Quote Originally Posted by IanY View Post
Gabe, I cannot tell you what to do, but if I were you, if RCHN were my company, I wouldn't hand out blocks to anybody anywhere for any reason. You should control info about your own product and ensure the integrity of information. Your product's capabilities should speak for itself, not some third party on some hobbyist forum. Look at the resulting nonsense. Just a kind suggestion, with full respect to you.
Hmm i like the idea of independent testing. But i also think there is something to this.
Biggest problem is people not believing the manufactors numbers and hey, is that really weird when u see all the bull out there?
1 reason we trust people like Martin is because they dont make anything of theire testing. There is no point in altering the numbers for them.
Another and just as important reason (atleast for me) is that there is no secrecy, we know all of Martins equipment, and we know how he tests.
So we know its done properly, he didnt just fire up the computer and looked at the cpu temp readings.

U do alot of testing anyways. i dont know, maybe its more of a hassle than i think but maybe with the realease of new stuff u could post ur own review of the product? With detailed info about testing equipment and stuff.
Heck, maybe u could even get tips on how to improve the testing done too?
(dont get me wrong im not questioning ut skill, just think that 2 brains is better than 1 and that we always learn something new)

Anyways, just an idea. I have no clue about how feasible it really is.