Results 1 to 25 of 1337

Thread: [18th Anniversary] Asus Black Pearl - P5k-Premium Testing Report

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    7

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by sesdave View Post
    On air these temps are pretty good with an ambient like you have. You really cant afford any volts increase as it will up the temps so if your CPU is upto it try it with increasing FSB to get to 3.2 - 400x8 would give best overall CPU/MB/Memory performance. What your current BIOS setting.
    I tried increasing the FSB to 400. This lead to increase in core temperature by 6c. It reached a max of 68c under max load and 47c at normal load. I have set the following setting:

    CMOS Ratio : 8
    FSB Strap: Auto
    FSB Freq: 400
    CPU voltage: 1.4375
    CPU PLL volt: 1.5
    FSB term volt: 1.4
    NorthBridge volt: 1.4

    I don't know how to try reduce these voltage settings .

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Devon drinking Cider
    Posts
    105
    In reply to haoster, mine is pretty much the same if not worse lol. But do not notice it any other time than running this. My board is 77 serial no




    Both drives show Ultra Dma mode 5!
    Q6600 @3.825@1.508v l724A828,P5K-Premium,2x1gb xms2 6400c4 v1.2(D9)
    HD4870@800/1100 EK FC,Creative X-fi,1 x raptorX+Seagate 7200.11 500gb
    PCP&C Silencer750 Quad,D-Tek Fusion,D5,Pa120.3+PA120.1 4xYates,Case 3xNexus
    Lian li V2000+

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,012
    Ok, here's some more feedback

    The 0612 bios gave me some headache. System was still stable at all bench test suites (Small FFT, OCCT in RAM mode, Vantage Suites...) but I expierienced random lockups at startup with the cold boot issue (usually signing an overclock failure). I think it is related to the RAM voltage. In fact, those extra performance compared to 0504 requiered more volts in my RAM modules.

    Having to feed it now about 2.20v instead of 2.10v, I preferred for that voltage to use its full bandwidth.

    I set a 4:5 ratio now instead of 1:1 to get a 1186MHz RAM at 5-5-5-15-4-45-8-6-6 (I shall tweak tRAS, trfc and other subtimings in a second time to improve memory copy performance) with 2.25v in the RAM now.
    The system is rock stable, as usual (OCCT RAM, Prime95 small FFT, Futuremak suites and F@H). I increased vNB to 1.40 and vFSB to 1.30, all other settings are unchanged. In a second time I will try to set vNB and vFSB at lowest as they were in the setup with my signature

    Here are the everest scores now, far better than my previous 950MHz CAS4 on the table in my signature



    So, be advised, if your memory is running at its limits on bios 0504, 0612 may requiere some more juice in the DDR and NB.

    Feed you back soon when the system setup is fully stable and the voltages (vFSB and vNB) tweaked to lower values
    Last edited by jonny_ftm; 05-08-2008 at 09:13 AM.
    Q6600 G0 L740B126 Lapped, 2x1Gb Kingston HyperX DDR2-1200
    Gigabyte 8800 GTS 512Mb OC 756-1890-1000
    TT Toughpower 750 W (W0116) new 8xPCI-E Rev.
    Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD6400 AAKS rocks
    WC: Swiftech H2O-Apex Ultra 220 GT + PA120.3 5v
    OCZ XTC RAM Cooler, HR-05 IFX + 80mm FAN (NB), 2x HR-09U type 2 (mosfets), Modded Zalman ZM NB-47J (SB), Arctic-Cooling MX-2
    Vista 32 bits
    ------------
    - ASUS P5K Premium bios 0612: (3.84GHz 8x480) @1.432v


    ------------
    - P5B Deluxe: 3.60GHz (9x400) @1.33v *** Old Setup (P5B deluxe)

    OCCT 2.x Final Download

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,012
    Ah, forgot to say these performances are explained by the strap... 266
    Strap 333, CAS5 was crappy performance. Strap 266 at 1186MHz RAM and 475 FSB was not possible on 0504 with low voltages. Now, with bios 0612, this board can sustain those settings. I'll let you know if it handle them with lower vNB and vFSB, even if I'm already happy with stability at the actual voltages. I'll edit my signature soon when 100% finished tweaking

    Really, intel should reinvent the P35 instead of flooding us with crappy X38 and X48 chips
    Q6600 G0 L740B126 Lapped, 2x1Gb Kingston HyperX DDR2-1200
    Gigabyte 8800 GTS 512Mb OC 756-1890-1000
    TT Toughpower 750 W (W0116) new 8xPCI-E Rev.
    Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD6400 AAKS rocks
    WC: Swiftech H2O-Apex Ultra 220 GT + PA120.3 5v
    OCZ XTC RAM Cooler, HR-05 IFX + 80mm FAN (NB), 2x HR-09U type 2 (mosfets), Modded Zalman ZM NB-47J (SB), Arctic-Cooling MX-2
    Vista 32 bits
    ------------
    - ASUS P5K Premium bios 0612: (3.84GHz 8x480) @1.432v


    ------------
    - P5B Deluxe: 3.60GHz (9x400) @1.33v *** Old Setup (P5B deluxe)

    OCCT 2.x Final Download

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by holwill View Post
    In reply to haoster, mine is pretty much the same if not worse lol. But do not notice it any other time than running this. My board is 77 serial no

    Both drives show Ultra Dma mode 5!
    I have a 76xx board and now run matrix raid 0/1 on my 2 old Hitachis - this setup spanks your single raptors for performance. With latest sata drives in a RAID 5/10 setup you can achieve upto 450MBs transfer rates and over 3000 - 4000Mbs burst with matrix setup! If you want best performance from drives do yourself a favour and join the matrix. http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=467848 Reverendmaynard did and he's one happy bunny
    Last edited by sesdave; 05-10-2008 at 09:21 AM.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,938
    Quote Originally Posted by sesdave View Post
    I have a 76xx board and now run matrix raid 0/1 on my 2 old Hitachis - this setup spanks your single raptors for performance. If you want best performance from drives do yourself a favour and join the matrix. http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=467848 Reverendmaynard did and he's one happy bunny

    Word ses. Incredibly reliable with that added RAID1 partition. Had a mass power failure last night and it did something to RAID1, but now the Intel Storage Manager is repairing it, without even noticing a glitch....in the Matrix lol.
    GB 790XTA UD4
    GSkill Pi Black 2000 Cas9
    ASUS 4870
    Enermax Revolution 1050+





    http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=67661

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard View Post
    Word ses. Incredibly reliable with that added RAID1 partition. Had a mass power failure last night and it did something to RAID1, but now the Intel Storage Manager is repairing it, without even noticing a glitch....in the Matrix lol.
    Yeah - it fun to watch intel doing something right! You really should get Acronis though if you want RAID0 recovery after a partition or total disk fail cos that is striped not mirrored. It works no problems from a partion backup on RAID1 or using recoveryCD and USB RAID0 partition backup in the event of a total drive fail - I assume you have that for you data backup anyway. I dont know of any other software that offers that for RAID.
    Last edited by sesdave; 05-10-2008 at 09:31 AM.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,938
    Quote Originally Posted by sesdave View Post
    Yeah - it fun to watch intel doing something right! You really should get Acronis though if you want RAID0 recovery after a partition or total disk fail cos that is striped not mirrored. It works no problems from a partion backup on RAID1 or using recoveryCD and USB RAID0 partition backup in the event of a total drive fail - I assume you have that for you data backup anyway. I dont know of any other software that offers that for RAID.
    it's only my OS and games on the RAID0...no need to buy Acronis. Anyone who puts precious data on a RAID0 set up deserves to lose it

    Oh and we tested some Acronis products for work, nothing even came close to touching ubuntu + fog + PING we image 500+ machine a day.
    Last edited by ReverendMaynard; 05-11-2008 at 04:33 AM.
    GB 790XTA UD4
    GSkill Pi Black 2000 Cas9
    ASUS 4870
    Enermax Revolution 1050+





    http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=67661

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard View Post
    it's only my OS and games on the RAID0...no need to buy Acronis. Anyone who puts precious data on a RAID0 set up deserves to lose it

    Oh and we tested some Acronis products for work, nothing even came close to touching ubuntu + fog + PING we image 500+ machine a day.
    Only suggested it as before you went Matrix you said you were not keen to reinstall as you had your Vista setup the way you liked it I too would not be using Acronis on an industrial scale - only my games PC . Its cheap and does the job . We use Tivoli and Altiris at work for imaging PCs and servers.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by vcrajeeb View Post
    I tried increasing the FSB to 400. This lead to increase in core temperature by 6c. It reached a max of 68c under max load and 47c at normal load. I have set the following setting:

    CMOS Ratio : 8
    FSB Strap: Auto
    FSB Freq: 400
    CPU voltage: 1.4375
    CPU PLL volt: 1.5
    FSB term volt: 1.4
    NorthBridge volt: 1.4

    I don't know how to try reduce these voltage settings .
    Your just unlucky with your CPu - it got a high VID and seems to want a lot of volts to overclock. Most should do 3.2 on stock volts and lowest settings or there about.. So if you want to clock that one you have limited option with your ambient temp. Check to see if the IHS and the HSF are flat. Lap whatever isnt flat. That should get some temp improvement which may give some overclocking headroom. Chilled cooling with your ambients would sort you out - but at a price!.. Overall you would be better off with a 45mm as they run cooler and need less volts. As a last go to try to get volts down and a 3.2 overclock try most settings on auto and see what CPUZ says for volts if it boots. Set the vcore to that voltage plus .025 for vdroop and try again. We can start a process of elimination for settings-lol!

    AI Overclocking: Manual
    CPU Ratio Control: Manual
    - Ratio CMOS Setting: 8
    FSB Frequency: 400
    PCI-E Frequency: 100
    DRAM Frequency: 800
    DRAM Command Rate: 2T
    DRAM Timing Control: Manual
    CAS# Latency: 4
    RAS# to CAS# Delay: 4
    RAS# Precharge:4
    RAS# Activate to Precharge:12
    TWR: auto
    TRFC: auto
    TWTR: auto
    TRRD: auto
    TRTP: auto
    DRAM Static Read Control: disabled

    Transaction Booster: AUTO
    Clock Over-Charging Mode: AUTO

    CPU Spread Spectrum: Disabled
    PCIE Spread Spectrum: Disabled

    CPU Voltage: auto
    CPU Voltage Reference: AUTO
    CPU Voltage Damper: Enabled
    CPU PLL Voltage: auto
    DRAM Voltage: 2.2 or whatever yours need
    FSB Termination Voltage: auto
    North Bridge Voltage: auto
    North Bridge Voltage Reference: AUTO
    South Bridge Voltage: AUTO

    Advance CPU Settings
    CPU Ratio Control: Manual
    - Ratio CMOS Setting:8
    C1E Suppport: disabled
    Max CPUID Value Limit: Disabled
    Vanderpool Technology: Disabled
    CPU TM Function: Disabled
    Execute Disable Bit: Disabled
    PECI: Disabled

    USB Configuration
    USB Functions: Enabled
    Legacy USB Support: Enabled
    Last edited by sesdave; 05-10-2008 at 04:24 AM.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •