MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 57

Thread: AMD Istanbul chip die picture

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550

    Exclamation AMD Istanbul chip die picture

    Famous Hans De Vries (www.chip-architect.com) has posted picture of AMD's new Istanbul core over the Aceshardware forum (www.aceshardware.com)

    Here's what Hans has to say:

    Quote Originally Posted by Hans De Vries
    "It's probably not a bad idea for AMD to take advantage of their relatively
    small core size. At 45nm it can cram two cores (with 256 kB L1 total) into
    30mm2. A single Nehalem core with 256 kB L2 also occupies ~30 mm2.

    So in terms of IPC/mm2 you get two cores against one core with 2 threads."


    Quote Originally Posted by Hans De Vries
    "The 8 core Nehalem seems to be a megamacholomaniamonolitic die.
    larger still as Dunnington (700 mm2 ?) More for bragging rights
    purpose as for profitability, considering that it will be rather TDP limited.

    Istanbul could be at or just below 300 mm2. Istanbul/Sao Paulo should
    become a mass market 32nm device so it's not a bad idea in terms of
    risk reduction to develop them as server/workstation chips at 45nm."
    I completely agree with Hans on this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Hans De Vries
    "It is better to add cores, to 6 in total, as to extend the L2 caches from
    512kB to 1MB per core on a 4-core device as was planned with Montreal."
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    What's actually shocking is the bad L2 density/design overhead.

    Total L2 here would already = "3" cores.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447
    Rounding up the L3 to 8MB would be nice, too.

    What's actually shocking is the bad L2 density/design overhead.
    The L2 cell density in Shanghai is on par with the Nehalem's one.
    The odd thing here is that AMD is reusing that L2 design for the L3 cells, while Intel will be using brand new denser L3 cells for Nehalem (~50&#37.
    Last edited by fellix_bg; 05-12-2008 at 03:22 AM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by fellix_bg View Post
    Rounding up the L3 to 8MB would be nice, too.


    The L2 cell density in Shanghai is on par with the Nehalem's one.
    The odd thing here is that AMD is reusing that L2 design for the L3 cells, while Intel will be using brand new denser L3 cells for Nehalem (~50&#37.
    if you take in to account fact that Barcelona is 283mm^2, and that Istanbul is 297mm^2,it's obvious that's important for AMD to keep die under 300mm^2. With that in mind I would expect more cores and more cache with 32nm tech.
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Istanbul should be okay @300mm^2. It doesn't need particularly high clocks either, even when compared to Dunnington's top bin.

    Isn't it shown that L2's impact is minimal and size increase is a diminishing return? They need to make L2 faster not bigger. By then, they could use the same tactic as Nehalem, and just have 256 per core.

    Maxing out at 2.4Ghz, 115W?

  6. #6
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    What's actually shocking is the bad L2 density/design overhead.

    Total L2 here would already = "3" cores.
    historically speaking AMD's Transistors are slightly larger than Intel's for any given process (which is both a good and a bad thing) So their SRAM cells being larger isn't a surprise to anyone.
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7
    Has no one realized that "picture" is an artistic impression? Hans merely photochopped a Shanghai to have 6 cores...the layout and cache sizes are purely how he sees it playing out. Zero reality here for all we know.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Turkey / ANK
    Posts
    214
    AMD comming back..
    Q6600 1.390v 3.8G Vid: 1.2125 Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme .DFI LanParty DK P35-T2RS. Crucial Ballistix Tracer 8500 2x1GB.. Seagate 410As Raid0 .. Sapphire HD4870 512mb & Cooling Thermalright HR-03 GT.. 19 LG 1950SQ .. Silverstone OP850 watt. Case Gigabyte Auro3D

  9. #9
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,080
    AMD don't have the R&D or capital investment to "come back" now, Intel have won.
    Gigabyte EP45-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F13a bios | Intel Q9450 Yorkfield 413x8=3.3GHz | OCZ ProXStream 1000W PSU | Azuen X-Fi Prelude 64MB X-RAM| WD VelociRaptor 74HLFS-01G6U0 16MB cache 74GB - 2 drive RAID 0 64k stripe | ASUS 9800GT Ultimate 512MB RAM (128 SP!!) | G.SKILL PC2-8800 4GB kit @ 1100MHz | OCZ ATV Turbo 4GB USB flash | Scythe Ninja Copper + Scythe 120mm fan | BenQ M2400HD 24" 16:9 LCD | Plextor 716SA 0308; firmware 1.11 | Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 8000 | Netgear RangeMax DG834PN 108mbps; firmware 1.03.39 + HAWKING HWUG1 108mbps USB dongle | Digital Doc 5+ | 7 CoolerMaster 80mm blue LED fans | Aopen H700A tower case | Vista Home Premium - 32bit, SP1

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by 4X_FTL View Post
    Has no one realized that "picture" is an artistic impression? Hans merely photochopped a Shanghai to have 6 cores...the layout and cache sizes are purely how he sees it playing out. Zero reality here for all we know.
    I was going to ask about that, thanks for clarification.
    It's "ARTIST IMPRESSION", then.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North West London
    Posts
    776
    Quote Originally Posted by 865pe View Post
    AMD comming back..
    Yes I hope so.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by 865pe View Post
    AMD comming back..
    Yes indeed, and this time it's intel that will end up in the intensive care unit!

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Dower
    AMD don't have the R&D or capital investment to "come back" now, Intel have won.
    Now, now


    I'll take 4! Honestly, looks good to me, 'artist impression' or not.
    new-old rig:
    E8600
    2x ASUS 4850
    DFI X48 board
    4 gb DDR2
    650w FSP PSU
    Working on some liquid cooling!

    old-old rig:
    Opteron 165 @ 2.610 (1.425v)
    - Prime Stable, Stock HSF
    DFI LanParty UT Expert
    2gb G. Skill Dual Channel Ram 2.5-3-3-6
    7900gt CO SuperClocked
    2x WD250gb SATA in RAID 0
    FSP Epsilon 600W

    heatware: thenrz

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    this is instanbul chip photo

    that means the first parts are ready...

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    376
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    Here's what Hans has to say:
    It's probably not a bad idea for AMD to take advantage of their relatively
    small core size. At 45nm it can cram two cores (with 256 kB L1 total) into
    30mm2. A single Nehalem core with 256 kB L2 also occupies ~30 mm2.

    So in terms of IPC/mm2 you get two cores against one core with 2 threads.
    Yeah... if only there would be an aircooler capable of keeping a 700 mm2 AMD chip from overheating.

    And they probably need to do 2 real cores against 2 of Nehalem's threads to keep up anyway...


    Generalizations are, in general, wrong.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    anyway, two cores of K10.5 will be faster than 1 Nehalem core with HT

    thus six-core K10.5 will be competitive enough with quad-core nehalem with HT

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by 865pe View Post
    AMD comming back..
    AMD will never be back, the war is over. AMD is a budget cpu manufacturer like they were before the Athlon days, except now they are losing half a billion dollars a quarter.
    Core i5 750 3.8ghz, TRUE 120 w/Panaflo M1A 7v
    ASRock P55 Deluxe
    XFX 5870
    2x2GB GSkill Ripjaw DDR3-1600
    Samsung 2233RZ - Pioneer PDP-5020FD - Hyundai L90D+
    Raptor WD1500ADFD - WD Caviar Green 1.5TB
    X-FI XtremeMusic w/ LN4962
    Seasonic S12-500
    Antec P182

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    703
    Design wise, I'm sure AMD can keep going, but money is definitely a factor. Now just have to wait for some private equity fund from China or Middle East to fund the company, and then we'll see US gov't intervene and find US private investors for AMD.

    Perhaps it's wishful thinking, but I hope it happens.
    A wiseman once said, "If Bible proves the existence of God, then comic books prove the existence of Superheros."

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    I completely agree with Hans on this:
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans De Vries
    "It is better to add cores, to 6 in total, as to extend the L2 caches from
    512kB to 1MB per core on a 4-core device as was planned with Montreal."
    Seeing how slow my Firefox is, I don't. Single threaded performance is more important IMO.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Oxford (England)
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by shiznit93 View Post
    AMD will never be back, the war is over. AMD is a budget cpu manufacturer like they were before the Athlon days, except now they are losing half a billion dollars a quarter.
    Damn, why the hatred towards AMD have they bothered you that much that you have to be so negative about them

    I hope things take a turn for the good in the case of AMD a little competition is never a bad thing.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    1,315
    For a second I seen 5 cores and had a WTF moment lol.


    This xmas season will be an interesting one for sure
    Phenom 9950BE @ 3.24Ghz| ASUS M3A78-T | ASUS 4870 | 4gb G.SKILL DDR2-1000 |Silverstone Strider 600w ST60F| XFI Xtremegamer | Seagate 7200.10 320gb | Maxtor 200gb 7200rpm 16mb | Samsung 206BW | MCP655 | MCR320 | Apogee | MCW60 | MM U2-UFO |

    A64 3800+ X2 AM2 @3.2Ghz| Biostar TF560 A2+ | 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 | Sapphire 3870 512mb | Aircooled inside a White MM-UFO Horizon |

    Current Phenom overclock


    Max Phenom overclock

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    333
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmer411 View Post
    For a second I seen 5 cores and had a WTF moment lol.


    This xmas season will be an interesting one for sure
    I see 5 cores as well. I doubt the 0 core will be working as 0 has no value. (kidding)

    BTW , this is how I see AMD going down the tubes in the near future.

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11758

    And guess who the former CEO was for Nextel?
    Internet will save the World.

    Foxconn MARS
    Q9650@3.8Ghz
    Gskill 4Gb-1066 DDR2
    EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 448/C Classified Ultra
    WD 1T Black
    Theramlright Extreme 120
    CORSAIR 650HX

    BenQ FP241W Black 24" 6ms
    Win 7 Ultimate x64

  23. #23
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Philly/NJ
    Posts
    3,933
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    this is instanbul chip photo

    that means the first parts are ready...
    ARTIST RENDER.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    ARTIST RENDER.
    Whoever is familiar with Mr. De Vries work knows how insightful he is when it comes to new, yet to be released CPU's. This is "artistic impression", but it's not a drawing of some kid, but the man who really knows why he has drawn this picture in the way he did. This is the most logical way that Istanbul die can look.
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by m^2 View Post
    Seeing how slow my Firefox is, I don't. Single threaded performance is more important IMO.
    dude this is server CPU!
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •