Quote Originally Posted by Mr.X View Post
I don't understand why would nVidia name a GPU with a completely new core, which is supposed to be the real successor of the G80, 9900. Seeing how they named 9800GTX a card which is barely faster than the 8800GTX, this one should be the 10800GTX or something.

Where's the catch?
The whole point is to be as confusing as possible. Keep in mind they released a G92 8800GTS.So in that case it went from G80 to G92 but kept the exact same name. Not a stretch at all that 9900GTX would be G200. The fact that it confuses you is only an argument in its favor.