MMM
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 154

Thread: ASUS P6T Series Features New Intel X58 Chipset

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    238
    Anything about the release date and the prise? I so hope, that it' would be early september ...

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    171
    I'm curious about the DIMM slots. Shouldn't they have 3 colors now - one for each of the 3 channels?

    CPU: Intel i7 3770k. . . . . . . .Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus
    Mobo: ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe . . . . RAM: 4x4GiB GSkill Rampage 2133MHz 1.65V
    Video: Sapphire Radeon 7970 . . . Drives: Intel 520 SSDs
    Power: Seasonic Platinum 860W. . .Case: Rosewill Thor v2

  3. #28
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Andypro1,
    There's no standard for slot coloring so not really. Some makers choose color per channel, some assign same color for those slots that you use for DC.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Andypro1 View Post
    I'm curious about the DIMM slots. Shouldn't they have 3 colors now - one for each of the 3 channels?
    Why? You'd want to populate all three channels anyway so they're just differentiated with two colors to avoid populating two channels with 2+1 DIMM.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Andypro1 View Post
    I'm curious about the DIMM slots. Shouldn't they have 3 colors now - one for each of the 3 channels?
    No? You want to fill 3 at a time. Like all the black.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  6. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
    Also this whole SAS controller thing is a waste. I'll stick with a hardware raid card thanks.
    I think it's a great addition. I'm planning to get 2 15K Savvio's (one for OS, one for apps), a load of RAM, and disable the page file. Gets rid of the regret of not going all out with RAID and buying a good hardware controller (too much $$$ and after careful thought, too little reward for my needs).

    PS. the SAS controller isn't a RAID controller. That would cost a few hundred extra bucks if it was even possible (and I don't think they have software RAID for SCSI/SAS). They just added it so people can use SAS drives, which again I think is an awesome addition.
    Last edited by Baron_Davis; 08-10-2008 at 12:08 PM.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    SAS support is nice - but then again SAS HDDs are now almost useless for desktops simply due to the existence of SSDs.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  8. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    SAS support is nice - but then again SAS HDDs are now almost useless for desktops simply due to the existence of SSDs.
    SAS drives are very fast, and their write speeds are faster than a lot of SSD drives. I think people now focus on synthetic benchmarks way too much, and they don't realize that SSD's aren't as great as they seem (in their current state) when it comes to real applications.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    SAS drives are very fast, and their write speeds are faster than a lot of SSD drives. I think people now focus on synthetic benchmarks way too much, and they don't realize that SSD's aren't as great as they seem (in their current state) when it comes to real applications.
    For an OS drive, for me at least, access speeds ('snappy feel') is more important than throughput, and the only thing that beats flash for low latency is a RAM-drive, which isn't even close in terms of ease of use, capacity, price, and so on.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Baron_Davis,
    As far as I understand, write speed is the least important factor for a storage solution's performance in consumer applications.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  11. #36
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    16 phase CPU PWM... Cra-aaazy I tell you!


    Btw, why does X58 have so friggin HUGE die?
    the die is actually smaller then 2 Merom stuck together to form a MCM quad core Kentsfield. The socket and package are larger due to all the extra pins needed to run 2 QPI lanes and 3 memory channels.

    EDIT: oh you ment Tylersburg. Well it needs to carry IO for 2 QPI lanes, the logic for PCI control and all the logic required to control the power and clocks for all the seperate parts of 2 Nehalem die.
    Last edited by Blauhung; 08-10-2008 at 01:51 PM.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  12. #37
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Blauhung View Post
    the die is actually smaller then 2 Merom stuck together to form a MCM quad core Kentsfield. The socket and package are larger due to all the extra pins needed to run 2 QPI lanes and 3 memory channels.
    I think he meant the chipset, compared to its function. Given that the memory controller is gone one might not expect it to be big.

  13. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Baron_Davis,
    As far as I understand, write speed is the least important factor for a storage solution's performance in consumer applications.
    Well, whenever you install a program or update your drivers, your write speed is a big factor. I'm no performance expert, but I'd like for someone to show me some real life benchmarks where SSD's are destroying or even beating 15K RPM SAS drives (or even Velociraptors). You can get a 15K Savvio 36GB drive for around 300 just for reference.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,478
    Say hello to my next mobo!

    I (like most here) can't wait to see what Nehalem will bring to the table, it's great to see some pics of Tylersburg mobo's surfacing.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Am I correct that X58 is made on 65nm?
    How about X38?

    Baron_Davis,
    Indeed, writes are "only" needed in select instances in normal consumer use. Huge majority of storage accesses are reads... Not even sequential, but random reads. Then ofcourse, if one does things heavily involving the storage - like video editing 'n' such - it's a different matter.
    Last edited by largon; 08-10-2008 at 02:27 PM.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    X38 and X48 (basically same chip) are made on 90 nm, as is P35. P45 is made on 65 nm. and so will X58.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  17. #42
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Must be some serious logic in there...
    X58's approx. transistor count?
    You were not supposed to see this.

  18. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    22
    the board looks a bit bigger hope it will be able to fit on current cases

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,160
    Quote Originally Posted by ultimate11 View Post
    the board looks a bit bigger hope it will be able to fit on current cases
    its not bigger


  20. #45
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    I'm also worried about the size and TDP of the X58. Looks too big for what it's supposed to be.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,565
    I still think its dumb they no longer have the IHS, thats was a Good addition.
    EVGA X58 Classified
    Intel i7 965
    Corsair Dominator 1600mhz 3x2gb
    Nvidia GTX 295

  22. #47
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    while I don't think I should give out actual die sizes, I can probably say that Tylersburg is smaller then both Bearlake (G35/P35) and Seaburg (X5400) are larger then Tylersburg, with Eaglelake (G45/P45) being smaller then Tylersburg by about the same ammount that Bearlake and Seaburg are larger. While I don't know much about what is taking up all the space that should have been freed up by no longer having integrated graphics on die like the P35/P45 have, I do know that since Tylersburg is a server chipset, there is a lot of stuff devoted to handling all the cross traffic that will be going through the QPI links. Just keep in mind that the X58 platform is a server chip that was fit into the enthusiast space because it has the PCIe lanes and overclocking functionality we want.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  23. #48
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    when 775 x58?

    up to 24GB ram support?
    Last edited by NapalmV5; 08-10-2008 at 05:54 PM.

  24. #49
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    16 phase CPU PWM... Cra-aaazy I tell you!
    ASUS already uses 16 phase VRM on many of their higher end boards (including the P45 based P5Q Deluxe and above).
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I have a feeling that in 5 years. WD, Seagate etc will be some unknown names.
    (Posted by Shintai, 08-18-2008)

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    1,055
    Will there be P55? Haven't really stayed on top of motherboard releases.

    I wonder what cooling they will put on the "northbridge." It seems like anything of significant size would block the first PCI-E slot, otherwise the layout looks good.

    i5 750 @ 3.2 Ghz, stock volts on stock cooling
    4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 7-7-7-21
    Gigabyte P55-DS2
    EVGA GTX260 192shader

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •