Rundown to SuperPrime 1.0Final : Need your help!

[Ad1tya]

SneakPeak at 0.9.8.1..

Much cleaner layout.. Also, a new feature coming up..



Non-Optimised run.. =X

[KTE]

Well here's 2.7GHz Phenom 9500 for your comparison

[KiD0M4N]

Well here's 2.7GHz Phenom 9500 for your comparison

Glad to have you back on the thread mate.

0.9.8.2 version is out, and I took your advise. Pls give it a try and see if the detection of system parameters is improved.

http://forums.erodov.com/local_links...tid=7#linkid17

PS: KTE, didn't you get any auto update messages from 0.9.7?

[KTE]

Nope, I didn't get any update reminders. But it runs the check with the latest version fine.

Congrats on the new version! I like it, the layout is nicer, runs smooth, more CPU usage (92-98&#37, brilliant detection. It also runs faster.

Here's a quick run with it:

[KiD0M4N]

Many thanks to Franck/CPUz

KTE, need one help from you. Since you are the only guy with a L3 cache here, care to PM/email me a register dump from your system?

Download CPUz 1.42 and About > Register Dump.
You already have my email id.

Will be able to fix that small little nagging bug once and for all.

I think the reduced CPU utilization compared to C2D, C2Q and Clovertowns is because of the TLB workaround? I think the stress on the TLB is causing the CPU to slow down substantially.

Anyone with a C2D care to post a result at around 2.6G? For a comparo against this Phenom.

Nope, I didn't get any update reminders. But it runs the check with the latest version fine.

Congrats on the new version! I like it, the layout is nicer, runs smooth, more CPU usage (92-98%), brilliant detection. It also runs faster.

Here's a quick run with it:

[KTE]

Many thanks to Franck/CPUz

KTE, need one help from you. Since you are the only guy with a L3 cache here, care to PM/email me a register dump from your system?

OK will do. I'm in work but I'm off because of two broken knuckles.

I think the reduced CPU utilization compared to C2D, C2Q and Clovertowns is because of the TLB workaround? I think the stress on the TLB is causing the CPU to slow down substantially.

I don't experience the bug unless I go above 2.16GHz NB or above 2.86GHz CPU so I never applied the patch.

Anyone with a C2D care to post a result at around 2.6G? For a comparo against this Phenom.

I have one, I'll match the timings and post it. Gimme 30-45 minutes, I'm one handed.

[KiD0M4N]

OK will do. I'm in work but I'm off because of two broken knuckles.
I don't experience the bug unless I go above 2.16GHz NB or above 2.86GHz CPU so I never applied the patch.

I have one, I'll match the timings and post it. Gimme 30-45 minutes, I'm one handed.

Wah... thats cool. Thanks bhaijan :P

I am out of sorts seriously... why isnt the utilization pegged to 100% like in C2Ds... am I missing something somewhere.

Waiting for the register dump.

[KTE]

Here its is. Off to start C2 system now.

[KiD0M4N]

Here its is. Off to start C2 system now.

THANKS and thanks....

Registers :P yum yum....

[tiborrr]

Can you integrate some sort of encripted validation in order to keep validate result? If you can, i will certainly open an competition ladder for this application on our community.

[KTE]

Here's an E6750 on P35 running 365x7 2555MHz (close enough?) with DDR2-912 4-4-4-4 2T PL5 (closest I could do): 58.62s



I'm going to run the same test again on Phenom when I get time using only two cores and see what the difference from 2 core vs 4 core is.

[Mindmaster]

C2D 6300 @458 MHz FSB
The Frequencies and the Multi are wrong

[KiD0M4N]

C2D 6300 @458 MHz FSB
The Frequencies and the Multi are wrong

Hey,

First of all thnx for trying this out.

I have a request. Care to save the result (Right click on the result display > Save to file...) and host it here? I would love to figure out why its giving such a weird result.

Regards,
Karan Misra

[KTE]

Ask Mindmaster for CPU-Z screenshots. Then you can compare if its just your app or others too.

[KiD0M4N]

Here's an E6750 on P35 running 365x7 2555MHz (close enough?) with DDR2-912 4-4-4-4 2T PL5 (closest I could do): 58.62s



I'm going to run the same test again on Phenom when I get time using only two cores and see what the difference from 2 core vs 4 core is.

Yup, that will shed some light.

[KTE]

Here ya go.

X2 5000+ BE at same mult/speed/HT (etc) as Phenom 9500 (2 threads). Couldn't keep RAM frequency the same but it shouldn't matter that much.

X2 - Phenom
-

This is what I don't understand about the bench. How can 2 threads on 2 cores (above) get the same or higher time than 4 threads on 2 cores (below)?

[G H Z]

Looks good, I noticed it doesn't run on 64-bit OS.

[Movieman]

Looks good, I noticed it doesn't run on 64-bit OS.

Yup, it does. This was on win2K3 ent 64 bit:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=25

[KiD0M4N]

Looks good, I noticed it doesn't run on 64-bit OS.

Yup, it does. This was on win2K3 ent 64 bit:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=25

Thanks for the confirmation.

I have personally run it on Vista X64 and tested it. Ran perfectly. G H Z did you try the latest version? 0.9.8.2

Let me know.

Regards,
Karan

[G H Z]

A re-boot fixed the initial problem where sprime would simply dissapear after execution of the bench - something about checking single threaded results or similar in log window (.NET 3.5), now I can complete the bench.

Don't mind the temp differences, one quad is B3, the other G0.



I do get a system error on completion, could be that this is a server with more security than a desktop.



Either way this is a nice program, only changes I'd suggest are to consider a a different naming scheme for the different test sequences, test/defense against speed hack programs & online validation.

Great work so far

[KiD0M4N]

Thanks so much G H Z

I am working feveresly on the online validation and result submission. If you see, I have worked some kind of encryption into the results, and I will always be around (unless Global warming floods my home, i.e.) to take care of "those dem haxxers!" if need be. A method of checking is already incorporated (something to do with the single threaded checking :P)

I will definitely work on the naming scheme of the runs. Any suggestions?

I am myself developing this on VS2008 (.NET 3.5) but the application profile set to .NET 2.0 so as to make sure it runs everywhere with atleast 2.0 installed.

I will definitely try this on a server enviroment (VMware, here I come) and try to get that error fixed.

@David: Did you get the same error in the ~19 sec 1E8 run of yours? I think both are on Windows Server 2003 OS? (both yours and G H Z's run i.e.)

Regards,
Karan

A re-boot fixed the initial problem where sprime would simply dissapear after execution of the bench - something about checking single threaded results or similar in log window (.NET 3.5), now I can complete the bench.

Don't mind the temp differences, one quad is B3, the other G0.



I do get a system error on completion, could be that this is a server with more security than a desktop.



Either way this is a nice program, only changes I'd suggest are to consider a a different naming scheme for the different test sequences, test/defense against speed hack programs & online validation.

Great work so far

[Movieman]

Thanks so much G H Z

I am working feveresly on the online validation and result submission. If you see, I have worked some kind of encryption into the results, and I will always be around (unless Global warming floods my home, i.e.) to take care of "those dem haxxers!" if need be. A method of checking is already incorporated (something to do with the single threaded checking :P)

I will definitely work on the naming scheme of the runs. Any suggestions?

I am myself developing this on VS2008 (.NET 3.5) but the application profile set to .NET 2.0 so as to make sure it runs everywhere with atleast 2.0 installed.

I will definitely try this on a server enviroment (VMware, here I come) and try to get that error fixed.

@David: Did you get the same error in the ~19 sec 1E8 run of yours? I think both are on Windows Server 2003 OS? (both yours and G H Z's run i.e.)

Regards,
Karan

I didn't get any errors at all. Just installed, bumped the machine up a little and let it fly..
Perfect.

[FrogBite]

here's mine, the cpu speed is a bit wrong...

[Movieman]

here's mine, the cpu speed is a bit wrong...

I hope so or you just cut my clovers time in 1/2

[KiD0M4N]

here's mine, the cpu speed is a bit wrong...

I hope so or you just cut my clovers time in 1/2

Na, that was a 5E7 run... + not valid (see the brown line below the score) + I have no clue why it didn't detect your hardware properly.

FrogBite, care to send me your CPUz dump so I can fix it right up? Thanks again.