Page 79 of 167 FirstFirst ... 29697677787980818289129 ... LastLast
Results 1,951 to 1,975 of 4151

Thread: ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series discussion

  1. #1951
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    299
    Mhmm anyone brainstorm on potential non-PLX communications for the R700 boards then? (trying to get back on topic)

  2. #1952
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    30
    yeah and saying "no problem" everytime someone distributes wrong informations (crossfire of 4850 is better then the gtx in crysis) and 2i understand you that you told us you have cards and will make benchmarks" and some hours later "no benchmarks because its not fair" realy helps to stop whis wrong informations?

  3. #1953
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,715
    I have cards, some photos (now deleted) was posted earlier ... as a proof. But if i publish some results, our magazine, me and my supplier will have many problems. Nobody wants the problems, and i decided no break NDA. Thats all, and some crying babies here have to wait for official launch.

    And AMD guys (reading this thread) ... pay more attention on your samples and dont call me AGAIN! I am not under NDA, and i can do anything i want ... If you will bother me again, i will post everything results i have !!!!!!
    Last edited by OBR; 06-10-2008 at 11:35 AM.

  4. #1954
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    maybe he just not some geeks and likes watching euro 2008??
    LOL

    Always the same with this guy
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  5. #1955
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by spicypixel View Post
    Mhmm anyone brainstorm on potential non-PLX communications for the R700 boards then? (trying to get back on topic)
    As it was explained to me by a user here... Who I believe to be reliable...

    The chip communicates instead right through the memory, giving it around 160 gb/s to work with as opposed to that crappy old PLX chip. Due to this, it allows the GPU's to share memory and work together much more effectively. More like a dual core CPU than the traditional "dual" graphics card.

    This is of course an oversimplification and what have you, but I am not very knowledgeable about the inner workings of cards, just how to OC them

    This could be 100% totally wrong, and it is definitely what I would call hearsay at this point. However, again, IMO this info sounds reasonable.

  6. #1956
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    30
    lol you are a lier, you said you have no NDA

    and your pictures could be from everywhere

    there are many pictures of 4850 in web since a couple of days

  7. #1957
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    I have cards, some photos (now deleted) was posted earlier ... as a proof. But if i publish some results, our magazine, me and my supplier will have many problems. Nobody wants the problems, and i decided no break NDA. Thats all, and some crying babies here have to wait for official launch.

    Right decision.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  8. #1958
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    322
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    I am sure, you can wait for two weeks for launch. I know, my decision is not fair to users here, but it is fair to AMD ...
    I think i kind of strange that it took you so long to realise that?

    Why the post with the big letters "I HAVE THE 4850...and so on.

    You should now people will get anoyd with statements like that or are you totally new in the game? you advertise with how many MB:s you have tested so i guess not!?
    MotherBoard: GigaByte G33M DS2R
    Memory: 2x1 Gb HyperX DDR2-9600, 1200 Mhz
    Cpu: Intel e2160 @ 3,6 Ghz on Air
    Vga: XFX 4870 XXX
    Cooling: Ninja Mini, 2x Ximatek 120mm, 1x Zalman 80mm , Stock Gpu
    Case: Antec Fusion Remote

  9. #1959
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    And AMD guys (reading this thread) ... pay more attention on your samples and dont call me AGAIN! I am not under NDA, and i can do anything i want ... If you will bother me again, i will post everything results i have !!!!!!
    LOL, AMD's hes serious, think of the women and children!

  10. #1960

  11. #1961
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/235024
    second page

    buy it.. bench it.. be the first..

    be first to do the review and stop bothering him ppl..
    he already explained.. the supplier will be in trouble...
    ================================================== ===========

    GIGABYTE GRAPHIC CARDS
    *2 Years Warranty*

    Gigabyte ATI PCI-E X16 Graphic Cards:

    Gigabyte Radeon HD4850 => RM820
    # 512MB 256Bit DDR4 480 Pipeline
    # GPU 650MHz, 1728MHz Memory Clock
    # HDTV, Dual DVI, DX10
    Code: GV-RX485512 2.0
    I call bull for using DDR4, and 650mhz AND 480 SP's, doesn't add up

  12. #1962
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    I have cards, some photos (now deleted) was posted earlier ... as a proof. But if i publish some results, our magazine, me and my supplier will have many problems. Nobody wants the problems, and i decided no break NDA. Thats all, and some crying babies here have to wait for official launch.

    And AMD guys (reading this thread) ... pay more attention on your samples and dont call me AGAIN! I am not under NDA, and i can do anything i want ... If you will bother me again, i will post everything results i have !!!!!!

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!

    Crying babies?
    You, stupid ridicolous idiot, shame on you....How can you call us crying babies?

  13. #1963
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Sly Fox View Post
    As it was explained to me by a user here... Who I believe to be reliable...

    The chip communicates instead right through the memory, giving it around 160 gb/s to work with as opposed to that crappy old PLX chip. Due to this, it allows the GPU's to share memory and work together much more effectively. More like a dual core CPU than the traditional "dual" graphics card.

    This is of course an oversimplification and what have you, but I am not very knowledgeable about the inner workings of cards, just how to OC them

    This could be 100% totally wrong, and it is definitely what I would call hearsay at this point. However, again, IMO this info sounds reasonable.
    That way of 2 chips working together sounds wonderful, just not very realistic in my eyes. We are still not sure if there even is any special trick to the way they cooperate at the moment.
    I think it's a bit more realistic if they made a high speed (faster than 2e gen PCIe 16x) interconnect between the chips and they could do it with some form of bridge chip. This bridge chip then has 1 second gen PCIe 16x connection, for communication with the rest of the system, and 2 high speed connections with the GPUs. These high speed connections can use the extra space for connection 'pads' on the GPU die that are freed up by not having a direct PCIe connection to the GPU. Let's see if I can make some form of drawing of it. Like this:
    Code:
              |RAM| |RAM|                 |RAM| |RAM|
               ||    ||                     ||   ||
    |RAM| =              pb            pb             = |RAM|
              ||GPU 0|| === ||Bridge|| === ||GPU 1||
    |RAM| =                     ||                    = |RAM|
                                || 16x PCIe
    pb= proprietary bridge
    There are of course also some RAM chips on the back of the card.
    This proprietary bridge can be of much higher speed than what PCIe can offer. The connection provided by this will not be enough to do memory sharing but it will make better cooperation between the chips possible, things like inter-frame changes and such. This will make it easier to even make DX10 games scale better than before but it will still be rather driver reliant but to a lesser extent.
    All of this is just some sort of guess of mine though, I have no extensive information on the patents in AMDs possession or knowledge on these kind of things, but I think it's more viable than shared memory in the way you portrayed it
    EDIT: my drawing went to shreds after I posted it, sorry for that.....
    Last edited by Helmore; 06-17-2008 at 07:54 AM.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  14. #1964
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by mascaras View Post
    AMD Radeon HD 4850 and HD 4870 Information




    Edit:

    Source >> http://my.ocworkbench.com/2008/amd/A...0_HD4870-1.htm

    (images are down)

    regards




    images are up again










    Last edited by mascaras; 06-10-2008 at 11:58 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  15. #1965
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    I have cards, some photos (now deleted) was posted earlier ... as a proof. But if i publish some results, our magazine, me and my supplier will have many problems. Nobody wants the problems, and i decided no break NDA. Thats all, and some crying babies here have to wait for official launch.

    And AMD guys (reading this thread) ... pay more attention on your samples and dont call me AGAIN! I am not under NDA, and i can do anything i want ... If you will bother me again, i will post everything results i have !!!!!!


    even without 4850 benchmarks

    you made my day dude

  16. #1966
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,276
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    I have cards, some photos (now deleted) was posted earlier ... as a proof. But if i publish some results, our magazine, me and my supplier will have many problems. Nobody wants the problems, and i decided no break NDA. Thats all, and some crying babies here have to wait for official launch.

    And AMD guys (reading this thread) ... pay more attention on your samples and dont call me AGAIN! I am not under NDA, and i can do anything i want ... If you will bother me again, i will post everything results i have !!!!!!
    this is what i was suspecting, that someone from AMD would read this and try to sue OBR or something.

    OBR-it is prefectly fair to not give the results, you are protecting yourself and whoever gave you the card. dont listen to everyone else who is screaming at you. i am just as upset as i am but that is something that you have to deal with when it comes to the computer industry.
    Quote Originally Posted by NKrader View Post
    just start taking pics of peoples kids the parents will come talk to you shortly. if you have a big creepy van it works faster

  17. #1967
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by ripken204 View Post
    this is what i was suspecting, that someone from AMD would read this and try to sue OBR or something.

    OBR-it is prefectly fair to not give the results, you are protecting yourself and whoever gave you the card. dont listen to everyone else who is screaming at you. i am just as upset as i am but that is something that you have to deal with when it comes to the computer industry.

  18. #1968
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    The fact that there are no bananas for insulting on other languages beyond English doesn’t make this tolerable! Mod should erase all these posts, and serve couple of warns or even bans!! Perkam what are you awaiting?
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  19. #1969
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    12
    *sitting on sofa with popcorns*
    Great publicy tho this forum, a lot of newcomers
    I believe ORB but he was asking for it when he said that would come with the benchies.
    All in all...it's nice to see ati could have here the next killer in performance/price ratio


    regards

  20. #1970
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by mascaras View Post
    images are up again











    seems they got problems with the gddr5 memory... only 1800 mhz clock (slowest bin)?

  21. #1971
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,276
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    The fact that there are no bananas for insulting on other languages beyond English doesn’t make this tolerable! Mod should erase all these posts, and serve couple of warns or even bans!! Perkam what are you awaiting?
    just leave it alone, everyone needs to stop posting these negative comments.
    i am eagerly waiting for the 4870. you guys have been waiting so long for these cards, just wait another 2 weeks and you will know all. you guys must have something better to do than posting rude comments on a forum.
    Quote Originally Posted by NKrader View Post
    just start taking pics of peoples kids the parents will come talk to you shortly. if you have a big creepy van it works faster

  22. #1972
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by ripken204 View Post
    just leave it alone, everyone needs to stop posting these negative comments.
    i am eagerly waiting for the 4870. you guys have been waiting so long for these cards, just wait another 2 weeks and you will know all. you guys must have something better to do than posting rude comments on a forum.

  23. #1973
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    I remember reading somthing quite a while back about the 4870x2 was going to have better comunication between chips thanks to a new generation of PLX chips that will allow full PCIexpress 2.0 vs the PCIexpress 1.0 that is used on the 3870x2 PLX chip. I wish I could remember where I read this but I cant. It did show that they clearly planed on using a PLX chip thow, just a Newer/Better one.

  24. #1974
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    seems they got problems with the gddr5 memory... only 1800 mhz clock (slowest bin)?
    The chip may not need/have-a-use for oodles of bandwidth and 1800 MHz. would suffice. This will reduce price, increase availability, lower power consumption and decrease the amount of defective cards (yields). 1800MHz. will still give you 115 GB/s though.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  25. #1975
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    639
    All you numbnuts (you know who the Fck you all are) need to STFU and have some bloody patience and manners and respect...!!!

    | Intel Core i5 2500K | Asrock P67 Extreme 6 | Gskill Ripjaws 8GB CL7 |

    | Sapphire HD6970 | Creative X-Fi modded | Corsair HX850 | Corsair H60 |



Page 79 of 167 FirstFirst ... 29697677787980818289129 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •