Page 32 of 189 FirstFirst ... 22293031323334354282132 ... LastLast
Results 776 to 800 of 4708

Thread: X48 Rampage Formula Preview.

  1. #776
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    What RAM do you have?
    I'm using the RAM in my sig. The 1066MHz G.Skills

    Some of your settings are off. To get a higher TREF, you'll have to revert to bios 0308. 0219 also has a higher TREF. Under hardware, what voltages is your bios reporting?
    So I should downgrade the BIOS to 0308 for the tREF. No problem.

    Here's the voltages as reported by BIOS in the Hardware Monitor section:

    CPU Voltage = 1.392V
    CPU PLL Voltage = 1.568V
    FSB Termination Voltage = 1.504V
    DRAM Voltage = 2.144V
    North Bridge Voltage = 1.648V
    South Bridge Voltage = 1.136V
    SB 1.5V Voltage = 1.648V
    DRAM Controller Voltage REF = 1.072V
    3.3V Voltage = 3.296V
    5V Voltage = 5.040V
    12V Voltage = 12.208V


    I'll get back with any changes after I downgrade my BIOS.

    THANK YOU for all of your help!! I can't wait until I have this thing stable and can stop bothering you guys.

    EDIT: Updated Voltages to what I have set up now.

    EDIT (2): So far, with 0308 BIOS, the updated voltages and mem timings fixed as instructed by Zucker2K, I've gone the longest on Prime95 so far. I've gone 20 minutes with no errors. I'm going to let it run overnight and hopefully I can sleep through the anxiety of wanting to check how it's doing every 20-30 minutes

    I'll report how it does in the morning.

    EDIT (3): Well, it BSODed about an hour into the Prime95 run. I can't complain about that, it's MUCH better than anything I've run before. I'm going to try bumping that Vtt up to the full 1.520 you suggested, Zucker2K. Hopefully that will be what I need.

    EDIT (4): With Vtt at 1.520V, I BSODed in about 10-15 minutes. Not sure where I can tweak this to get that full stability.
    Last edited by hartigan; 07-14-2008 at 03:29 AM.
    SilverStone OP1000 1000W PSU • Asus Rampage Formula - 0308 • Intel Xeon X3350 • 8 GB G.Skill F2-8500CL5D-4GBPK

    WD 500GB x2 (RAID1) • WD 150GB Raptor x3 ( RAID0) • WD 74GB Raptor • WD 320GB

    eVga 8800GTX • X-Fi Elite Pro

  2. #777
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    235
    Hey guys, I am considering getting this MB, but don't know which RAM to get for it.

    Here are some options please tell me which you think will be better

    1 - OCZ Reapers 4GB kit PC8500 (OCZ2RPR10664GK)

    2 - Corsair PC8500 4GB kit (TWIN2X4096-8500C5DF)

    3 - Team Group PC8500 4GB kit (TXDD4096M1066HC5DC-D)

    I'm in Australia and these are the best options at the place I'm buying from. Which would be the best compatible kit from these? Or would I be better off getting PC6400 RAM and overclocking it?
    Last edited by Ice009; 07-14-2008 at 05:15 AM.

  3. #778
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    36
    I've got a question about this board since i'm considering this to replace my P5K-E/Wifi-AP which has the Sata bug apperantly.

    Does this board have any problem's with WD's Velociraptor and Samsung's F1 1TB drives, since my Raptor reinitializes every once in a while making the system freeze for a few seconds but it passes WD's diag.

    I plan to run this board with my Q6600 that does 3,2 at default voltage and 400FSB which is what i'm also looking for in this board, higher is ofcourse better but lower is not

    Btw the P5K-E is going to be replaced also because i want propper crossfire support.

    Thanks for any input guys!

  4. #779
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    55
    I'm getting NOWHERE with my Rampage Formula/QX9650. I can up the multi to 10 and it works fine, but even increasing the bus 7 MHz to 340 Vista will not load. I've tried upping voltages to insane levels just to see if it helped and it doesn't seem to. I had this same CPU and memory at 420 x 10 on my Maximus Formula 12 hours + prime stable.

    Since it will generally POST I'm wondering if maybe I have a Vista issue. I swapped from the Maximus without a re-install and recently went from an 8800GTX to HD4870. Removed the nvidia drivers, did driver cleaner, etc using the 8.6 hotfix catalyst drivers. Since the video card swap there are some issues. Sometimes it won't go into standby (S3) as set in the power properties. Manually putting it into standby works fine. Sometimes it will crash coming out of standby. I guess I'll hang on until the official 8.7 catalysts come out and do a re-install. In the meantime running at 3.33 GHz. Hopefully reinstalling Vista will get my OC back.

    On a side note the Maximus was RMA to Asus and they have return shipped. It'll be interesting to see what shows up. It seems like the X48 should be > X38, so there must be some other issue with the OC.
    Asus P6T Deluxe V2
    i7 920 @ 3.8 GHZ (200 BCLK x 19)
    TRUE 1366 push/pull
    6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
    Sapphire 4870X2
    1x WD Cavier Black 1TB SATA
    1x WD 500GB SATA
    Auzentech X-Fi Prelude
    Samsung SH-S202G DVD-R/W
    Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
    Vista Home Premium X64

  5. #780
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Clump View Post
    I'm getting NOWHERE with my Rampage Formula/QX9650. I can up the multi to 10 and it works fine, but even increasing the bus 7 MHz to 340 Vista will not load. I've tried upping voltages to insane levels just to see if it helped and it doesn't seem to. I had this same CPU and memory at 420 x 10 on my Maximus Formula 12 hours + prime stable.

    Since it will generally POST I'm wondering if maybe I have a Vista issue. I swapped from the Maximus without a re-install and recently went from an 8800GTX to HD4870. Removed the nvidia drivers, did driver cleaner, etc using the 8.6 hotfix catalyst drivers. Since the video card swap there are some issues. Sometimes it won't go into standby (S3) as set in the power properties. Manually putting it into standby works fine. Sometimes it will crash coming out of standby. I guess I'll hang on until the official 8.7 catalysts come out and do a re-install. In the meantime running at 3.33 GHz. Hopefully reinstalling Vista will get my OC back.

    On a side note the Maximus was RMA to Asus and they have return shipped. It'll be interesting to see what shows up. It seems like the X48 should be > X38, so there must be some other issue with the OC.
    What clocks are aiming for? Please post your settings.

  6. #781
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    What clocks are aiming for? Please post your settings.
    I'd like to get the same OC I had on the Maximus, 420x10. At this point I'll settle for being able to up the bus speed at all.

    I've tried leaving everything on auto, manually setting voltages and timings and combinations. I tried Hartigan's settings and upped all of the voltages to the first setting where they go yellow. The result is the same - crash on Vista load. Keep in mind that all of this is with a bus speed of 340 and a 9x multi. That's what leads me to thinking it's a Vista issue.
    Asus P6T Deluxe V2
    i7 920 @ 3.8 GHZ (200 BCLK x 19)
    TRUE 1366 push/pull
    6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
    Sapphire 4870X2
    1x WD Cavier Black 1TB SATA
    1x WD 500GB SATA
    Auzentech X-Fi Prelude
    Samsung SH-S202G DVD-R/W
    Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
    Vista Home Premium X64

  7. #782
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Clump View Post
    I'd like to get the same OC I had on the Maximus, 420x10. At this point I'll settle for being able to up the bus speed at all.

    I've tried leaving everything on auto, manually setting voltages and timings and combinations. I tried Hartigan's settings and upped all of the voltages to the first setting where they go yellow. The result is the same - crash on Vista load. Keep in mind that all of this is with a bus speed of 340 and a 9x multi. That's what leads me to thinking it's a Vista issue.
    What are your current settings?

  8. #783
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    What are your current settings?
    Currently everything on Auto, except:
    CPU Multi - 10.0
    V DIMM - 2.10

    Running OK with these settings. Going back to 9.0 multi and raising FSB from 333 stock to 340 = crash loading Vista at CPU voltage from auto to 1.7.

    It's BIOS 0406 Beta BTW.
    Asus P6T Deluxe V2
    i7 920 @ 3.8 GHZ (200 BCLK x 19)
    TRUE 1366 push/pull
    6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
    Sapphire 4870X2
    1x WD Cavier Black 1TB SATA
    1x WD 500GB SATA
    Auzentech X-Fi Prelude
    Samsung SH-S202G DVD-R/W
    Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
    Vista Home Premium X64

  9. #784
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Slappyville - North Bay,CA
    Posts
    833
    Quote Originally Posted by Ice009 View Post
    Hey guys, I am considering getting this MB, but don't know which RAM to get for it.

    Here are some options please tell me which you think will be better

    1 - OCZ Reapers 4GB kit PC8500 (OCZ2RPR10664GK)

    2 - Corsair PC8500 4GB kit (TWIN2X4096-8500C5DF)

    3 - Team Group PC8500 4GB kit (TXDD4096M1066HC5DC-D)

    I'm in Australia and these are the best options at the place I'm buying from. Which would be the best compatible kit from these? Or would I be better off getting PC6400 RAM and overclocking it?
    everyone who has the G.Skills is very happy with them & the board is happy also .. soo there have been problems with the OCZ & corsair but then agin some are happy with them but I don't know which ones of each will work BuT the G.Skills do work quite well & those being the DDR2-1000 & DDR2-1066 2x2 gb's alot of us are running 8 gb's of these
    PM me if u want the part #'s
    the problem is not the board per say but the Intel X48 chipset email all the above Memory MFG's & ask about compatabilty of their memory with the Intel X48 chipset any good MFG'er will advise what will work of their's & what will not .... if they can;t that tells you something
    hope this helps
    this is a great board

  10. #785
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Clump View Post
    Currently everything on Auto, except:
    CPU Multi - 10.0
    V DIMM - 2.10

    Running OK with these settings. Going back to 9.0 multi and raising FSB from 333 stock to 340 = crash loading Vista at CPU voltage from auto to 1.7.

    It's BIOS 0406 Beta BTW.
    Okay, try this for starters:

    Extreme Tweaker
    Ai Overclock Tuner : Manual
    OC From CPU Level Up : AUTO
    CPU Ratio Control : Manual
    - Ratio CMOS Setting : 10
    FSB Frequency : 400
    FSB Strap to North Bridge : 400
    PCI-E Frequency: 112
    DRAM Frequency: DDR2- 1066
    DRAM Command Rate : 2T
    DRAM CMD Skew on Channel A: AUTO
    DRAM CMD Skew on Channel B: AUTO
    DRAM CLK Skew on Channel A: 300
    DRAM CLK Skew on Channel B: 300
    DRAM Timing Control: AUTO (This is same as):

    Primary: 5-5-5-15-3-AUTO (for 52)-6-3

    Secondary: 8-3-5-4-6-4-6

    Tertiary: 14-5-1-6-6

    DRAM Static Read Control: Disabled
    Ai Clock Twister : Moderate/Strong
    Transaction Booster : Manual
    CPL: 6

    CPU Voltage :
    CPU PLL Voltage : 1.50 - 1.56
    North Bridge Voltage : 1.49v - 1.55v
    DRAM Voltage : 2.1ov
    FSB Termination Voltage : 1.300 - 1.36v
    South Bridge Voltage : 1.100v
    Loadline Calibration : Disabled
    CPU GTL Reference : AUTO
    North Bridge GTL Reference : x67
    DDR2 Channel A REF Voltage :
    DDR2 Channel B REF Voltage :
    DDR2 Controller REF Voltage :
    SB 1.5V Voltage :

    NB LED Selection : NB Volt
    SB LED Selection : SB Volt
    CPU LED Selection : CPU VOlt
    Voltiminder LED :

    CPU Spread Spectrum : Disabled
    PCIE Spread Spectrum : Disabled

    With the Loadline Calibration disabled, if you haven't done the pencil mod, you'll need about .1v to make up the difference in vdrop (note, not vdroop).

    Goodluck,

    Richard.
    Last edited by Zucker2k; 07-14-2008 at 07:20 AM.

  11. #786
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Slappyville - North Bay,CA
    Posts
    833
    Quote Originally Posted by Clump View Post
    I'm getting NOWHERE with my Rampage Formula/QX9650. I can up the multi to 10 and it works fine, but even increasing the bus 7 MHz to 340 Vista will not load. I've tried upping voltages to insane levels just to see if it helped and it doesn't seem to. I had this same CPU and memory at 420 x 10 on my Maximus Formula 12 hours + prime stable.

    Since it will generally POST I'm wondering if maybe I have a Vista issue. I swapped from the Maximus without a re-install and recently went from an 8800GTX to HD4870. Removed the nvidia drivers, did driver cleaner, etc using the 8.6 hotfix catalyst drivers. Since the video card swap there are some issues. Sometimes it won't go into standby (S3) as set in the power properties. Manually putting it into standby works fine. Sometimes it will crash coming out of standby. I guess I'll hang on until the official 8.7 catalysts come out and do a re-install. In the meantime running at 3.33 GHz. Hopefully reinstalling Vista will get my OC back.


    On a side note the Maximus was RMA to Asus and they have return shipped. It'll be interesting to see what shows up. It seems like the X48 should be > X38, so there must be some other issue with the OC.
    look this has worked for me more than once as i had the same problem !
    1st SAVE every thing on the drives !!!!


    I'd would clear the CMOS (switch the CMOS lever on the mobo to off & then remove battery for an hour, replace battery then move switch back & at that point do a fresh install of the Vista ) this has happened to me & i did this this way & Boom every thing worked fine , my Asus P5E MoBo would do the same thing soo i've been down this road a few times ...

  12. #787
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    94
    Hi Guys,

    A quick question, has anybody come across an issue with quads over 500Mhz FSB??

    The reason I ask is, I can boot my Q6600 @ 520 X 7 with 1.61v on the NB. The problem is when I do this I only have 2 core's available. They were prime small fft stable too for just over an hour . As soon as it boots, on the VGA BIOS screen it reads core Count: 2. Is this just a weird bios bug or am I missing something? As soon as I drop back to 490 it's back to all 4 cores.
    Mobo: Rampage Formula
    Processor: Q6600 @ 3.68 Ghz 460 X 8 (1.38V)
    RAM: 4GB Gskill @ 1105 Mhz 5-5-18-3 (2.2V)
    PSU: Enermax Galaxy 1000w
    VGA: 4890 + 250 GTS

  13. #788
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurker246 View Post
    Hi Guys,

    A quick question, has anybody come across an issue with quads over 500Mhz FSB??

    The reason I ask is, I can boot my Q6600 @ 520 X 7 with 1.61v on the NB. The problem is when I do this I only have 2 core's available. They were prime small fft stable too for just over an hour . As soon as it boots, on the VGA BIOS screen it reads core Count: 2. Is this just a weird bios bug or am I missing something? As soon as I drop back to 490 it's back to all 4 cores.
    520 with a quad! No wonder you're having issues. Try more NB volts + more VFSB. Also, you may need more vcore.

  14. #789
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by hartigan View Post
    EDIT (4): With Vtt at 1.520V, I BSODed in about 10-15 minutes. Not sure where I can tweak this to get that full stability.
    Go two steps up on the NB. What temps are you getting on the NB on load? If it fails, back down on VFSB to previous setting, and set both GTLs manually to x67.

  15. #790
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    520 with a quad! No wonder you're having issues. Try more NB volts + more VFSB. Also, you may need more vcore.
    Cheers, I pushed it about as far as possible voltage wise. 1.69 NB, 1.49 vcore. Since I'm still on air I can't push it to the red zone, no matter how many fans I throw at it . The case of the missing cores continues....

    Might be time to take the 'plunge' with a h2o setup (Bad pun intended )

    Here's a pic for those interested in such things;

    Mobo: Rampage Formula
    Processor: Q6600 @ 3.68 Ghz 460 X 8 (1.38V)
    RAM: 4GB Gskill @ 1105 Mhz 5-5-18-3 (2.2V)
    PSU: Enermax Galaxy 1000w
    VGA: 4890 + 250 GTS

  16. #791
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Slappyville - North Bay,CA
    Posts
    833
    lurker is that the newest ver. of realtemp ? as it's showing the wrong cpu try installing it agin & check settings ,test

    turn yer Vista side bar OFF when testing
    Last edited by bigslappy; 07-14-2008 at 11:36 AM.

  17. #792
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by bigslappy View Post
    lurker is that the newest ver. of realtemp ? as it's showing the wrong cpu try installing it agin & check settings ,test

    turn yer Vista side bar OFF when testing
    no probs, it was just a quick screenie, back on 460 X 8 and everything reads fine. It seems to go a bit mental over 500 FSB .
    Mobo: Rampage Formula
    Processor: Q6600 @ 3.68 Ghz 460 X 8 (1.38V)
    RAM: 4GB Gskill @ 1105 Mhz 5-5-18-3 (2.2V)
    PSU: Enermax Galaxy 1000w
    VGA: 4890 + 250 GTS

  18. #793
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Okay, try this for starters:
    <SNIP>
    Goodluck,

    Richard.
    I really hate it when I outsmart myself. I sat down to try the settings that Richard reccomended and when I got to the CPU voltage realized that I wasn't up to 1.6V, I had gone "up" to 1.16V.

    No wonder it wouldn't boot! I'm running at 400x10 now. Did a quick prime 95 run and was stable for 10 minutes or so. Now to some tweaking.

    I don't think I ever made that noobish mistake before.

    Thanks for the help!
    Asus P6T Deluxe V2
    i7 920 @ 3.8 GHZ (200 BCLK x 19)
    TRUE 1366 push/pull
    6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
    Sapphire 4870X2
    1x WD Cavier Black 1TB SATA
    1x WD 500GB SATA
    Auzentech X-Fi Prelude
    Samsung SH-S202G DVD-R/W
    Cooler Master ATCS 840 Case
    Vista Home Premium X64

  19. #794
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by Subsequence View Post
    I've got a question about this board since i'm considering this to replace my P5K-E/Wifi-AP which has the Sata bug apperantly.

    Does this board have any problem's with WD's Velociraptor and Samsung's F1 1TB drives, since my Raptor reinitializes every once in a while making the system freeze for a few seconds but it passes WD's diag.

    I plan to run this board with my Q6600 that does 3,2 at default voltage and 400FSB which is what i'm also looking for in this board, higher is ofcourse better but lower is not

    Btw the P5K-E is going to be replaced also because i want propper crossfire support.

    Thanks for any input guys!


    I run this board with two WD Velociraptors and two of the new WD Black 32Mb 1.0TB drives without problem.

    The Rampage Formula is a very stable platform and should easily overclock your Q6600 to 3.2Ghz

    My E8500 will do 4.2Ghz at 525Mhz FSB on air with the Rampage...

  20. #795
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by bigslappy View Post
    everyone who has the G.Skills is very happy with them & the board is happy also .. soo there have been problems with the OCZ & corsair but then agin some are happy with them but I don't know which ones of each will work BuT the G.Skills do work quite well & those being the DDR2-1000 & DDR2-1066 2x2 gb's alot of us are running 8 gb's of these
    PM me if u want the part #'s
    the problem is not the board per say but the Intel X48 chipset email all the above Memory MFG's & ask about compatabilty of their memory with the Intel X48 chipset any good MFG'er will advise what will work of their's & what will not .... if they can;t that tells you something
    hope this helps
    this is a great board
    I can't get GSkill from the place I'm buying the RAM, also GSkill is a bit scarce here in Australia. Which would you choose out of the ones I've listed?

    I will have to track down the email and send each company an email. So it's the X48 chipset not the RAM that is causing problems? I thought I also read somewhere that the PC8500's don't work too well on X38, X48 and that PC6400 works better?

  21. #796
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Go two steps up on the NB. What temps are you getting on the NB on load? If it fails, back down on VFSB to previous setting, and set both GTLs manually to x67.

    I'm hitting 40*C with the North Bridge at 1.696V under load. So far . . . it's stable with that setting but, I've only run p95 for 10 minutes. I'll update more with that later.

    One thing that is weird (and I don't think I can fix it) is that my Core 0 and Core 1 always report 10 degrees lower than Core 2 and Core 3. It doesn't matter what monitoring prog. I use (CoreTemp, RealTemp, Everest, etc.).

    Also CoreTemp and Everest report 63* and 73* for cores 0,1 and 2,3 respectively. Whereas RealTemp reports them as 53* and 63* From what I've read, that has something to do with the TJ Max settings being different.

    I'm comfortable with the temps reported in RealTemp (53* and 63*) as long as they are the most realistic temps. I just hope that I'm not surpassing the 70* limit mentioned for these processors.

    If anyone has any thoughts on my 10* discrepancy between cores, I'd be curious to hear them. From what I've read, the best diagnosis is a stuck thermistor on the core that has 0 and 1 on it.



    Thank you very much for your help Zucker2K!! I owe you.
    Last edited by hartigan; 07-14-2008 at 07:37 PM.
    SilverStone OP1000 1000W PSU • Asus Rampage Formula - 0308 • Intel Xeon X3350 • 8 GB G.Skill F2-8500CL5D-4GBPK

    WD 500GB x2 (RAID1) • WD 150GB Raptor x3 ( RAID0) • WD 74GB Raptor • WD 320GB

    eVga 8800GTX • X-Fi Elite Pro

  22. #797
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    I cant get anything over 400fsb stable, overall i am disappointed if this is all i can achieve, is there something i am doing wrong? i am on bios 0403

  23. #798
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by hartigan View Post
    I'm hitting 40*C with the North Bridge at 1.696V under load. So far . . . it's stable with that setting but, I've only run p95 for 10 minutes. I'll update more with that later.

    One thing that is weird (and I don't think I can fix it) is that my Core 0 and Core 1 always report 10 degrees lower than Core 2 and Core 3. It doesn't matter what monitoring prog. I use (CoreTemp, RealTemp, Everest, etc.).

    Also CoreTemp and Everest report 63* and 73* for cores 0,1 and 2,3 respectively. Whereas RealTemp reports them as 53* and 63* From what I've read, that has something to do with the TJ Max settings being different.

    I'm comfortable with the temps reported in RealTemp (53* and 63*) as long as they are the most realistic temps. I just hope that I'm not surpassing the 70* limit mentioned for these processors.

    If anyone has any thoughts on my 10* discrepancy between cores, I'd be curious to hear them. From what I've read, the best diagnosis is a stuck thermistor on the core that has 0 and 1 on it.



    Thank you very much for your help Zucker2K!! I owe you.
    No problem mate. Yes the difference between core temp and real temp is the 10C in TJMax. You can change that in settings.ini file which you can locate in the coretemp folder. Make sure this line is exactly like this: TjMaxOffset=-10; The temp difference is common to most 45nm chips. Hope things prove better this time by way of stability.

    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    I cant get anything over 400fsb stable, overall i am disappointed if this is all i can achieve, is there something i am doing wrong? i am on bios 0403
    I apologize for not getting back to you asap. I did try to post settings once only to find the server was under going an upgrade. Anyway, since you're on air, temps are going to be your biggest problem. What FSB/Clocks are you looking at?

  24. #799
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    No problem mate. Yes the difference between core temp and real temp is the 10C in TJMax. You can change that in settings.ini file which you can locate in the coretemp folder. Make sure this line is exactly like this: TjMaxOffset=-10; The temp difference is common to most 45nm chips. Hope things prove better this time by way of stability.



    I apologize for not getting back to you asap. I did try to post settings once only to find the server was under going an upgrade. Anyway, since you're on air, temps are going to be your biggest problem. What FSB/Clocks are you looking at?
    I was hoping for atleast 450fsb, ive tried several different settings posted in this thread, with no luck tho, i would love to get 475, but i can settle for 450, thanks for the help.

  25. #800
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    114
    Can you list the settings you have tried?

Page 32 of 189 FirstFirst ... 22293031323334354282132 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •