
- Forum
- Hardware
- AMD
- "Core Temp" - A program for accurate K8 temperature monitoring
-
How come for example S&M gives way more accurate temperature readings for me? What I hate the most with CoreTemp is that the temperatures can vary +/-1 in one second. Once it is 60/60, then it is 57/62, then it is 63/59 and so on. How am I supposed to know the temperature? The Coolest, can you honestly call that accurate? What about reading the temp for example 3 times a second, then take average of them and sum it up by the last seconds average and divide by 2? As far as I know, S&M uses similar method, which is far superior to what CoreTemp can offfer.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks