I never said that. You are getting me confused with another member.
I have simply said that Anand's Penryn results were extremely low and not realistic.
and I'm not just guessing at this. I ran the same benchmarks and have seen first hand that his penryn results that he compares Nehalem to are not real world Penryn results.
-edit-
Nehalem will be a great upgrade and I will be one of the first to adopt it, however I take issue with the degree of improvement he is trying to show. It is going to be more like 10%-15%.
Bookmarks