone expect a chipset that retails lower than X48, be superior to the Intel flagship chipset... I get far better clocks with P45 then I did with P35 or X38... never got 500FSB there out of a quad...nor 600FSB with a duallie with an out of the box mobo and respectable voltages...

    X38 and 48 are better ram performers clock for clock, but do you notice that in daily usage : nope... for benching : yes
    I'm running both platforms currently, can I notice / feel a difference.....HELL YES.
    There is a huge difference in feel, loading times and overall performance.
    I dont need a benchmark to show me this.
    I am somewhat happy with my purchase I got exactly what I wanted a 4.0GHz quad core 24/7 machine. What I am not happy with is a board in half the price out performing the ROG line, why did I pay 300 bucks for my board when a sub 200 board would probably perform on par? I dont think the pretty red heatsink are worth 150 bucks

  15. #1140
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    I have respect for Ket's work but on my boards they do almost nothing... I get just a tad better ram performance but really nothing earthshattering at all. Better clocks not here... ( I have 2 Dlx and 2 E boards...5 45Nm CPU's to work with) But imagine Ket having to do this for all P45 builds of Asus... will be a lot slower then...Asus is not like DFI or other brands, they put out a lot of mobo's , maybe too much but they want to sell as much as possible... Secondly Ket works with the code the engineers put in the bios, he just makes a nice mix out of it... (simplistically put, he's a very bright guy no doubt) and really you don't seem to be aware how many bios updates ( alphas and betas some of us have gone through on these boards to make them work better... Even DFI boards that come to the market months later then the competition still need updates to ensure compatability...

    Some people never seem to be aware how much different hardware there is around and that Ocing is still not guarantueed... because ya neighbour can do it, doesn't mean you ca do it with exactly the same hardware... is it purely the mobo ? is it the bios ? is it the modded bios ? you tell me...

    I didn't noticed anything different coming from P35 or X38 in daily usage... maybe I swap hardware to often (harddrives and co) but this board is way more stable then my Formula SE ever was... in benches I could feel the differences... daily sorry nope... I just love new toys but comign from a rock stable and good performing P35 (with one Gfx card) X38, X48 and P45 are not really a worthwhile step up for normal clocks (400-500FSB range, depending on CPU)

    For the difference between the Dlx and the MFII think the PCB layout is pretty the same, you just pay extra for all the gimmicks and a few tweaks in the bios... between the E and Dlx boards there's a whole lot more clocking potential in the Dlx...
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 09-27-2008 at 10:49 AM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  16. #1141
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Ok,
    Just curious at what sub $200 board you are referring to that is an x48. I looked, but the closest I could find was ECS, which I wouldn't consider, or the P5E Deluxe at $220. Maybe I am just misunderstanding what you are saying, please explain a little more.
    Thank you,

    Utnorris
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  17. #1142
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    89
    I got exactly what I wanted a 4.0GHz quad core 24/7 machine Love it
    Asus Rampage III Extreme i7 970@ 4.26
    g-skill ripjaw 12g kit@1855 2 gtx580 sli
    275T samsung lcd, pci Express X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty

  18. #1143
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,941
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    I have respect for Ket's work but on my boards they do almost nothing... I get just a tad better ram performance but really nothing earthshattering at all. Better clocks not here... ( I have 2 Dlx and 2 E boards...5 45Nm CPU's to work with) But imagine Ket having to do this for all P45 builds of Asus... will be a lot slower then...Asus is not like DFI or other brands, they put out a lot of mobo's , maybe too much but they want to sell as much as possible... Secondly Ket works with the code the engineers put in the bios, he just makes a nice mix out of it... (simplistically put, he's a very bright guy no doubt) and really you don't seem to be aware how many bios updates ( alphas and betas some of us have gone through on these boards to make them work better... Even DFI boards that come to the market months later then the competition still need updates to ensure compatability...

    Some people never seem to be aware how much different hardware there is around and that Ocing is still not guarantueed... because ya neighbour can do it, doesn't mean you ca do it with exactly the same hardware... is it purely the mobo ? is it the bios ? is it the modded bios ? you tell me...

    I didn't noticed anything different coming from P35 or X38 in daily usage... maybe I swap hardware to often (harddrives and co) but this board is way more stable then my Formula SE ever was... in benches I could feel the differences... daily sorry nope... I just love new toys but comign from a rock stable and good performing P35 (with one Gfx card) X38, X48 and P45 are not really a worthwhile step up for normal clocks (400-500FSB range, depending on CPU)

    For the difference between the Dlx and the MFII think the PCB layout is pretty the same, you just pay extra for all the gimmicks and a few tweaks in the bios... between the E and Dlx boards there's a whole lot more clocking potential in the Dlx...
    I agree with you on Kets bios mods, stellar work but it does nothing for my setup. I was hoping for better bandwidth but it did not happen

  19. #1144
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pacific NW usa
    Posts
    2,764
    could someone please help me w/ overclock. i cant seem to get anything over 9x430 w/ my new e8400eo.i got this a week ago maximusII /E8400eo/g.skill pc-8800 pi 2x2g/true 120/radeon3650/wd320g /antec550w. for the life of me i cant get any kind of decent clocks. at this point i would be happy with 9x450 4050/mem@1081. please please some help
    _________________________________________________
    ............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    MY HEATWARE 76-0-0

  20. #1145
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,941
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    could someone please help me w/ overclock. i cant seem to get anything over 9x430 w/ my new e8400eo.i got this a week ago maximusII /E8400eo/g.skill pc-8800 pi 2x2g/true 120/radeon3650/wd320g /antec550w. for the life of me i cant get any kind of decent clocks. at this point i would be happy with 9x450 4050/mem@1081. please please some help
    post your current bios setup thats stable and suggestions can be made from there

  21. #1146
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pacific NW usa
    Posts
    2,764
    _________________________________________________
    ............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    MY HEATWARE 76-0-0

  22. #1147
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pacific NW usa
    Posts
    2,764
    as you can see this is not stable, if i have it 430x9 stable. update i think i found a sweet spot i changed the Vcore to 1.385 in bios and prime going on 20 minutes now . i think when i went from the p5q -d to this iwas trying cpuvtt@1.26 today when i tried 1.16 it seems to have done the trick
    Last edited by radaja; 09-27-2008 at 12:54 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    ............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    MY HEATWARE 76-0-0

  23. #1148
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mansfield TX
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Any suggestions? P5E Deluxe maybe?
    If your just trying to save $70 then the P5E is fine. I personally would grab the Rampage. It's one of the fastest performing boards available and plays nice with 45nm Quads. Since we live in the same metroplex area however, you could run to Fry's. The now carry the full line of Asus P45 chipset motherboards. You could try one out and if not satisfied with the memory performance return it. The Maximus II is only $269.99 so with tax it would only cost about $10 more than ordering from the egg. I've been thinking about the P5Q Deluxe to refit my workstation. It is far time to retire my P5W DH and E6600 collection. On the other hand, with I7 so close is it really worth it to invest any further on this architecture?
    Praetor
    » Intel i7 2600K 3103B306 » Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z » Asus GTX 470's TRi-SLI » Corsair Dominator GT CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Corsair 800D
    » Cooling : Swiftec Apogee XT » Swiftec MCP350-DDC1 w/XSPC Dual DDC Bay Reservoir » Swiftech MCR320-QP w/Scythe SlipStreams 110CFM

    The Yamato
    » Intel i7 920 3849B028 or i7 980X » Asus Rampage III Extreme Black Edition » Asus HD6970's QuadFireX or Asus GTX 570's 4way SLI » 6GB Corsair Dominator GT TR3X6G1866C7GTF » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Microcool Banchetto 101
    » Cooling : Dragon F1 Extreme Edition(LN2) » Custom SS by RunMc »


  24. #1149
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Quote Originally Posted by The Nemesis View Post
    If your just trying to save $70 then the P5E is fine. I personally would grab the Rampage. It's one of the fastest performing boards available and plays nice with 45nm Quads. Since we live in the same metroplex area however, you could run to Fry's. The now carry the full line of Asus P45 chipset motherboards. You could try one out and if not satisfied with the memory performance return it. The Maximus II is only $269.99 so with tax it would only cost about $10 more than ordering from the egg. I've been thinking about the P5Q Deluxe to refit my workstation. It is far time to retire my P5W DH and E6600 collection. On the other hand, with I7 so close is it really worth it to invest any further on this architecture?
    It's funny you mention the Maximus II at Frys. I was just there and noticed they had one on hand. I went by Microcenter and they have the Maximus Formula still, clearanced out and only at, get this, ONLY $339.99. Someone is smoking some serious crack over there. Anyway, I was thinking about the Rampage, it would be an easy swap out with my Blitz.

    Thanks,
    Utnorris
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  25. #1150
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mansfield TX
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    It's funny you mention the Maximus II at Frys. I was just there and noticed they had one on hand. I went by Microcenter and they have the Maximus Formula still, clearance out and only at, get this, ONLY $339.99. Someone is smoking some serious crack over there. Anyway, I was thinking about the Rampage, it would be an easy swap out with my Blitz.

    Thanks,
    Utnorris
    The Arlington store was loaded with P5Q Deluxes Maximus II & other P5Q boards. Microcenter is weird with their pricing although I picked up the Biostar TPower I45 from there for $169.99 & 20 MIR. I also grabbed the Apogee GTZ from there too. I got lucky with my Maximus formula it was $142 open box clearance @ Fry's.
    Praetor
    » Intel i7 2600K 3103B306 » Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z » Asus GTX 470's TRi-SLI » Corsair Dominator GT CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Corsair 800D
    » Cooling : Swiftec Apogee XT » Swiftec MCP350-DDC1 w/XSPC Dual DDC Bay Reservoir » Swiftech MCR320-QP w/Scythe SlipStreams 110CFM

    The Yamato
    » Intel i7 920 3849B028 or i7 980X » Asus Rampage III Extreme Black Edition » Asus HD6970's QuadFireX or Asus GTX 570's 4way SLI » 6GB Corsair Dominator GT TR3X6G1866C7GTF » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Microcool Banchetto 101
    » Cooling : Dragon F1 Extreme Edition(LN2) » Custom SS by RunMc »


Page 46 of 179 FirstFirst ... 36434445464748495696146 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •