Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
Maybe I'm wrong, but if you check that cpu-z screenshot you will see:

FSB 444
Multiplier x6.0 (6-10)

Maybe that SPI score is at 4440MHz, because at idle SpeedStep is working.

But Nehalem does not use FSB so...
I refuse to believe QC Nehalem runs in early steppings at 4.44GHz. I'd say that is an ES with unlocked multipliers.Probably , it had a 266MHz FSB clock and was OC to 444 , multiplier dropped accordingly to 6.

I mean wtf , 20% better than Core per clock and running 40% faster ?

That's 70% better performance than Core.


Quote Originally Posted by mAJORD View Post
Failed maths?

I see about 16%-17% /clock compared with Yorkfield which is pretty decent.
See above.I must say , I'm perfectly satisfied with only 20% per clock and 40% higher frequency from the start .I must admit such a scenario would be really bad news for the green team.