Am i right in thinking that if they 'solved' this problem, and sync'd the frames, there would likely be a sizable performance hit? Reminds me of V-sync.
If that's the case, perhaps they just don't want to do this, with SLI and XF scaling already being far from perfect.
TJ07 | Corsair HX1000W | Gigabyte EX58 Extreme | i7 930 @ 4ghz | Ek Supreme | Thermochill PA 120.3 | Laing DDC 12v w/ mod plexi top | 3x2gb Corsair 1600mhz | GTX 680 | Raid 0 300gb Velociraptor x 2 | Razer Lachesis & Lycosa | Win7 HP x64 | fluffy dice.
I hope we mean both the same thing.
I've made ton of graphs visualizing microstuttering, and it appears in cascades. For example the frametime-differences alternate beetween 10 and 60ms.
this stutters
this not
Because the unevenly distributed frames are a result of the too fast cpu
cold is the result of viruses...i don't have a problem understanding this
but this is a way too ot for now
It is clear with different frame times.
The only thing nobody explains - why would the frames be so different all the time in the middle of game? I would understand they differ at the moments of begining of changes of picture like new big object appears on the screen. But! next frame would still have it! If you say that object changed position/size and next frame would require more processing? -Ok. But it supposes to remain on next frame(s)! So time difference should spread over all consequent frames pretty evenly...
So it should not stutter?!
Windows 8.1
Asus M4A87TD EVO + Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3900MHz + HD3850
APUs
Apples and oranges here but, as AMD are practically masters of interconnects would it be out of the question that the graphics group has leveraged some of that knowledge to improve core to core communication? They are the same company after all.
Depends on the game. In something like a racing game where the game world is going by rapidly and the view is changing at a high speed the stuttering can be very noticeable. In an RTS or RPG and most FPS's it won't be that noticeable. And the issue isnt about how long it takes to render the frame on each GPU. It's about the timing of when frames are delivered to each GPU and how long each rendered frame stays on screen.
The problem with it isn't only that you notice it. The other big problem is that the big fps numbers are false. In some scenarios (highly GPU limited) you're getting essentially the same frame rendered twice in a row followed by a long delay then two similiar frames rendered in short time etc. That's why some people find single GPU play "smoother" even though the FPS numbers are lower.
AFR doesn't work well in extremely GPU (frames thrown away, stuttering) or CPU limited situations (no scaling). The sweet spot is somewhere in the middle (my second diagram above).
Last edited by trinibwoy; 06-15-2008 at 09:08 AM.
Sry if this has been posted but,its a 100 pages thread
Does anyone know will accelero S1 fit on 4870 since it fits on 3870?
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
Is the 4870 coming out on june 25th as well?????
And still nothing about the 70. No leaked bench, no nothing.![]()
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
lol there are allready guys that have bought the 4850 and have them in there hands, head over to 3dcenter or hwluxx forum.
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...495808&page=62
He meant the 4870 i think but thanks for the link
Looks like 4850's are in a lot of retailers hands already, some just want an early head start on them sales![]()
Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 06-15-2008 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Ooops wrong quote
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
I dont see how the 4870 would launch at the same time as the 4850, no pics no benchs, i find it hard to believe that it will launch the same time.
well we will se right?
New GPU-Z: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...-Z_v0.2.4.html
Originally Posted by GPU-Z 0.2.4
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
me2, that why i posted it here. I hope someone w/ a HD4800 card will use it and show a validation/ss.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Bookmarks