MMM
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 164

Thread: 3870 x2 review

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    r670 runs cooler then g92...
    its a single pcb. single card. people complain they want a single card solution now you got to go "o no no it has to be single gpu too"
    thats stupid, for a high end card this thing is nice. since its a single card probable uses less power too.
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    1,838
    A little disappointed, it does beat the Ultra overall but if it cant win in Crysis then its not going to get my vote. Thats the 1 game that people would like to play at a decent framerate and its just not cutting it. Lets just hope the 8800GX2 ( not worthy of being called 9800 ) can do better.

    I do agree that this cards design is better than the GX2 as having 1 pcb means it will be alot easier for those of us who want to watercool our gpus.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by knightwolf654 View Post
    r670 runs cooler then g92...
    its a single pcb. single card. people complain they want a single card solution now you got to go "o no no it has to be single gpu too"
    thats stupid, for a high end card this thing is nice. since its a single card probable uses less power too.

    Not quite..RV670 runs cooler when idle, but use more power under load.

    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    Of course it's a single card, +- same perf as 2 3870's, price seems same as 2 3870's... (cheaper than the competition brand), and with two of this card you have quadfire.
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

  5. #30
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Scubar View Post
    A little disappointed, it does beat the Ultra overall but if it cant win in Crysis then its not going to get my vote. Thats the 1 game that people would like to play at a decent framerate and its just not cutting it. Lets just hope the 8800GX2 ( not worthy of being called 9800 ) can do better.
    i really, really do not understand why if people cant play crysis on 20000fps @ cinema screen with ULTRA SUPER UBER POWER AA + AF they moan? I've played it on my 8800GTS on high with slight lag on some points and hell my bro has played it on his dual xeon with an agp 6800GS (modded to ultra).

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  6. #31
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    i play it on low with no aa or af, not at native and i'm happy
    plus according to a test by maximum pc, ati's crossfire produces better images.
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    1,838
    For most of us the gameplay of Crysis was lacking so we need the uber high graphics to make up for it. It looks like complete crap when its not at native res. Ive only played through the game once and i have no intention of playing it again until i can run it at my monitors native res of 1920x.1200 with atleast decent settings and framerates.
    Last edited by Scubar; 01-22-2008 at 05:39 AM.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    Quote Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown View Post
    i really, really do not understand why if people cant play crysis on 20000fps @ cinema screen with ULTRA SUPER UBER POWER AA + AF they moan? I've played it on my 8800GTS on high with slight lag on some points and hell my bro has played it on his dual xeon with an agp 6800GS (modded to ultra).
    Because these "some people" look at videocards like a sports-war. They wanna see a "winner", so always moaning about the one brand against the other. Some moan always about both for, well, for moaning i suppose.
    The only thing that matters is if the product is good for you, and worth your money. It cannot perform less than 1 3870 (i have now and it is fine, in all my games performs roughly 30% better than my old X1900XT, and played crysis 3 times @ High 1600x1200 ), and with 2 3870X2's we may have the currently highest games performance for 800 ~850 euro's.
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown View Post
    i really, really do not understand why if people cant play crysis on 20000fps @ cinema screen with ULTRA SUPER UBER POWER AA + AF they moan? I've played it on my 8800GTS on high with slight lag on some points and hell my bro has played it on his dual xeon with an agp 6800GS (modded to ultra).
    If you don't need it for Crysis - you don't need it at all. Yes - it faster then 8800GT in UT3, but even with 8800GT you can get in UT3 about 80 fps with high settings in pretty high resolution. So what is the point of 3870 x2 ?

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown View Post
    i really, really do not understand why if people cant play crysis on 20000fps @ cinema screen with ULTRA SUPER UBER POWER AA + AF they moan? I've played it on my 8800GTS on high with slight lag on some points and hell my bro has played it on his dual xeon with an agp 6800GS (modded to ultra).
    Well lets be honest, the only popular game available right now that can't be maxed on a single card setup at 16x10+ is Crysis. Every other title there shows an improvement, sure, but for those of us who are looking to finally max out Crysis it is still a disappointment that it's the only title that doesn't beat out the Ultra. Every other game available is playable at quite high resolutions with good levels of AA/AF with $200-$300 cards.

    Now I know it's cheaper than the Ultra, but it's still disappointing none the less.
    Honda F1 Racing 2008 -- C'mon Button!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    crysis is nvidia game like doom they don't even support cf it is polite way to say we are working for nvidia

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    if R680 have it +/- the same performance like Ultra, is comparable to GTS-512because difference between Ultra and GTS-512 is small ... GTS-512 is cheaper then this R680 ...

    You can choose : R680 - brutal heat, performance like Ultra (oced GTS-512), noisy cooler for 600USD! Or GTS-512 with oced the same performance, great cooler for 400USD ... what is better?
    Seems like you're not any better at getting the facts right than you are at making predictions or testing CPUs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Kickass card? Its CF on a card. Could just buy 2 HD3870..they would even be cheaper. And the heat..ouch...

    Its like adding 2 G92s on a card and call it kickass. It just aint. Living with all the CF/SLI bugs, specially with multi monitors is too horrible.

    Now give me a single GPU card instead. And not another R600 heatmonster.

    It needs to be same or cheaper than 2 HD3870 cards. Not more...
    It is already at the same price or cheaper than 2 HD3870 and fortunately most people won't rely on you to define what is kickass and what is not.

  13. #38
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    I'm only really interested in seeing this card in crossfire compared with 8800U's in TRI-SLi. 4 GPU's vs 3...

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    639
    VR-Zone reckons the launch has been pushed back to the original date...

    Maybe is AMD is finalizing new drivers....
    Last edited by Afterburner; 01-22-2008 at 06:16 AM.
    | Intel Core i5 2500K | Asrock P67 Extreme 6 | Gskill Ripjaws 8GB CL7 |

    | Sapphire HD6970 | Creative X-Fi modded | Corsair HX850 | Corsair H60 |



  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    271
    I wonder if they ran Crysis 1.1 with all the hotfixes installed. I would think the Crysis #s will be going up. Smoking performance is some of those other games.

    Nice 3dmark 06, looks like a fun card to benchmark with.

    Edit:

    Check out the performance in Call of Juarez, it's actually playable in DX10 for the first time!

    Last edited by Scimitar; 01-22-2008 at 06:21 AM.
    24/7 Gamer

    Q6600 @ 3.6GHz
    ASUS P5K
    8800GT @ 720, 1800, 950
    2GB Mushkin Redlines @ 500MHz 4,4,4,9
    Samsung 245BW 24" LCD

  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    614
    Yeah pretty obvious that ATI will never perform that well in Crysis. Not for a while at least. I has a damn nvidia splash screen. Kinda obvious when its the only bench that the ATI doesn't win. I hate hearing the nvidia fanbois using crysis as their only safety net.
    Aaron___________________________Wife________________________ HTPC
    intel i7 2600k_____________________AMD5000+ BE @ 3ghz___________AMD4850+ BE @ 2.5ghz
    stock cooling______________________CM Vortex P912_______________ Foxconn A7GM-S 780G
    AsRock Extreme 4_________________ GB GA-MA78GM-S2H 780G_______OCZ SLI 2gb PC6400
    4gb 1600 DDR3___________________ OCZ Plat 2GB PC6400___________Avermedia A180 HDTV tuner
    MSI 48901gb 950/999______________Tt Toughpower 600w___________ Saphire 4830
    Corsair HX620____________________ inwin allure case___________ ___ Coolmax 480w
    NZXT 410 Gunmetal________________Acer 23" 1080p________________ LiteOn BD player
    X2gen 22" WS
    ________________ ________________________________ nMediaPC 1000B case

  17. #42
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,771
    More like finalizing the hardware and then work on the drivers.
    Asus Rampage Formula X48
    Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
    OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
    Palit 4870x2
    Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
    Corsair HX1000
    LL 343B Case
    Thermochill 120.3
    2xMCP355
    KL 350AT
    KL 4870X2 FC WB
    DD Chipset Block

  18. #43
    Champion
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,375
    Quote Originally Posted by Afterburner View Post
    VR-Zone reckons the launch has been pushed back to the original date...

    Maybe is AMD is finalizing new drivers....
    Yah it go back launch on 28Jan or maybe will late to 1st week on Feb.
    i just knew this news from AMD in a hours too
    Sorry For My English
    OverclockZone Team
    THAILAND

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    Quote Originally Posted by situman View Post
    More like finalizing the hardware and then work on the drivers.
    The hardware was ready in early December (or even before that), has been posted several times here and there...
    I'm sure it's the drivers they're still working on to get them better.
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Kickass card? Its CF on a card. Could just buy 2 HD3870..they would even be cheaper. And the heat..ouch...

    Its like adding 2 G92s on a card and call it kickass. It just aint. Living with all the CF/SLI bugs, specially with multi monitors is too horrible.

    Now give me a single GPU card instead. And not another R600 heatmonster.

    It needs to be same or cheaper than 2 HD3870 cards. Not more...
    I believe you can agree that the whole obvious point of X2 card is that you can have QuadXfire. Which means that AMD has a so called "enthusiast" performance card. Which really is as you say a 3870 Xfire on a single card.

    So why would you then argue about the heat, which is the same as if you have a normal Xfire setup. Then to talk about the pain of bugs you get from Xfire/SLI is just pointless as people here have accepted the whole duel card concept. If you believe that things will go back to way it was with single powerful GPU then you are the one that is being delusional.

    Point being X2 is a kick ass card because it lets us run QuadXfire, end of story.

    You are on XtremeSystem's forum for once can you please understand that. The key word offcourse being Xtreme.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  21. #46
    The Doctor Warboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    2,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Unbornchild View Post
    The hardware was ready in early December (or even before that), has been posted several times here and there...
    I'm sure it's the drivers they're still working on to get them better.
    Maybe early revisions, but Not this finalized one we see now.

    The First 3870x2 pic i remember seeing had no memory on the card at all.
    My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
    Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....

    Build XT7 is currently active.
    Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    here in Europe costs 620 USD ... 420EUR ... maybe are spectacles better for you ...
    Again spectacles for you.Do you know what msrp is?Maybe i should spell it out .Any new hot hardware sells above msrp for awhile.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    337
    I'm surprised it performs as well as it does....but, really I don't see this driving people to sell off their GTX and ultra cards unless they want to do quadfire.

    People keep saying that this card will have the same drawbacks as normal Crossfire and SLi. Hopefully some more reviews will tell us if that's true or not.

    Edit: And by the way, the Crysis bench in the OP linked review is without AA or AF. I always run AF no matter what. As well, we don't know if they used medium settings or what.
    Last edited by Rock&Roll; 01-22-2008 at 06:53 AM.
    System: Core I7 920 @ 4200MHz 1.45vCORE 1.35VTT 1.2vIOH // EVGA x58 Classified E760 // 6GB Dominator GT 1866 @ 1688 6-7-6-18 1T 1.65V // Intel X25 80GB // PCP&C 750W Silencer
    Cooling: Heatkiller 3.0 LT CPU block // 655 Pump // GTX360 Radiator
    Sound: X-FI Titanium HD --> Marantz 2265 --> JBL 4311WXA's
    Display: GTX480 // Sony GDM-FW900

  24. #49
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Games with HD3870X2 need to suport CF (like Two HD3870 in crossfire mode)


    btw:

    + 2 reviews

    http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video...-review/page-2

    http://en.expreview.com/?p=219

    http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?50373



    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 01-22-2008 at 07:45 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  25. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Belgium, Dendermonde
    Posts
    1,292
    i just sit back and wait till 'official' reviews come out.
    Reviews with old drivers arent worth my time

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •