BOINC benchmark: post results

**STEvil** · 03-22-2008, 01:50 AM

XP-64, 5.10.13
E4300 @ 2.5ghz 1.25v (277mhz FSB)
4x1GB @ 5-4-4-18 2T @ 926mhz

3/22/2008 4:40:07 AM|| 2316 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/22/2008 4:40:07 AM|| 7241 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

**Durkadurka** · 03-24-2008, 07:54 PM

QX9650 @ 4GHz, 4x1GB DDR2-1066 5-5-5-15, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

25.03.2008 04:51:16||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| Number of CPUs: 4
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| 4218 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| 8712 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

e6600 @ 3.2GHz, 2x2GB DDR2-800 4-4-4-12, XP Pro 32-bit SP2

25.03.2008 04:57:32||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 04:57:32|| Number of CPUs: 2
25.03.2008 04:57:32|| 2967 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 04:57:32|| 6316 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

**Exal** · 03-25-2008, 05:28 AM

x3220 @3.4ghz ram@1053mhz 5-5-5-15 windows xp 32bit

25-03-2008 14:28:23|| 3287 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25-03-2008 14:28:23|| 7422 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

**Martijn** · 03-25-2008, 05:49 AM

Originally Posted by Durkadurka

QX9650 @ 4GHz, 4x1GB DDR2-1066 5-5-5-15, Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1

25.03.2008 04:51:16||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| Number of CPUs: 4
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| 4218 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 04:51:16|| 8712 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

That score can be better, I'm getting that with my Q66 @ 3.6. It should be well over 4k/10k.

**Durkadurka** · 03-25-2008, 06:23 AM

Originally Posted by Martijn

That score can be better, I'm getting that with my Q66 @ 3.6. It should be well over 4k/10k.

Does it matter if you run the benchmark off a fresh reboot?
The computer has been up for a week or so, folding 24/7.

**The Warlock** · 03-25-2008, 06:51 AM

Asus p5n-t Deluxe(780i) with a e6750 running at 3.2ghz with 1066 5-5-5-15 reapers Vistax64 sp1
25.03.2008 16:16:39||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 16:16:39|| Number of CPUs: 2
25.03.2008 16:16:39|| 3031 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 16:16:39|| 9458 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Asus p5e-vm hdmi(g35) with a e8400 running stock 3.0ghz with reapers running at 1000 5-5-5-15, vista x64 sp1
25.03.2008 15:55:11||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 15:55:11|| Number of CPUs: 2
25.03.2008 15:55:11|| 3030 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 15:55:11|| 8727 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Asus p5k/epu(p35) with a e8400 running stock 3.0ghz, with dominators running at 800 4-4-4-12, vista x64 sp1
25.03.2008 16:05:25||Benchmark results:
25.03.2008 16:05:25|| Number of CPUs: 2
25.03.2008 16:05:25|| 3041 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
25.03.2008 16:05:25|| 8865 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Asus (p35) p5k/EPU with a q9300 running at 2,775Ghz, ram Dominators running at 888 Mhz Ver 5.10.45 vista x64 sp1
18.04.2008 15:29:08||Benchmark results:
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| Number of CPUs: 4
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| 2804 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
18.04.2008 15:29:08|| 8141 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
__________________

All benchmarks done with 5.10.45

**Martijn** · 03-25-2008, 06:55 AM

Originally Posted by Durkadurka

Does it matter if you run the benchmark off a fresh reboot?
The computer has been up for a week or so, folding 24/7.

No, but programs running in the background reduce your benchmark significantly.

**STEvil** · 03-25-2008, 07:16 PM

Upgraded to 5.10.45

E4300 @ 2.5ghz 1.25v (277mhz FSB)
4x1GB @ 5-4-4-18 2T @ 926mhz
XP-64

3/26/2008 9:08:52 PM|| 2307 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/26/2008 9:08:52 PM|| 7222 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

A64 4200 @ 2.5 1.39v (227fsb)
4x512 @ 2-4-4-12-2T @ 227mhz
XP-64

3/26/2008 9:08:41 PM|| 2332 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/26/2008 9:08:41 PM|| 5788 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

**Thund3rb1rd** · 03-26-2008, 10:54 AM

If I installed WCG client, and ran benches while CPU was stock, and then OCed. Should I run benches again? Or, will everything eventually adjust themselves?

**David_L6** · 03-26-2008, 11:02 AM

Originally Posted by Thund3rb1rd

If I installed WCG client, and ran benches while CPU was stock, and then OCed. Should I run benches again? Or, will everything eventually adjust themselves?

Run the benchmarks again.

**jcool** · 03-26-2008, 02:35 PM

Q6600@445*9, Win XP x64 SP2, Boinc 5.10.45:

3813 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11791 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Seems like Yorkfield is stronger on the FPU...?!
Integer and XP x64 still kicks ass though.

**Durkadurka** · 03-27-2008, 02:32 AM

I'm getting some new memory sticks today, when they are installed I'm gonna try changing my clock.
The guys with high integer score seems to use a higher FSB than me (10x400), so I'm gonna try using higher FSB to see what effect that has.

**jcool** · 03-27-2008, 10:09 AM

I don't think the increase in integer score can be solely attributed to my Q6600 running 45Mhz more FSB, it's just too much difference (8712 <-> 11791)
I think it's more likely related to the OS used/different client optimization levels (your FPU score is a lot higher than mine, more than the extra cache would give I'd think)

**Durkadurka** · 03-27-2008, 11:21 AM

You are right, I now run 9x445 instead of 10x400, and the scores are basically the same.
So I guess the BOINC client isnt optimized for 64-bit Vista.

**The Warlock** · 03-28-2008, 04:43 AM

Ok, overclocked my e8400 too 3,6Ghz on the p5e-vm hdmi board, ram running 1000 vistax64 ultimate sp1 by upping the bus speed to 400, did not increase voltage(i believe it was at auto)
28.03.2008 13:36:27||Benchmark results:
28.03.2008 13:36:27|| Number of CPUs: 2
28.03.2008 13:36:27|| 3601 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
28.03.2008 13:36:27|| 10434 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Coretemp shows the temps to over 60-61 degrees celsius,its a htpc, is it safe to run at this temp?
It was running at just over 50 degrees at stock. Is coretemp even correct with wolfdale?

**Thund3rb1rd** · 03-28-2008, 06:02 AM

3/28/2008 9:17:15 AM||Benchmark results:
3/28/2008 9:17:15 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
3/28/2008 9:17:15 AM|| 3147 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/28/2008 9:17:15 AM|| 6908 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

e6300 @ 3.2, 2x1GB @ 914mhz 5-5-5-10, vista 64 ulti
ran into a wall with my ram....it's stock speed is 400fsb, and right now I'm running (stable) at 457, 1.85vdimm, 5-5-5-10....but when I push the fsb to 472 they fail stability, even if I bump the vdimm up to 2.1, loosen timings to 5-5-5-15, bump the vtt, nb, sb all up one notch...I don't understand how that much adjustments can't push another meager 15mhz, I must be missing something, but I don't know what
my cpu is stable at 7*472(3.3ghz)

edit:
3/28/2008 12:04:51 PM|| 3356 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/28/2008 12:04:51 PM|| 7198 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
@ 3.4, 486mhz
set vtt, nb, sb volts back to default, took a little bump on vcore, and set ram timings to 'auto' (not spd, tho)....just as a "let's see what happens" feeling.....cpuz says my rams are running 4-5-5-15....stable....I would LOVE to hear an explanation if anyone has one about this
that's all the testing I can do today, gotta get to work

**The Warlock** · 03-28-2008, 08:53 AM

Will a cpu overclocked by 20% yield 20% more in boinc?
I couldnt help it, overclocked both e8400 too 3,6ghz,1600fsb(20%), but how much does this matter in boinc?

**sierra_bound** · 03-28-2008, 09:38 AM

Originally Posted by The Warlock

Will a cpu overclocked by 20% yield 20% more in boinc?
I couldnt help it, overclocked both e8400 too 3,6ghz,1600fsb(20%), but how much does this matter in boinc?

An overclocked CPU will yield more points per day. But it's difficult calculating how much more because BOINC uses a two-step process.

You can read more about the points system here.

**jcool** · 03-29-2008, 04:05 AM

SB do you know which BOINC score is more important to WCG output, FPU or Intreger? It seems that XP x64 is better on the integer, while Vista 64 is stronger on the FPU...

**sierra_bound** · 03-29-2008, 07:14 AM

Floating point tends to be more important. It's a better indicator of the real computing power of your PC. The integer results on some operating systems, especially Linux, are inflated. With Kubuntu x64 I did 15,000+ in the Dhrystone test. That was with an Intel dual-core running at 3.6GHz.

**jcool** · 03-31-2008, 12:53 AM

Ok... but I don't think my integer score is fake or too high, since it's the same with every new boinc version and others have similar results. So it must have some effect?!
Just trying to decide which OS is best for my Dual Harpertown cruncher... Maybe I'll try Win Server 08.

**Emerica** · 03-31-2008, 12:56 AM

3/31/2008 4:55:28 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
3/31/2008 4:55:29 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
3/31/2008 4:56:00 AM||Benchmark results:
3/31/2008 4:56:00 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
3/31/2008 4:56:00 AM|| 3220 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/31/2008 4:56:00 AM|| 9980 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
3/31/2008 4:56:01 AM||Resuming computation

This is on Windows 2003 "Enterprise" Server x64 and an E6400 @ 3.4GHZ. I love this OS by the way.

**Bail_w** · 03-31-2008, 02:01 AM

Originally Posted by Emerica

This is on Windows 2003 "Enterprise" Server x64 and an E6400 @ 3.4GHZ. I love this OS by the way.

any reason why?

**loonym** · 03-31-2008, 04:53 AM

3/31/2008 8:49:44 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
3/31/2008 8:50:16 AM||Benchmark results:
3/31/2008 8:50:16 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
3/31/2008 8:50:16 AM|| 3422 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3/31/2008 8:50:16 AM|| 10570 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

The benchmark only uses one core?

**Exal** · 03-31-2008, 05:57 AM

yup, wcg isn't multithreaded in the fashon that a WU can be assigned to 4 cores, you get 4 wu's assigned to 4 cores in case of a quad eg

Thread: BOINC benchmark: post results

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions