Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
Because 5-7-7-25 is way to slow and 5-2-2-2 ain't faster.
I don't understand what you're saying massman.
They weren't runs to show fastest time possible but to see effect of tRCD-tRP-tRAS on 1M. Let me explain how clear this is:

I only changed major timings (tRCD-tRP-tRAS) that have a large supposed effect, no subtimings changed. That shows what effect each timing is having on 1M clearly. CAS had a bigger effect than all so I left it to 5 for all. Findings: Change in timings from 5-7-7-25 to 5-2-2-2 made not even 0.08s difference in 1M. Look at my results before at higher clocks, they are showing a very similar trend.
So take for example my 3600/562/5-5-5-18 14.016s run... if I ran same MHz/subtimings but 5-5-5-5 according to this trend on my hardware I'm spotting the difference would be ~ -0.03s to 14.013s, but not much more. Either something is wrong, it's board difference or I'm missing something.

Try 5-3-3-11/13
Already did it. It was slower than 5-2-2-2, which is fastest (all things kept constant).