i also don't think they would have 19x12 as a res on something professional.they would use 1900x1200.
i also don't think they would have 19x12 as a res on something professional.they would use 1900x1200.
or have bad punctuationOriginally Posted by Papu
; then ,
should be :
uhh mr. awesome! in the picture green area page2 and page4 look at the first picture.if faker that stupid why second and fourth page?
I don't understand what you mean.
but they are still fake, a pisspoor job too.
If you want I could fake some then post them on the net.
I'll show the weirdly long page site how it's done
of course my fakes would be researched and based upon specualtion and ATI's own graphs from this year.
Everything would be exact with no poor mismatches, ie; the out of place res on the pic on the fake graph
or the childlike bar graphs. Maybe I would select a better quantative analysis measure
Last edited by Jowy Atreides; 06-11-2008 at 08:53 AM.
loook i'm faker and bad one ok?I'll make first page and second page 1 and 2 got me why second and fourth page?do you believe amd gives to dh these pics in a professional way?
huh, I honestly do not understand what you are trying to convey
you admit to faking them?
give me the layered source and I'll fire up corel and fix them up for ya
it'll give me some lulz
regardsNVIDIA shakened by Radeon HD 4800, lowers prices?
Written by Andreas G 11 June 2008 18:53
It seems that NVIDIA believed that RV770 would only have 480 shader processors, and only be a modest upgrade of the RV670 core. This is suppose to be one of the reasons for the rather high prices of the GeForce GTX cards, that and the ridiculous manufacturing costs. Now that it has been unveiled that RV770 does not have 480 shader processors, but rather 800, it seems NVIDIA might lower the price of the GeForce GTX 260 to make it a bit more appealing in comparison to Radeon HD 4870. We're hearing $399 from more than one source, but we're also hearing that Radeon HD 4870 might not come as cheap as hoped, $349. The GeForce GTX prices are expected to stay put for a long time, but AMD has every possibility to lower the prices of its new graphics cards, if sales are slow, without losing much money.
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7853.html
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
alright forget the page numbers.faker is not stupid he's insane it seems because he used second and fourth.these pics could be non-permitted, copy, reconst. but today i saw two tests, don't know fake or not but these cards will be great i'm sorry just drop it.
Last edited by 22JHP; 06-11-2008 at 09:03 AM.
I hate these nVidia and ATI Quick-Performance overview charts. It's so hard to understand. And I thought my chart was worst.
Detailed to the maxed!
Last edited by clayton; 06-11-2008 at 09:06 AM.
All systems sold. Will be back after Sandy Bridge!
U did a really great job. Ur so good, u even can proof that these real slides are fake. Man, u should be president
Did u ever have a real AMD NDA document? If yes, u´d know that these arent fake but real.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
Great news!
So nvidia is to lower prices... if amd "plays the same game" we may see some serious cards with lower prices than expected. Consumers win.
Q6600@3,8ghz Asus Blitz Formula SE, 2gb gskill hk 4-4-3-5 @950mhz, EVGA 9800GTX+
Thanks!
yeah, ATI uses percentile grading.
They always have as far as I can remember
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Arti.../xf_vs_sli.jpg
http://www.techarp.com/article/AMD/S.../Spider_05.jpg
percentages and not point based like nvidia.
Last edited by Jowy Atreides; 06-11-2008 at 09:09 AM.
@Jowy Atreides: U are comparing the official slides w/ some leaked ones. Thats just BS.
And no, i wont type "you" in the future just cause u would like it.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
let me guess, you do?
Did u ever have a real AMD NDA document? If yes, uŽd know that these arent fake but real.
(everyone around here is under nda apparently)
Well, I'd fire whoever made them for sure.
Or at least i'd give them my old QAFB notes and teach them how to use a computer better than a child with excel charts
Please, type "you" in future. I'm not using textspeak so show the same courtesy
Yes, i did and i do have AMD NDA documents.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
good, I want you to tell your superior that whoever collates the data into visual format should be fired.
If these charts are official then someone is terrible at making charts
Just because they look like rubbish it doesnt mean that its a fake. If the reader, which opend this document has eg a lower resolution it looks like that. And then this slide has been cut and so on.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
i'll bet making charts is not the amd guys only job, so he make the dam charts and got back to what he likes to do
But it does mean someone is terrible at designing presentations
It's called coherence, your posts do not have any.
if this wasn't such a nice forum then there would be 20 pictures of Samuel L Jackson with captions on them in this reply.
This thread has been more entertaining then educational. It seems that for everyone to not know what all the real specs are that it would be hard to know so indefinitly what is fake.
So this is what I have got from this thread.....Nobody knows what the true specs are of the card but tons of ppl know what the specs are not. Seems then you could subtract everything you know the card isnt from all posabilities and then you would have what the card is.....hrm...very interesting.
Speak english m***********!
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
RV770 = 800 SP / 32 or 40 TMU / 16 ROP / 256-bit external/512-bit internal
HD 4850 = 625MHz w/ 512MB GDDR3 @ 2GHz
HD 4870 = 750MHz w/ 512MB GDDR5 @ 3.6GHz
The only thing we don't know exactly is performance. The specs are pretty well known, the only thing I am not sure about is the number of TMUs.
No, it means that someone is just terrible @ presenting them.
And i dont care if there are 20000 pic w/ Samuel L. Jackson, u could even post a pic of ur grandma or the pope.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
k
Bookmarks